Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
- bigfoot
- Suns Forum Anti-Tank Commander
- Posts: 9,841
- And1: 6,493
- Joined: Sep 16, 2010
-
Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
Okay I was playing around with ESPN's mock draft machine. I managed to play it enough times to get the Suns with the number one pick. Lo and behold it had us selecting Kyrie Irving. Apparently the gurus on other mock draft sites also believe the Suns most pressing need is a PG as they have us selecting Jimmer Fredette at #13.
For the future, it seems like we are set at the 2, 3, and 5 spots. If Nash holds up, the FO extends his contract, and he continues to play at a high level we will be set at the 1 spot for another 3-4 seasons. It would be clear that we should go for a PF. But ...
If there is uncertainty with Nash after next season which do need more a PG or a PF?
For the future, it seems like we are set at the 2, 3, and 5 spots. If Nash holds up, the FO extends his contract, and he continues to play at a high level we will be set at the 1 spot for another 3-4 seasons. It would be clear that we should go for a PF. But ...
If there is uncertainty with Nash after next season which do need more a PG or a PF?
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
- Stix
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,337
- And1: 2,655
- Joined: Jul 26, 2007
- Location: Phoenix
-
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
- MrMiyagi
- Suns Forum Eternal Optimist
- Posts: 8,103
- And1: 7,647
- Joined: Jan 10, 2010
-
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
bigfoot wrote:Okay I was playing around with ESPN's mock draft machine. I managed to play it enough times to get the Suns with the number one pick. Lo and behold it had us selecting Kyrie Irving. Apparently the gurus on other mock draft sites also believe the Suns most pressing need is a PG as they have us selecting Jimmer Fredette at #13.
For the future, it seems like we are set at the 2, 3, and 5 spots. If Nash holds up, the FO extends his contract, and he continues to play at a high level we will be set at the 1 spot for another 3-4 seasons. It would be clear that we should go for a PF. But ...
If there is uncertainty with Nash after next season which do need more a PG or a PF?
I say BPA, I think a lot of others feel the same way. I'd love to have Jimmer, and then get a solid rotation big with the Orlando pick. But we'll have to wait and see how it pans out
SHAZAM!
Suns traded Mikal Bridges, Cam Johnson, Jae Crowder and 4 1st round picks and a swap so some Vegas Bookies would like us.
Suns traded Mikal Bridges, Cam Johnson, Jae Crowder and 4 1st round picks and a swap so some Vegas Bookies would like us.
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
- bigfoot
- Suns Forum Anti-Tank Commander
- Posts: 9,841
- And1: 6,493
- Joined: Sep 16, 2010
-
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
If the BPA is a 2 or 3 will he be buried behind our glut of wings?
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
- Stix
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,337
- And1: 2,655
- Joined: Jul 26, 2007
- Location: Phoenix
-
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
bigfoot wrote:If the BPA is a 2 or 3 will he be buried behind our glut of wings?
BPA meaning... Best PG/PF Available.
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
- MrMiyagi
- Suns Forum Eternal Optimist
- Posts: 8,103
- And1: 7,647
- Joined: Jan 10, 2010
-
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
phungk wrote:bigfoot wrote:If the BPA is a 2 or 3 will he be buried behind our glut of wings?
BPA meaning... Best PG/PF Available.
This
SHAZAM!
Suns traded Mikal Bridges, Cam Johnson, Jae Crowder and 4 1st round picks and a swap so some Vegas Bookies would like us.
Suns traded Mikal Bridges, Cam Johnson, Jae Crowder and 4 1st round picks and a swap so some Vegas Bookies would like us.
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
- Kerrsed
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 29,876
- And1: 16,578
- Joined: Mar 31, 2009
- Location: Land of the Internet Memes
- Contact:
-
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
I pitty our team if we extend Nash for another 4-5 years.........
.....but i do think that we will be needing a PG in the draft. The way i see it, PG/SG that are drafted come more NBA ready, where with PF/C they usually takes year and years to develop. I say grab a PG (Walker), then trade for a PF like Hickson/Thompson.
Walker/Dragic/Childress/Hickson/Gortat.
.....but i do think that we will be needing a PG in the draft. The way i see it, PG/SG that are drafted come more NBA ready, where with PF/C they usually takes year and years to develop. I say grab a PG (Walker), then trade for a PF like Hickson/Thompson.
Walker/Dragic/Childress/Hickson/Gortat.
Its #DUMPSTERFIRE SEASON! #TeamTRAINWRECK -KERRSED- The Mod, The Myth, The Legend


Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
-
- Suns Forum College Scout
- Posts: 17,171
- And1: 6,905
- Joined: Jun 25, 2009
- Location: the Arizona desert
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
bigfoot wrote:Okay I was playing around with ESPN's mock draft machine. I managed to play it enough times to get the Suns with the number one pick. Lo and behold it had us selecting Kyrie Irving. Apparently the gurus on other mock draft sites also believe the Suns most pressing need is a PG as they have us selecting Jimmer Fredette at #13.
