ImageImageImageImageImage

[Camelo Thread Part 21] - Knicks Met With Melo Thursday

Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85

Falstaffxx
Banned User
Posts: 9,153
And1: 165
Joined: Sep 27, 2010

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 21] - Knicks Met With Melo Thursday 

Post#1081 » by Falstaffxx » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:43 am

seren wrote:
shtolky wrote:I never said anything about a max player...but there is only one team that has 3 max players and that was unprecedented. I think we are getting greedy...ok so we'll have Melo, A'mare, young talent and money to throw at a very good player. What's with this 3 max or bust bs? It's mind boggling that people are still complaining about possibly getting A'mare and Melo, yet ruining our chances at a 3rd max player...astonishing. Over Gallo and Chandler? Really???


this has nothing to do with being greedy. amare+melo with bunch of scrubs = fail.


That's true, but we know Billups and Fields aren't scrubs, and we're hoping Mozgov becomes a good player.
User avatar
TKF
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 63,138
And1: 116
Joined: May 21, 2001
Location: Atlanta GA, via The Bronx.

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 21] - Knicks Met With Melo Thursday 

Post#1082 » by TKF » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:43 am

Jay10 wrote:if the trade goes through, gallo is going to torch the knicks in the next nuggets vs knicks game.

lol


AS bart scott said "CAN'T WAIT"!!!!!!!!
Image
seren
RealGM
Posts: 24,720
And1: 4,949
Joined: Jul 21, 2002

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 21] - Knicks Met With Melo Thursday 

Post#1083 » by seren » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:43 am

GONYK wrote:
Letsbereality wrote:
He choose security and a sure thing can't blame him for that. Why should he take a chance on the Nuggets calling his bluff and keeping him the whole season? He's a multi time allstar and he deserves to be compensated as such. Potentially allowing himself to lose money seems like too much so I find nothing wrong with him establishing and forcing the issue getting what he wants. Does it suck that we lose some players yeah sure but we'd lose some regardless so no real sweat off my back.

It's no sweat off your back because you aren't thinking longterm. Melo screwed his future team's competetive chances just to get his. He made himself bigger than NYK. For that, f*ck him. If he put himself out there this much, he should have done it all the way and made sure he had the strongest team possible to come to.

Also the notion that we need the assets to get Paul or whatever is weird. I find it hard to believe we'd be able to trade for CP3,Deron, or Dwight with just Fields,Gallo, and Billups.
People who think we are getting a third MAX are clueless


not only we are not getting a third max, our team is reduced to amare+melo plus scrubs.

i hold out hope that billups will demand a buyout if trade goes through.
cgmw
RealGM
Posts: 22,545
And1: 10,445
Joined: Jul 23, 2003
Location: Winning now since 1973
Contact:
 

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 21] - Knicks Met With Melo Thursday 

Post#1084 » by cgmw » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:43 am

paul07ss wrote:Image


About that time.
bigfnjoe96
General Manager
Posts: 7,912
And1: 3,948
Joined: Jul 02, 2009
       

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 21] - Knicks Met With Melo Thursday 

Post#1085 » by bigfnjoe96 » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:44 am

Can people stop talking about 3 MAX Players. Is what the HEAT did the NEW measuring stick to achieve championships?
Image
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 67,011
And1: 45,780
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 21] - Knicks Met With Melo Thursday 

Post#1086 » by GONYK » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:44 am

MKCATL wrote:
seren wrote:
shtolky wrote:I never said anything about a max player...but there is only one team that has 3 max players and that was unprecedented. I think we are getting greedy...ok so we'll have Melo, A'mare, young talent and money to throw at a very good player. What's with this 3 max or bust bs? It's mind boggling that people are still complaining about possibly getting A'mare and Melo, yet ruining our chances at a 3rd max player...astonishing. Over Gallo and Chandler? Really???


this has nothing to do with being greedy. amare+melo with bunch of scrubs = fail.



Come'on we have fields and Moz.

And no bench, and we don't play defense.

Too early to start hanging banners?
Knicker23
General Manager
Posts: 9,524
And1: 139
Joined: Apr 24, 2010

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 21] - Knicks Met With Melo Thursday 

Post#1087 » by Knicker23 » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:44 am

GONYK wrote:]People who think we are getting a third MAX are clueless


We give up Gallo and now suddenly the whole plan we've been setting up for is clueless.. I bet Melo becomes a lot worse with Gallo gone too.... probably loses a few inches off his vertical.

