[Camelo Thread Part 21] - Knicks Met With Melo Thursday

Falstaffxx · Post #1161 » by **Falstaffxx** » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:57 am

TKF wrote:Honestly, trade everyone.. I hope denver demands and gets fields and mozgov.... our pants are already down.. no need to hold back now..

It seems as if one facet of your flipping out is the inability tonight to differentiate between giving up a lot and having no limits.

rm57 · Post #1162 » by **rm57** » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:57 am

Please explain to me how Gallo and MAYBE Chandler next year will > Melo??

Post #1163 » by **GONYK** » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:57 am

god shammgod wrote:
i believe you and i understand your view. but that's not what everyone is mad at.

LOL,

Well, that is why I am mad :lol:

NJ_YANKEE_45 · Post #1164 » by **NJ_YANKEE_45** » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:57 am

TKF wrote:
NJ_YANKEE_45 wrote:Landry: 15 points, 6 rebounds, 3 assists, 6-8 FG, 2-3 3P,

BUT GALLO IS BETTER!

which is why denver wants him as the center piece of the deal.....

Honestly, shut up.

KnicksChamps · Post #1165 » by **KnicksChamps** » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:57 am

PLEASE GOD....let Denver refuse the offer. Gallo, Felton & Chandler? Billups doesn't have much left in him. That's too much man....too damn much.

NYK0605 · Post #1166 » by **NYK0605** » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:57 am

kane2021 wrote:Stop the baiting.

Why don't you tell that to your fellow mod TKF?

And im not going to say what I would next because it would prob. get me banned lol.

GnarlesOakley · Post #1167 » by **GnarlesOakley** » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:57 am

TKF wrote:Honestly, trade everyone.. I hope denver demands and gets fields and mozgov.... our pants are already down.. no need to hold back now..

Dolan made his bed, once again he gets to lay in it.

Post #1168 » by **Thugger HBC** » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:58 am

atlnyk wrote:Look, Fields and Mozgov have as much potential as anyone we are letting go. If they pan out(especially Mozgov), this team will be a point guard away from being filthy. Please remember that Billups still has game. Melo will take much pressure off of the rookies and his shoulders are definitely big enough. We still have Douglas, Walker, Ronnie and Williams on the bench. Plus who ever else Denver sends over. This team is not nearly as "GUTTED" as some claim it will be. We still have plenty of youth and 2 players that are at the pentacle of their positions. The Sun will rise tomorrow and I'll take my chances with Melo, gladly.

I agree, the bench is virtually intact, and the starting lineup improved.

Hard to ask for more than that.

knicksfan84 · Post #1169 » by **knicksfan84** » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:58 am

GONYK wrote: Unless CP3 is coming for the MLE, it is not possible financially.

I'm emotional right now, but never irrational

W/ A'mare, Melo, Mozgov, Fields, Douglas, a 2011 first round pick under contract, and the neccessary cap holds for being under 12 players we'd have about 50 million committed. Right now that would be 50 mil committed. That obviously won't be enough for a max, but good enough to land a very good PG. If Max contracts get rolled back enough, CP3 may think it's worth it to sign for less.

KNIXFAN_83 · Post #1170 » by **KNIXFAN_83** » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:58 am

we went from having jamal craword and zbo as our best players to having amare and melo.

STFU AND ENJOY THIS YOU UNGRATEFUL BASTARDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

H_20 · Post #1171 » by **H_20** » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:58 am

NYK0605 wrote:
kane2021 wrote:Stop the baiting.

Why don't you tell that to your fellow mod TKF?

And im not going to say what I would next because it would prob. get me banned lol.

LOL He's allowed to bait since he's a mod.

Post #1172 » by **duetta** » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:58 am

towelie wrote:If the deal was just Gallo/Chandler/1st for Melo, with no Billups/Felton included, I'd prefer that.

Right. And what I'm upset about is that the I-hole is advising the D-hole, and that I've been obsessing about a team with an owner dumber than a rock, and more naive than any of Madoff's victims.

Knicker23 · Post #1173 » by **Knicker23** » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:59 am

Falstaffxx wrote:
Knicker23 wrote:
Falstaffxx wrote:I think both of you are misinterpreting what most of this discussion is about.

I guarantee half of the people wouldn't be nearly as panicked if it were Fields in the deal instead of Gallo....It ain't about giving up too much, because any bball person would know the skill we'd be getting is worth it... it's about people not wanting to see their home grown boy Gallo leave, especially if it could have been done with out him... it's exactly as we say it is.

I'm a big Gallo fan, and my position is basically, we should make sure we keep Mozgov and one of Fields or Gallo. I'd be pleased to keep Fields because of his poise and the fact that I think he'd fit in well, and I'd be pleased to keep Gallo because I think he has huge potential etc. I would NOT include both Fields and Gallo.

And i'd agree with that. That is a rational mentality. Chandler Felton Gallo is a spendy deal, but it's worth it.... we'll have Moz, and we'll have Fields as you say, in addition to Melo and Amare, more than enough moving forward and more than enough to make it worth it.

defjux21 · Post #1174 » by **defjux21** » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:59 am

Jitpal wrote:
TKF wrote:Honestly, trade everyone.. I hope denver demands and gets fields and mozgov.... our pants are already down.. no need to hold back now..

No worries. We can get some dime a dozen role players off the scrap heap to fill in. Isiah/Dolan just need to get the deal done. -Jitpal

Jeffries will probably be bought out, Marbury is a FA, Curry is still on the team, Crawford is an expiring.

Who you gonna call?

i-say-ugh

Al_Bundy · Post #1175 » by **Al_Bundy** » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:59 am

TKF is trolling this topic hard.

god shammgod · Post #1176 » by **god shammgod** » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:59 am

look we didn't get everything we wanted but that's life, you usually don't get that.

LameDuck · Post #1177 » by **LameDuck** » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:59 am

Someone told Melo the deal.

Post #1178 » by **GONYK** » Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:59 am

knicksfan84 wrote:
GONYK wrote: Unless CP3 is coming for the MLE, it is not possible financially.

I'm emotional right now, but never irrational

W/ A'mare, Melo, Mozgov, Fields, Douglas, a 2011 first round pick under contract, and the neccessary cap holds for being under 12 players we'd have about 50 million committed. Right now that would be 50 mil committed. That obviously won't be enough for a max, but good enough to land a very good PG. If Max contracts get rolled back enough, CP3 may think it's worth it to sign for less.

You know the only PG worth getting who would be available for less than the MAX?

Staruk · Post #1179 » by **Staruk** » Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:00 am

kingmalaki · Post #1180 » by **kingmalaki** » Sat Feb 19, 2011 4:00 am

GONYK wrote:
kingmalaki wrote:Hilarious that some are hating Melon for wanting to get all of his money. The rumored package is still not enough for a top 10 player. And you are arguably getting a upgrade at PG (short term). Why should Melo shoulder the risk so you guys don't have to give fair value for him?

Because I thought a ring was more important to him than money?

He wants to get paid and win like anyone else. It's worth taking a slight paycut to add a 3rd star like the Miami guys did. But if I'm Melo I sure as hell ain't risking taking less for some average players like Gallo, especially when I don't even know how much less is.

Come on now, these players aren't studs. I'm not trying to bash your players but these are not star players that y'all are losing. Players like Gallo aren't hard to get. Stars are.