For the future, it seems like we are set at the 2, 3, and 5 spots. If Nash holds up, the FO extends his contract, and he continues to play at a high level we will be set at the 1 spot for another 3-4 seasons. It would be clear that we should go for a PF. But ...
If there is uncertainty with Nash after next season which do need more a PG or a PF?
Who are the current 2 and 3 you're talking about? Hill is almost 40, Dudley is a great backup and Pietrus sucks...
Looking around at some mocks i see one of them giving us Jimmer which is okay with me. Players they have after him are Kemba Walker and Klay Thompson who i love. I just like Terrance Jones, John Henson and Harrison Barnes. I'd really like to fill PG, SG, SF or PF with our lottery pick and pair VC plus ORL 1st to fill another one. Maybe another with the MLE.
nbadraft.net and DraftExpress both have us taking the Jimmer!
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
- lilfishi22
- Forum Mod - Suns
- Posts: 36,206
- And1: 24,563
- Joined: Oct 16, 2007
- Location: Australia
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
In terms of need, I think we need a PF more. Some size at the 4 spot would be nice. We're OK with Dragic at the 1 and if Dowdell comes along, he could be a decent backup to Dragic. The 4 spot is where we're a bit weak at the moment with Warrick being our only "true" PF if we don't count Lawal
BPA with PG or PF and I don't think we can go wrong.
BPA with PG or PF and I don't think we can go wrong.
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
- Nando88
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,568
- And1: 256
- Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
- impulsenine
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,272
- And1: 1
- Joined: Feb 10, 2007
- Location: Tucson
- Contact:
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
Honestly, I don't have the time/patience for it, but you know who I'd look to for advice.
San Antonio. Just analyze all their drafts from that tank for Duncan on, and you'll have as good advice as you could ask.
San Antonio. Just analyze all their drafts from that tank for Duncan on, and you'll have as good advice as you could ask.
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
- TheJohnWallShow
- Junior
- Posts: 462
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 11, 2010
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
I say get Fredette in the first, then with the Magic pick id get Kemba, Selby or Smith. 2nd rounds a crap shoot.
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 115
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 28, 2009
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
Kerrsed wrote:I pitty our team if we extend Nash for another 4-5 years.........
.....but i do think that we will be needing a PG in the draft. The way i see it, PG/SG that are drafted come more NBA ready, where with PF/C they usually takes year and years to develop. I say grab a PG (Walker), then trade for a PF like Hickson/Thompson.
Walker/Dragic/Childress/Hickson/Gortat.
Walker/DUDLEY/Childress/Hickson/Gortat
why would u play dragic with walker?
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
- mybloodisorange
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,157
- And1: 66
- Joined: Jul 17, 2010
- Location: Cloud 9
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
I would take the best PG, SF or PF available period. I feel that moving forward to start the rebuilding Gortat and Dudley should be the building blocks everyone else is expendable. With Nash and Hill retiring soon and Carter coming off the books this year and Pietrus the next we are in decent shape finacially; the only 2 bad contracts we have at this point are Warrik and JChill and if Chill is givin a solid 16-28 min a game backing up the 2-3 he may be able to start earning his contract once VC and pietrus are gone.
And I dont know why everyone keeps saying Dudley is "a good backup" the man put up good numbers every time he started with us as well as off the bench. Sure he isnt athletic but if his IQ, hustle and skill hasnt made you a believer by now i dont know what would short of being 8 feet tall.
And I dont know why everyone keeps saying Dudley is "a good backup" the man put up good numbers every time he started with us as well as off the bench. Sure he isnt athletic but if his IQ, hustle and skill hasnt made you a believer by now i dont know what would short of being 8 feet tall.
Everybody dies but not everybody truly lives.
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
- Wannabe MEP
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,152
- And1: 1,852
- Joined: Sep 29, 2010
- Location: Idaho
-
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
Anyone else seen this?
http://82games.com/bestdraftingteams.htm
Ranks teams' success in the draft from 1989-2008.
1) Milwaukee
2) Phoenix
3) L.A. Lakers
4) San Antonio
Obviously a wee bit arbitrary. But still. You can't expect us to consistently get Steve Nash-types with mediocre picks. Can't turn crap into gold, and it's a statistical law that you should expect crap from the draft. I recommend LOWERED EXPECTATIONS.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTBObmbe83A&feature=related[/youtube]
http://82games.com/bestdraftingteams.htm
Ranks teams' success in the draft from 1989-2008.
