New Jersey would not be in the playoffs without Brodeur.
End of Discussion
Brodeur
- timd1218
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 2,380
- And1: 0
- Joined: Mar 24, 2005
- Location: I will eat your soul.
- Contact:
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,832
- And1: 187
- Joined: Dec 10, 2006
timd1218 wrote:New Jersey would not be in the playoffs without Brodeur.
End of Discussion
whats your point?
Thats doesnt make him the best goalie in the world. Vancouver would be a bottom 4 team in the league without Luongo, San Jose would be a borderline playoff team without Nabakov, same with the Rangers and Lundqvist.
Your saying that New Jersey couldnt be just as good with Lundqvist or Luongo as there goalie?
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 20,907
- And1: 3,396
- Joined: Dec 29, 2005
- Location: Jurassic Park
-
Brouder would be a stud on a team like Detroit, Pittsburgh, Ottawa, New York, Philly or even San Jose look at his team. Place him on a team that can score and he would be I think the best in the NHL.
2.17 GAA this season is damn good with no real defense to speak off I mean what more do you want from him?
2.17 GAA this season is damn good with no real defense to speak off I mean what more do you want from him?
Lord Leoshes wrote:i personally would rather keep Chalmers over Lowry
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,832
- And1: 187
- Joined: Dec 10, 2006
xbl_sucks wrote:Brouder would be a stud on a team like Detroit, Pittsburgh, Ottawa, New York, Philly or even San Jose look at his team. Place him on a team that can score and he would be I think the best in the NHL.
2.17 GAA this season is damn good with no real defense to speak off I mean what more do you want from him?
Who cares the same thing could be said if you put Luongo or Lundqvist on the Wings. Hmm If I was a Devils fan id prolly like for him to actually show up once the playoffs start seeing people call him the best goalie in the world.
Return to The General NHL Board