I think it's somewhere in the 3-5mill range?
Thanks

Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
MrMiyagi wrote:Lob to DA for the win
Da_Reel_Kboy wrote:Is it possible to combine TPE's? 5.7mil+1.8mil= 7.5mil TPE?
lilfishi22 wrote:Talking about TPE, KT just dropped 22/9/5 assist on 10-16 shooting, while playing 44min tonight.
G35 wrote:He may run a great offense but I wouldn't choose him over Amare to start a team.
irish22022 wrote:the way he played tim duncan was really fun to watch a few years back. He actually knew what he was doing.
The remainder of our TPE's are kinda useful, especially if we package them with one of our many wing players. The truth is, I don't even know what we need. It's way more then just one position. We need more good players. I really only like Nash, Hill, Gortat and Frye (I know he's not popular right now, but I think most of us can still his value). Everyone else can go as far as I'm concerned.
nevetsov wrote:Without wanting to start a new thread, anyone have a list of the major free agents in this coming offseason?
MrMiyagi wrote:Lob to DA for the win
DBrimstone wrote:Sarver's summer moves resulted in us getting screwed and that's all. We're down a 2nd round pick, traded Turkoglu away, and Hak and Childress are rotting on the bench. Sarver has no freakin clue how to build a basketball team. He should have been interviewing for the GM position long before he started and waited for someone who has an idea of how to run a team to make decisions. I personally don't like Childress. He does everything ok but nothing exceptionally well. Even our new Greek dude doesn't have a man crush on him despite the fact that he played in Greece for 2 years against lesser competition. Hak's a one trip pony who's been figured out... I hated the deals Sarver did when he made em and I hate them now. I'd be all up for trading Pietrus to a real contender for a pick if it becomes available. We need more cap space and more shots at getting someone for our future. The draft is just an educated crap shoot anyways. The more bullets you have, the better chance you have of hitting someone. I don't see any free-agents wanting to come to old Nash and the role-player crew. Dragic is gonna have to run the team for a year and show he's good (he's had 3 starts in 2 years and in 2 of the 3 he's been exceptional) before anybody would ever want to come here
lilfishi22 wrote:I still think Childress has more value on the court than Warrick even though Childress isn't playing right now. Childress scores within the system, he defends well, he rebounds well and he comes up with hustle plays. Warrick is super inconsistent offensively, doesn't defend and doesn't rebound. You just never know which Warrick will turn up each game, the screening and diving Warrick who draws fouls at a high rate and finishes on PnR's or the Warrick who tries to create his own offense and throws the ball in the general vicinity of the hoop.
Childress hasn't been overly spectacular for us even with PT, but at least we know what we get from him night in and night out.
DBrimstone wrote:Sarver's summer moves resulted in us getting screwed and that's all. We're down a 2nd round pick, traded Turkoglu away, and Hak and Childress are rotting on the bench. Sarver has no freakin clue how to build a basketball team. He should have been interviewing for the GM position long before he started and waited for someone who has an idea of how to run a team to make decisions. I personally don't like Childress. He does everything ok but nothing exceptionally well. Even our new Greek dude doesn't have a man crush on him despite the fact that he played in Greece for 2 years against lesser competition. Hak's a one trip pony who's been figured out... I hated the deals Sarver did when he made em and I hate them now. I'd be all up for trading Pietrus to a real contender for a pick if it becomes available. We need more cap space and more shots at getting someone for our future. The draft is just an educated crap shoot anyways. The more bullets you have, the better chance you have of hitting someone. I don't see any free-agents wanting to come to old Nash and the role-player crew. Dragic is gonna have to run the team for a year and show he's good (he's had 3 starts in 2 years and in 2 of the 3 he's been exceptional) before anybody would ever want to come here
nevetsov wrote:Cheers mate. Haven't watched many Wizards games this year but it looks like Nick Young is putting up big numbers - if he continues to develop he may be worth keeping an eye on during free agency..
MrMiyagi wrote:Lob to DA for the win