Study of Baseball America's Top 100 prospects list 1990-2003
Moderator: JaysRule15
Study of Baseball America's Top 100 prospects list 1990-2003
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,380
- And1: 22
- Joined: Jan 21, 2007
Re: Study of Baseball America's Top 100 prospects list 1990-2003
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,696
- And1: 330
- Joined: Jun 25, 2009
-
Re: Study of Baseball America's Top 100 prospects list 1990-2003
that is quite depressing... but not that surprising since baseball is so injury riddled, and one bad tweak or slump can ruin an entire career.
Re: Study of Baseball America's Top 100 prospects list 1990-2003
- Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,580
- And1: 18,065
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
-
Re: Study of Baseball America's Top 100 prospects list 1990-2003
Honestly, the success rate for position players is higher than imagined, especially at the top end...having one in three position players ranked (at some point) in the top 20 turn into 2.5+ WAR guys isn't that bad.
And on the pitchers, yeah...there's no such thing as a pitching prospect and all that.
And on the pitchers, yeah...there's no such thing as a pitching prospect and all that.

**** your asterisk.
Re: Study of Baseball America's Top 100 prospects list 1990-2003
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,500
- And1: 21,688
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Study of Baseball America's Top 100 prospects list 1990-2003
Yeah, this is why I wasn't exactly a fan of trading a proven, good pitcher in Marcum straight up for Lawrie. I understand the motivation of the deal, but prospects fail with regularity.
It seems to me that sometimes people take it for granted that these guys will pan out, and most of the time they just don't.
It seems to me that sometimes people take it for granted that these guys will pan out, and most of the time they just don't.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Study of Baseball America's Top 100 prospects list 1990-2003
-
- Junior
- Posts: 358
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 08, 2010
Re: Study of Baseball America's Top 100 prospects list 1990-2003
I used to study the top 100 lists years ago and one of the most important points to keep in mind is that a lot of guys make it to the big leagues...and are even all stars, and were never even on the top 100 list. I haven't followed the lists so much in recent years...but it wouldn't surprise me if Bautista was never on any top 100 lists and he was in the MVP discussions this year. How about John Buck who was the catcher at the all star game...again i wouldn't be surprised if he was never on any top 100 lists. And there's always many many more that make significant contributions in the majors that were never on any top 100 lists. BA does a great job, but the number of guys they miss is a lot!
I wonder if Thames will be on the top 100 list this year. I doubt it...yet he looks poised to be a solid hitter in the bigs. Sometimes they miss the really obvious guys because they focus a bit too much on upside. The hard working, grind it out type of guys that methodically pound away to make the bigs are often missed. As well, late bloomers get missed.
Was Adam lind ever on a top 100? Anyways, some of the guys i mention may have been, but just making the point, there are many others to find if you spend the time.
I wonder if Thames will be on the top 100 list this year. I doubt it...yet he looks poised to be a solid hitter in the bigs. Sometimes they miss the really obvious guys because they focus a bit too much on upside. The hard working, grind it out type of guys that methodically pound away to make the bigs are often missed. As well, late bloomers get missed.
Was Adam lind ever on a top 100? Anyways, some of the guys i mention may have been, but just making the point, there are many others to find if you spend the time.