You guys are getting way to suicidal around here.
seren
RealGM
Posts: 24,720
And1: 4,949
Joined: Jul 21, 2002

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 21] - Knicks Met With Melo Thursday 

Post#1088 » by seren » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:45 am

Falstaffxx wrote:
seren wrote:
shtolky wrote:I never said anything about a max player...but there is only one team that has 3 max players and that was unprecedented. I think we are getting greedy...ok so we'll have Melo, A'mare, young talent and money to throw at a very good player. What's with this 3 max or bust bs? It's mind boggling that people are still complaining about possibly getting A'mare and Melo, yet ruining our chances at a 3rd max player...astonishing. Over Gallo and Chandler? Really???


this has nothing to do with being greedy. amare+melo with bunch of scrubs = fail.


That's true, but we know Billups and Fields aren't scrubs, and we're hoping Mozgov becomes a good player.


which part of denver still wants fields + mozgov you did not hear? denver wants, denver gets. dolan is bending over and opening up his cheeks as we speak.
User avatar
TKF
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 63,138
And1: 116
Joined: May 21, 2001
Location: Atlanta GA, via The Bronx.

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 21] - Knicks Met With Melo Thursday 

Post#1089 » by TKF » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:45 am

not only we are not getting a third max, our team is reduced to amare+melo plus scrubs.

i hold out hope that billups will demand a buyout if trade goes through.


I hope billups doesn't report, and that douglas becomes our fulltime PG.... hahaha.. that would be great.. Honestly, billups should just threaten to retire..
Image
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 67,011
And1: 45,780
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 21] - Knicks Met With Melo Thursday 

Post#1090 » by GONYK » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:45 am

Knicker23 wrote:
GONYK wrote:]People who think we are getting a third MAX are clueless


We give up Gallo and now suddenly the whole plan we've been setting up for is clueless.. I bet Melo becomes a lot worse with Gallo gone too.... probably loses a few inches off his vertical.

You guys are getting way to suicidal around here.

Unless CP3 is coming for the MLE, it is not possible financially.

I'm emotional right now, but never irrational
seren
RealGM
Posts: 24,720
And1: 4,949
Joined: Jul 21, 2002

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 21] - Knicks Met With Melo Thursday 

Post#1091 » by seren » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:45 am

bigfnjoe96 wrote:Can people stop talking about 3 MAX Players. Is what the HEAT did the NEW measuring stick to achieve championships?


absolutely not. boston is the way to go. boston lineup has three players that they drafted/got as rookies. we will have nobody.
GnarlesOakley
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,089
And1: 253
Joined: Dec 28, 2009
Location: Bed-Stuy
         

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 21] - Knicks Met With Melo Thursday 

Post#1092 » by GnarlesOakley » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:45 am

GONYK wrote:
Letsbereality wrote:
He choose security and a sure thing can't blame him for that. Why should he take a chance on the Nuggets calling his bluff and keeping him the whole season? He's a multi time allstar and he deserves to be compensated as such. Potentially allowing himself to lose money seems like too much so I find nothing wrong with him establishing and forcing the issue getting what he wants. Does it suck that we lose some players yeah sure but we'd lose some regardless so no real sweat off my back.

It's no sweat off your back because you aren't thinking longterm. Melo screwed his future team's competetive chances just to get his. He made himself bigger than NYK. For that, f*ck him. If he put himself out there this much, he should have done it all the way and made sure he had the strongest team possible to come to.

Also the notion that we need the assets to get Paul or whatever is weird. I find it hard to believe we'd be able to trade for CP3,Deron, or Dwight with just Fields,Gallo, and Billups.
People who think we are getting a third MAX are clueless

Thank you. I've said it all along, Melo's actions look like someone who wants to exert his power because he missed out on the summer circus, not someone looking for a ring.