1) Milwaukee
2) Phoenix
3) L.A. Lakers
4) San Antonio
Obviously a wee bit arbitrary. But still. You can't expect us to consistently get Steve Nash-types with mediocre picks. Can't turn crap into gold, and it's a statistical law that you should expect crap from the draft. I recommend LOWERED EXPECTATIONS.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTBObmbe83A&feature=related[/youtube]
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,178
- And1: 3,609
- Joined: Feb 28, 2010
- Location: Kentucky Suns
- Contact:
-
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
mybloodisorange wrote:I would take the best PG, SF or PF available period. I feel that moving forward to start the rebuilding Gortat and Dudley should be the building blocks everyone else is expendable. With Nash and Hill retiring soon and Carter coming off the books this year and Pietrus the next we are in decent shape finacially; the only 2 bad contracts we have at this point are Warrik and JChill and if Chill is givin a solid 16-28 min a game backing up the 2-3 he may be able to start earning his contract once VC and pietrus are gone.
And I dont know why everyone keeps saying Dudley is "a good backup" the man put up good numbers every time he started with us as well as off the bench. Sure he isnt athletic but if his IQ, hustle and skill hasnt made you a believer by now i dont know what would short of being 8 feet tall.
I have absolutely no problem with Dudley starting for us, and I doubt Los Soles will either. Dudley playing next to NAsh will make him a deadly threat from outside. I actually think that Dudley starting at the Sg would be an upgrade over J-Rich when he was with us, purely because even though they do the same thing on offence, Dudley's defence and BBIQ is way higher than J-Rich's.
I wouldn't be upset if we went into next season with this lineup
Nash/Dragic/Pick
Dudley/Pietrus
Hill/Chilly
Frye/FA(Mbah a Moute?)/Pick
Gortat/ Lopez
MrMiyagi wrote:Lob to DA for the win
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
- Sun Scorched
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,736
- And1: 280
- Joined: Aug 01, 2007
-
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
Da_Reel_Kboy wrote:I have absolutely no problem with Dudley starting for us, and I doubt Los Soles will either. Dudley playing next to NAsh will make him a deadly threat from outside. I actually think that Dudley starting at the Sg would be an upgrade over J-Rich when he was with us, purely because even though they do the same thing on offence, Dudley's defence and BBIQ is way higher than J-Rich's.
I wouldn't be upset if we went into next season with this lineup
Nash/Dragic/Pick
Dudley/Pietrus
Hill/Chilly
Frye/FA(Mbah a Moute?)/Pick
Gortat/ Lopez
I really like the way that looks. If we keep the cap holds we'll have in place without renouncing them, we can sign someone to the MLE and still be well under the lux tax.
My money is on a serious MLE target. Don't think we'll go the cap space route. We'll also have the Bi-Annual Exp to use on a player for roughly $2m.
I'd be really interested in what we could get in a DEN/Whoever trade for taking on Harrington with our TPE. It would have to be icing, but the guy is still playing at a high level.

On Steve Nash:
G35 wrote:He may run a great offense but I wouldn't choose him over Amare to start a team.
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
- JohnVancouver
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,016
- And1: 236
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
- Location: Vancouver, BC
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
What about KMart and Al for Vince and Warrick? Works for salary, they get out from under Al's salary, we swap big expirings
We get two bigs with different skill sets and KMart would likely comeback more fully here with our staff. He could be a beast for us
just a thought
We get two bigs with different skill sets and KMart would likely comeback more fully here with our staff. He could be a beast for us
just a thought
"Deng and Mozgov was some 1980s Clippers sh*t. So, so dumb" - Sedale Threatt
"If you can't get banned for threatening to rape a mod, what can you get banned for?" Jigga_Man/2013
"Everybody love Everybody." - Jackie Moon
"If you can't get banned for threatening to rape a mod, what can you get banned for?" Jigga_Man/2013
"Everybody love Everybody." - Jackie Moon
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
- harshey1388
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,818
- And1: 249
- Joined: Oct 26, 2008
- Location: Phoenix/Tucson
- Contact:
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
JohnVancouver wrote:What about KMart and Al for Vince and Warrick? Works for salary, they get out from under Al's salary, we swap big expirings
We get two bigs with different skill sets and KMart would likely comeback more fully here with our staff. He could be a beast for us
just a thought
i like Al but if we are trying to keep our core guys next season then i dont want KMart here. Chemistry is huge on our team and we can see that better than ever this season. KMart is just too 'thug' for the Suns. i sure do like the Al idea though!
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
- Sun Scorched
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,736
- And1: 280
- Joined: Aug 01, 2007
-
Re: Mock Draft Lottery (PG vs PF)
harshey1388 wrote:JohnVancouver wrote:What about KMart and Al for Vince and Warrick? Works for salary, they get out from under Al's salary, we swap big expirings
We get two bigs with different skill sets and KMart would likely comeback more fully here with our staff. He could be a beast for us
just a thought
i like Al but if we are trying to keep our core guys next season then i dont want KMart here. Chemistry is huge on our team and we can see that better than ever this season. KMart is just too 'thug' for the Suns. i sure do like the Al idea though!
Coud Martin play? Sure. But I think JohnnyV is going for him more as an expriring.
I like it from the Suns standpoint. Never thought about it this way.

On Steve Nash:
G35 wrote:He may run a great offense but I wouldn't choose him over Amare to start a team.