ImageImageImageImageImage

Lakers eFG% on jumpshots

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

Imadogg
Banned User
Posts: 8,179
And1: 251
Joined: Oct 24, 2010
Location: Reseda
Contact:

Lakers eFG% on jumpshots 

Post#1 » by Imadogg » Mon Feb 7, 2011 1:14 pm

Just looked up the eFG% (effective fg%, which adjusts for 3pters being worth more) for each of the Lakers (top 10 in minutes, so not counting the rookies and random old dudes) and made a lil graph, cuz I felt like it. Might as well post.

Image

I'm sure though just by watching games, we could tell who the worst are.
User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,719
And1: 32,003
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: Lakers eFG% on jumpshots 

Post#2 » by Dr Aki » Mon Feb 7, 2011 1:29 pm

being a scientist, i must say this graph was poorly thought out.

1. this isn't a changing variable vs time and you can't use a line graph, it needs to be a bar graph
2. the y-axis needs to start from 0% and labelled (ie. eFG%)
3. the x-axis needs a label (ie. player)

i hope i'm not being an ass, this is constructive criticism
Image
User avatar
Optms
RealGM
Posts: 23,649
And1: 20,042
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
 

Re: Lakers eFG% on jumpshots 

Post#3 » by Optms » Mon Feb 7, 2011 3:00 pm

You had me at being a scientist...

...you had me at being a scientist.
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: Lakers eFG% on jumpshots 

Post#4 » by dockingsched » Mon Feb 7, 2011 3:40 pm

keep shooting blake and brown!
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
User avatar
bathwater
Freshman
Posts: 59
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 01, 2010

Re: Lakers eFG% on jumpshots 

Post#5 » by bathwater » Mon Feb 7, 2011 4:13 pm

Aki wrote:being a scientist, i must say this graph was poorly thought out.

1. this isn't a changing variable vs time and you can't use a line graph, it needs to be a bar graph
2. the y-axis needs to start from 0% and labelled (ie. eFG%)
3. the x-axis needs a label (ie. player)

i hope i'm not being an ass, this is constructive criticism

if he followed your advice on point 2, all the points would look relatively the same.
Desiderium
Veteran
Posts: 2,544
And1: 646
Joined: May 11, 2006
 

Re: Lakers eFG% on jumpshots 

Post#6 » by Desiderium » Mon Feb 7, 2011 6:32 pm

i already knew artest and walton were the worst shooters.
Tee212
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,782
And1: 423
Joined: Jan 10, 2009

Re: Lakers eFG% on jumpshots 

Post#7 » by Tee212 » Mon Feb 7, 2011 7:57 pm

lol he said scientist, im a supervisor at del taco and a janitor by night. Just a visual comparison.. get over it.
User avatar
Gek
RealGM
Posts: 38,024
And1: 1,807
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Contact:
       

Re: Lakers eFG% on jumpshots 

Post#8 » by Gek » Mon Feb 7, 2011 10:57 pm

Someone should show this to Fisher.
#teamhermes
go pens - pirates - steelers - lakers
User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,719
And1: 32,003
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: Lakers eFG% on jumpshots 

Post#9 » by Dr Aki » Mon Feb 7, 2011 11:22 pm

i also teach students and mark their reports at university and id fail this graph instantly

and it wouldnt look relatively the same, the bars would look a lot more like each other and wouldnt look as evidently different.

Image

whipped this up in a minute cos research is boring and im procrastinating

you cant tell me this looks as dramatic as OPs graph
Image
User avatar
Gek
RealGM
Posts: 38,024
And1: 1,807
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Contact:
       

Re: Lakers eFG% on jumpshots 

Post#10 » by Gek » Mon Feb 7, 2011 11:39 pm

Image
#teamhermes
go pens - pirates - steelers - lakers
User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,719
And1: 32,003
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: Lakers eFG% on jumpshots 

Post#11 » by Dr Aki » Tue Feb 8, 2011 12:19 am

and pau gets a pass for shooting 42.8% eFG?

pray tell; why so arbitrary?

(also; some heads are longer than others: MISLEADING!)
Image
Imadogg
Banned User
Posts: 8,179
And1: 251
Joined: Oct 24, 2010
Location: Reseda
Contact:

Re: Lakers eFG% on jumpshots 

Post#12 » by Imadogg » Tue Feb 8, 2011 12:53 am

My graph is better easily, you fail
joelafan
Banned User
Posts: 3,057
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 18, 2011

Re: Lakers eFG% on jumpshots 

Post#13 » by joelafan » Tue Feb 8, 2011 1:03 am

Our jumpshots have been spotty at best this year. That why i would like to see brown , fisher drive to the hole more and dump it off to pau and bynum then take some random 3pointer that's not in rhythm..
User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,719
And1: 32,003
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: Lakers eFG% on jumpshots 

Post#14 » by Dr Aki » Tue Feb 8, 2011 3:39 am

Imadogg wrote:My graph is better easily, you fail


if u submitted your graph in a report, you would fail the course
Image
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: Lakers eFG% on jumpshots 

Post#15 » by dockingsched » Tue Feb 8, 2011 4:47 am

haha, i don't think anyone's trying to get a grade here.

personally like the 1st one better. starting at 37% makes the differences among the players more clear instead of them getting bunched up near the top. also helps that their exact percentage is inserted.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
TyCobb
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 38,252
And1: 9,956
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Pitcher's Mound
     

Re: Lakers eFG% on jumpshots 

Post#16 » by TyCobb » Tue Feb 8, 2011 4:53 am

Would you fail the person if they didn't list the names in alphabetical order, or that doesn't really matter?

If it doesn't matter, than I think it should go from greatest to least, or the other way around. So we can process the graph more efficiently, Prof. :)
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
User avatar
LA Forever
Pro Prospect
Posts: 975
And1: 1
Joined: Oct 01, 2010
Location: Pacific Division
Contact:

Re: Lakers eFG% on jumpshots 

Post#17 » by LA Forever » Tue Feb 8, 2011 5:36 am

Barnes' is in a Magic uniform, not a Laker one. Please re-do the graph. :lol:
Basketball Reasons
Imadogg
Banned User
Posts: 8,179
And1: 251
Joined: Oct 24, 2010
Location: Reseda
Contact:

Re: Lakers eFG% on jumpshots 

Post#18 » by Imadogg » Tue Feb 8, 2011 6:12 am

TyCobb wrote:Would you fail the person if they didn't list the names in alphabetical order, or that doesn't really matter?

If it doesn't matter, than I think it should go from greatest to least, or the other way around. So we can process the graph more efficiently, Prof. :)

Oh yes, I forgot to mention I listed them by positions, PG to C. So you can see the bigmen next to each other and the guards next to each other.

And yea, I apologize to those who I've offended (Aki) for not labeling my graph. I coulda sworn I wasn't in school this qtr.

And Simoun, damn ESPN doesn't upgrade the pics much
User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,719
And1: 32,003
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: Lakers eFG% on jumpshots 

Post#19 » by Dr Aki » Tue Feb 8, 2011 7:41 am

noone was offended.

constructive criticism! constructive criticism!
Image
User avatar
Speedlot
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,164
And1: 720
Joined: Jan 01, 2007
         

Re: Lakers eFG% on jumpshots 

Post#20 » by Speedlot » Fri Feb 11, 2011 6:06 am

Get offended. All Graphs are fail. This should be from 35% to 50% only since NOBODY shoots below that. And 30 % = hot garbage Rodman to 50% Reggie Miller. The bar graph doesn't show how much a failure of a jumpshooter Luke is.
<3 YOU ALL.

Return to Los Angeles Lakers