The hearing in Jose Bautista’s salary arbitration case with the Toronto Blue Jays has been set for Monday (Feb.14) in Arizona, a major league source told FOXSports.com.
http://mlbbuzz.yardbarker.com/blog/mlbb ... ys/4129096
Moderator: JaysRule15
The hearing in Jose Bautista’s salary arbitration case with the Toronto Blue Jays has been set for Monday (Feb.14) in Arizona, a major league source told FOXSports.com.
hyper316 wrote:i think it's going to come down to 10.5 mill or getting multiyear contract. i dont think he'll be happy gettin 7.6 mill, might just pick up and leave next year.
Avenger wrote:I don't know if Bautista is too willing to sign a multi year deal anyways, the absolute maximum the Jays could and should be offering right now is like 5 years 75. But if Jose has another good year and hits 35+ homeruns he could be in line for a Jayson Werth contract especially with no third basemen and outfielders on the market next year.
dagger wrote:I'm disappointed they haven't at least talked multi-year contract. I like AA, think he's a great GM, but behind any great GM you have to have a good owner. And I despise Rogers and suspect all the talk about spending some day is just that, a smokescreen for their cheapness.
Randle McMurphy wrote:Yep. If Bautista has confidence in his abilities in 2011, there isn't much reason for him not to wait this out.
Randle McMurphy wrote:They went to arbitration because Bautista apparently believes he can make a good case that he's worth $10M in 2011. And he just may win. But if he doesn't, it doesn't mean he's going to start hating Jays management.
dagger wrote:I'm disappointed they haven't at least talked multi-year contract. I like AA, think he's a great GM, but behind any great GM you have to have a good owner. And I despise Rogers and suspect all the talk about spending some day is just that, a smokescreen for their cheapness.
DonYon wrote:I'm gonna be a little bit off-topic here, but do any of you guys think that he can ever play well enough over his career to be a hall-of-fame candidate? or is does he just not have enough prime years left? I'm looking into comparing this arbitration case to the ones that other future hall of famers, but I'm not sure if it'll be a justifiable comparison.