Post#608 » by Fat Man » Mon Feb 14, 2011 8:59 pm
From Sheridan's chat today:
Amir NY [via mobile]
RE: Melo's recent comment about maybe resigning in Denver. Could he possibly be tricking the Nuggets into believing him and in the end, leave them with nothing, after hearing so many undesirable teams being mentioned in his possible trade? His body language in games seems to indicate he is very irritated with all this Denver nonsense.
Chris Sheridan
(2:14 PM)
He has always said publicly he is keeping all his options open, so that comment did not strike me as too much of a departure from what he had been saying publicly all season. As for his body language, all I can read is the language of a guy who has been tearing it up. As as I wrote in my most recent Knicks column on the ESPNNework site, the Knicks are making a massive mistake if they are unwilling to budge off a lowball offer. I imagine three words sum it up best: To Be Continued ...
Chris (NJ)
Where will Steve Nash end up this summer. Do you think the Lakers can get him.
Chris Sheridan
(2:33 PM)
If the Knicks succeed in getting Amar'e (I think he meant Melo), I expect them to target Nash as the final piece. He'll come cheaper than either Dwight/Deron/CP3 as UFA in '12, for whom Knicks would have to clear virtually everyone off their payroll a la what the Heat did last summer.
Fred (Brooklyn)
What's the consensus around the league -- executives or players -- on what the Knicks should do?
Chris Sheridan
(2:43 PM)
As Kobe Bryant said at MSG on Friday night, the Knicks have a few nice pieces, but who are we kidding? He, like most folks around the NBA, believe they should do whatever is necessary to get Melo and team him with Amar'e for the next four-plus years. It's the only way they have a whiff of a chance against Miami while their big three is under contract.
JD (VA)
This whole drama with Melo and the Nuggets reminds me a few years back to Kobe and the Lakers. Does this make like an accurate correlation and if so does the outcome stay true where the Nuggets end up keeping Melo?
Chris Sheridan
(2:48 PM)
That one lasted a long time too, the entire summer actually, and didn't die until the eve of the regular season. But that one was much more under the radar than this one, which has been a season-long story since the preseason. As for the outcome, I see that being determined by whether the Knicks are willing to make a realistically fair offer. Denver will not trade him for only Curry, Chandler and Randolph, IMO, because they'd be getting fleeced, would look like fools and would alienate their fan base. They would be better off keeping him, rolling the dice in the playoffs and then seeing whether the pressure of letting all that money go would force Anthony into either signing, or amending his contract after the season and dropping his ETO, which would make him trade-eligible again from the end of the season through June 30.
David (New York)
Seems like Donnie Walsh is just waiting until closer to deadline to show his hand. Doesn't make sense to do it now since Denver will wait til next week anyway. Your thoughts?
Chris Sheridan
(2:59 PM)
Certainly seems that way, but not a lot of people know exactly what combinations of players Donnie has put out there, and which long contracts the Nuggets want him to take back along with Melo. Remember, if Knicks have to take back long money (such as Al Harrington), it impedes their future cap flexibility and their ability to get a third max player. But at the end of the day, I say a three-max goal is a pipe-dream for them, and if they have to take on Al H., go ahead and do it and try to keep him and Mike D'Antoni from being alone too long in a room together. Then go and try to get Nash over the summer.