Player you'd most/least want traded before the deadline

Bac2Basics · Post #1 » by **Bac2Basics** » Sat Feb 12, 2011 10:22 pm

As far as least traded, Evans and Cousins are a little too obvious as far as answers so other than those guys.....

While I think there's reasons to be pleased with as far as the progression of the KIngs so far this season, I think most Kings fans would agree that some trades or other moves would be a welcome event.

While I think Kings fans are in basic agreement that both Tyreke Evans and Demarcus Cousins are basically untradeable, the rest of the team may present some interesting debate.

Casspi or Greene more likely to be a long term SF?
Thompson or Landry a better choice as a PF?
Whiteside take too long to develop?
Is it time to trade Udrih while his value's higher or does he mesh too well with Evans?
Is Garcia's leadership valuable enough to keep him?

SacKingZZZ · Post #2 » by **SacKingZZZ** » Sun Feb 13, 2011 12:21 am

Can't let Landry go for nothing. So I'd have to say I want to see him dealt because I don't think re-signing him is a step in the right direction and him re-signing here isn't going to happen if he has a say I would bet unless he's our PF moving forward.

Sacramento_King · Post #3 » by **Sacramento_King** » Sun Feb 13, 2011 12:56 am

I say you keep Cousins, Evans, Casspi and JT. I think JT and Casspi just need some consistent minutes and let the four grow together on the court. Anybody else is movable especially Udrih and Cisco. We don't really need older style vets who have large contract so if we could move them, do it. Landry is movable but being a free agent lowers his potential return. Whiteside and Greene probably have more value to the Kings then they would get in a deal. Dally, Beno, Landry and Cisco should be dealt.

Silver Man · Post #4 » by **Silver Man** » Sun Feb 13, 2011 1:04 am

Cousins would be my top player for us to keep and Landry would be the player I'd most want us to ship off.

Bac2Basics · Post #5 » by **Bac2Basics** » Sun Feb 13, 2011 4:34 am

I think Thompson & Casspi, could be dealt, but it's one of those "means more to us than to you" deals with them. It's unlikely that they go anywhere.

Udrih & Garcia should probably be traded despite their current veteran leadership values, the core of the team is significantly younger.

ADoaN17 · Post #6 » by **ADoaN17** » Sun Feb 13, 2011 6:18 am

JT, Landry, and maybe Casspi if we can get good value out of him.

down_el_road · Post #7 » by **down_el_road** » Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:45 am

Get Donte and or Cisco out of here, no need for their mediocre offense.

SacKingZZZ · Post #8 » by **SacKingZZZ** » Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:58 am

We still need Cisco for his mediocre leadership though.

twoolfork1 · Post #9 » by **twoolfork1** » Sun Feb 13, 2011 6:31 pm

I want Landry traded. I don't like his style of play and it hasn't been effective in this offense.

RIPskaterdude · Post #10 » by **RIPskaterdude** » Sun Feb 13, 2011 7:41 pm

Something tells me that as soon as Landry is traded to a team with a decent coach and an actual offensive system, he'll go back to putting up 15/5 every night.

Our only choice is to trade him to a WORSE team with a WORSE coach.

The only problem is....where exactly is that? :dontknow:

Website · Post #11 » by **Nicky Nix Nook** » Sun Feb 13, 2011 7:43 pm

xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:Something tells me that as soon as Landry is traded to a team with a decent coach and an actual offensive system, he'll go back to putting up 15/5 every night.

Our only choice is to trade him to a WORSE team with a WORSE coach.

The only problem is....where exactly is that?

Detroit.

RIPskaterdude · Post #12 » by **RIPskaterdude** » Sun Feb 13, 2011 7:46 pm

Hmmm, maybe, but Landry + Monroe seems like it would work too well. Pass.

down_el_road · Post #13 » by **down_el_road** » Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:07 pm

SacKingZZZ wrote:We still need Cisco for his mediocre leadership though.

Put him on the coaching staff then because he's a terrible player.

inquisitive · Post #14 » by **inquisitive** » Sun Feb 13, 2011 11:50 pm

Kings need a good pt. guard. They should renew their interest for Aaron Brooks. A Brooks and Jordan Hill for Cousins trade would be good for both teams.

Bac2Basics · Post #15 » by **Bac2Basics** » Sun Feb 13, 2011 11:57 pm

inquisitive wrote:Kings need a good pt. guard. They should renew their interest for Aaron Brooks. A Brooks and Jordan Hill for Cousins trade would be good for both teams.

There's no way Sacramento signs off on that deal.

rpa · Post #16 » by **rpa** » Mon Feb 14, 2011 1:31 am

inquisitive wrote:Kings need a good pt. guard. They should renew their interest for Aaron Brooks. A Brooks and Jordan Hill for Cousins trade would be good for both teams.

Put down the crack pipe Rockets fan.

BLACKFEET 2010 · Post #17 » by **BLACKFEET 2010** » Mon Feb 14, 2011 1:04 pm

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachi ... Id=6ey2e9a

Wouldya?

dozencousins · Post #18 » by **dozencousins** » Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:49 pm

Not even close ! That is way undervaluing the Kings players in the deal !

The Beam King · Post #19 » by **The Beam King** » Mon Feb 14, 2011 6:18 pm

inquisitive wrote:Kings need a good pt. guard. They should renew their interest for Aaron Brooks. A Brooks and Jordan Hill for Cousins trade would be good for both teams.

Your ability to assess NBA players trade value is equivalent to the US government's ability to curb the debt, non-existent.

Cliff Levingston · Post #20 » by **Cliff Levingston** » Mon Feb 14, 2011 7:31 pm

What's the deal with Garcia and his injuries? Cliff Levingston could see him being a nice fit on the Bulls, at the right price of course, assuming his injuries aren't serious.