ImageImageImageImageImage

a SF shooter

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

Patterns
Banned User
Posts: 6,008
And1: 18
Joined: Sep 19, 2007

Re: a SF shooter 

Post#21 » by Patterns » Fri Feb 11, 2011 9:29 pm

joelafan wrote:Iggy? His nba future is done in philly and he can score when hes intrested in the game and i dont think we would have to trade a leg and arm for him either. Afflalo isnt coming to la. i wish. Hes going be the franchise player after melo leaves.

:lol:
frozt
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,905
And1: 1,283
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: God's green earth.
       

Re: a SF shooter 

Post#22 » by frozt » Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:04 pm

guds wrote:dare I say this:

LARRY HUGHES. Look at this sight:

Image


Defense:

Artest>Hughes>Barnes

Shooting:

Barnes>/= Hughes>Artest

Passing:

Hughes>Barnes>Artest

Will be back with the numbers. :P



Uhh did you really just suggest Larry Freaking Hughes, Barnes is a better defender then him as well so you have that wrong too.
Resident band wagon vigilante.
User avatar
Crooked-I
General Manager
Posts: 8,118
And1: 2,686
Joined: Jun 23, 2006
Location: Eastside Long Beach
     

Re: a SF shooter 

Post#23 » by Crooked-I » Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:28 pm

Tayshaun Prince. Not gonna happen but he'd be perfect for our team.
LAKER FAN FOR LIFE

RIP Kobe and Gigi
User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,719
And1: 32,002
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: a SF shooter 

Post#24 » by Dr Aki » Fri Feb 11, 2011 11:10 pm

larry hughes was a cancer because of his albatross contract.

if he was on the minimum/LLE he'd be value for money
Image
The Skyhook
RealGM
Posts: 11,432
And1: 925
Joined: Sep 16, 2008
 

Re: a SF shooter 

Post#25 » by The Skyhook » Sat Feb 12, 2011 12:00 am

SlavaMedvedenko wrote:How is Jared Dudley realistic? He's young, on a very reasonable contract on a team trying to make the playoffs.

I'd love Dudley but with Artest and Barnes on the team it just doesn't seem realistic. I think it would be better to go with a backup SG that can help stretch the floor. If he had good decision making that would be even better.
joe.linnen
Banned User
Posts: 3,272
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 25, 2006
Location: Fresno

Re: a SF shooter 

Post#26 » by joe.linnen » Sat Feb 12, 2011 4:25 am

Hughes would be good he can play three positions
User avatar
tugs
RealGM
Posts: 16,891
And1: 2,999
Joined: Jul 22, 2010

Re: a SF shooter 

Post#27 » by tugs » Sat Feb 12, 2011 5:37 am

Aki wrote:larry hughes was a cancer because of his albatross contract.

if he was on the minimum/LLE he'd be value for money


This.

frozt wrote:Uhh did you really just suggest Larry Freaking Hughes, Barnes is a better defender then him as well so you have that wrong too.


Yes I did. As for the defense part, Barnes is more like of a Sasha type defender, pesky and gets in your head like Artest. Hughes plays fundamental D, keeps his man in front of him, though he gambles at the passing lanes at times.
User avatar
TruSkool
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,706
And1: 253
Joined: Jun 01, 2007
 

Re: a SF shooter 

Post#28 » by TruSkool » Sun Feb 13, 2011 4:45 pm

i got it....GRANT HILL
lakeshow248
Senior
Posts: 642
And1: 1
Joined: May 08, 2007

Re: a SF shooter 

Post#29 » by lakeshow248 » Mon Feb 14, 2011 12:00 am

James Posey in a trade for Artest. Posey and Barnes would be really nice additions. Posey getting zero time in Indy. Contract has two years at 6.4 then 6.9. Ron has two years at 6.3 and 6.7 with a player opt for two additional years. He might opt out knowing him.

Josh Howard makes 3 million, expiring contract, on WSH. He is solid player when healthy coming off big knee injury but prob could be had for a pick and trade exemption.

A perfect, triangle, point guard would be shaun livingston 6-7 and is player great in last couple of weeks for Charlotte. I watched Bobcats and Cs and he gave Rondo a headache all night back downs, got to the line just high IQ. He makes 3.5 million over nxt 2 years w/ a team opt for third.
User avatar
kobe808lak
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,686
And1: 601
Joined: Mar 05, 2008

Re: a SF shooter 

Post#30 » by kobe808lak » Mon Feb 14, 2011 7:54 pm

We had one in Rad..but the problem was he couldn't guard his shadow. He need a defensive SF that can actually shoot the damn ball.
User avatar
Jase
RealGM
Posts: 13,051
And1: 158
Joined: Aug 01, 2008
Location: Grand Rapids, MI.

Re: a SF shooter 

Post#31 » by Jase » Wed Feb 16, 2011 7:17 pm

chefy wrote:I'm pretty sure Artest,Barnes>>>whoever shooter we can get.


This. Unless it's a clear upgrade, it doesn't make sense. I'd rather have Barnes on the floor than someone like Devean George or freakin Novak.
"A winner listens. A loser just waits until it's their turn to talk."

Return to Los Angeles Lakers