The way this is heading Melo and Amare are always going to be the also-rans to the three queens in Miami. As much as I hate Lebron, Bosh and Wade, they gamed the system perfectly to ensure flexibility around them. The 3 in Boston did an even better job at that. That's not the case here.
jamrock1975
Senior
Posts: 505
And1: 1
Joined: May 14, 2010

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 21] - Knicks Met With Melo Thursday 

Post#1093 » by jamrock1975 » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:46 am

well we can foget about adding Chris Paul or Deron Williams or Dwight Howard, because unless their is a hard cap of $65M or$70M we have no shot because Utah, Orlando or New Orleans are not going to let those players just walk away for nothing and unfortunately we don't have any assets to trade for them. I hear these idiots on the radio calling up saying trade everyone on the roster except for Stoudemire and what they fail to realize is that those players are not just for playing on the team but for potential trade chips. This trade will set us back two years minimum. Carmelo Anthony refuses to use his contract extension as leverage he pretty much said he doesn't want to go about it like that. Well stop all of this talk about championships
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 138,845
And1: 137,951
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 21] - Knicks Met With Melo Thursday 

Post#1094 » by god shammgod » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:46 am

TKF wrote:
Jay10 wrote:if the trade goes through, gallo is going to torch the knicks in the next nuggets vs knicks game.

lol


AS bart scott said "CAN'T WAIT"!!!!!!!!


so you'd rather see denver win with gallo then the knicks without him ?
Rodimus921
Veteran
Posts: 2,844
And1: 153
Joined: Jul 01, 2003
Location: The Bronx

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 21] - Knicks Met With Melo Thursday 

Post#1095 » by Rodimus921 » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:47 am

Let's just say that the Knicks make the deal for melo in order to sign another superstar we can just sign cheap role players and go over the cap so then a possible sign and trade for Paul or Howard could happen.
Image
seren
RealGM
Posts: 24,720
And1: 4,949
Joined: Jul 21, 2002

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 21] - Knicks Met With Melo Thursday 

Post#1096 » by seren » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:47 am

GnarlesOakley wrote:Thank you. I've said it all along, Melo's actions look like someone who wants to exert his power because he missed out on the summer circus, not someone looking for a ring.

The way this is heading Melo and Amare are always going to be the also-rans to the three queens in Miami. As much as I hate Lebron, Bosh and Wade, they gamed the system perfectly to ensure flexibility around them. That's not the case here.


lbj is laughing his arse off as we speak. knicks are out until dolan sells.
NYK0605
Banned User
Posts: 1,893
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 31, 2010
Location: MSG

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 21] - Knicks Met With Melo Thursday 

Post#1097 » by NYK0605 » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:47 am

TKF wrote:
not only we are not getting a third max, our team is reduced to amare+melo plus scrubs.

i hold out hope that billups will demand a buyout if trade goes through.


I hope billups doesn't report, and that douglas becomes our fulltime PG.... hahaha.. that would be great.. Honestly, billups should just threaten to retire..

Are you a Knicks or Nuggets fan?

Talk about being overly dramatic just because Gallo is getting traded.
Knicker23
General Manager
Posts: 9,524
And1: 139
Joined: Apr 24, 2010

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 21] - Knicks Met With Melo Thursday 

Post#1098 » by Knicker23 » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:47 am

Happy to say I was in the 'Chandler crew' - these Gallo lovers are embarrassing, seriously.
Al_Bundy
Banned User
Posts: 74
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 14, 2011
Location: Chicago

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 21] - Knicks Met With Melo Thursday 

Post#1099 » by Al_Bundy » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:47 am

Wait a second. If we keep Gallinari suddenly the team will be playing defense, have a bench and be an amazing title contender?

Because that's what posters here are basically saying with their overly dramatic posts.

If you think Gallinari is some superstar ready to break out once he's traded then you need to stop drinking the kool-aid.
H_20
RealGM
Posts: 14,308
And1: 1,256
Joined: Feb 26, 2002
Location: NYC

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 21] - Knicks Met With Melo Thursday 

Post#1100 » by H_20 » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:47 am

god shammgod wrote:
TKF wrote:
Jay10 wrote:if the trade goes through, gallo is going to torch the knicks in the next nuggets vs knicks game.

lol


AS bart scott said "CAN'T WAIT"!!!!!!!!


so you'd rather see denver win with gallo then the knicks without him ?


Yeah that's just unbelievable.

Return to New York Knicks