Woj: HOU still wants Asik for Lee, CHI determined to add SG

SuburbanOasis · Post #1441 » by **SuburbanOasis** » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:52 pm

DRoseNation1 wrote:
Magilla_Gorilla wrote:
BbFlyEmCeE wrote:10 MINUTES, DO SOMETHING!

LOUD NOISES!

D-E-F-E-N-S-E

Auto- tuned Barkley?

blumeany · Post #1442 » by **blumeany** » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:52 pm

It's been real. It's been fun. But it hasn't been real fun.

Post #1443 » by **Rerisen** » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:52 pm

Guy986 wrote:I can't believe the Rockets are not doing anything this trade deadline. No lee trade... no battier? WTF????

Daryl Morey...

Quick Pax, find him someone with a high PER form the D-league.

sporadiclee · Post #1444 » by **sporadiclee** » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:52 pm

Gary Washburn: According to an NBA source, Celtics are close to trading Nate Robinson. More details to come #celtics 2 minutes ago

Is it possible?

umfan83 · Post #1445 » by **umfan83** » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:52 pm

Magilla_Gorilla wrote:
umfan83 wrote:OMER BETTER GET a 30/30 TONIGHT FOR US

30 seconds each half?

lol perfect response.

blumeany · Post #1446 » by **blumeany** » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:52 pm

sporadiclee wrote:
Gary Washburn: According to an NBA source, Celtics are close to trading Nate Robinson. More details to come #celtics 2 minutes ago

Is it possible?

Bulls_Fan · Post #1447 » by **Bulls_Fan** » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:52 pm

They better not pull the, "We tried to make a deal, but they were asking for too much..we like our parts."

It may be true, but you have to give up something for someone.

Bulls need to address the SG position. Bulls have a chance to win the title this year. Why put that on hold by not acquiring a suitable SG?

Waiting for the summer (next year) is not a great idea.

Sonny_D1 · Post #1448 » by **Sonny_D1** » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:52 pm

Guy986 wrote:I can't believe the Rockets are not doing anything this trade deadline. No lee trade... no battier? WTF????

They'll do something, guaranteed.

Just won't be Lee without Asik it looks like.

Post #1449 » by **Payt10** » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:53 pm

Ugh.........

panthermark · Post #1450 » by **panthermark** » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:53 pm

I'll be bummed if we don't make a move....
Not becuase we could not find a decent value...but for the simple reason that we dumped JJ for nothing....
If Bogans starts the rest of the year....so be it...

Post #1451 » by **Rerisen** » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:53 pm

sporadiclee wrote:
Gary Washburn: According to an NBA source, Celtics are close to trading Nate Robinson. More details to come #celtics 2 minutes ago

Is it possible?

What, we got Nate Robinson!?!!

BR0D1E86 · Post #1452 » by **BR0D1E86** » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:53 pm

This board won't be alive if we stand pat. The entire off-season will be threads cussing out Asik and him not being Courtney Lee and costing us an NBA championship.

Indeed, but those posts will be stupid and I will be ignoring them.

kingmalaki · Post #1453 » by **kingmalaki** » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:53 pm

SuburbanOasis wrote:
kingmalaki wrote:
Depends on the picks. If it's yours and the Heat's then hell no. Those are near 2nd rounders. If it's the Bobcats one and one of the later ones then maybe. I think that's equal value for Lee but the issue is the Bobcats pick won't come anytime soon.

Lee is not worth a lottery pick. Which the bobcats is likely to be.

He's probably worth a top 20 pick, which is probably roughly equivalent to two low 25-30 picks.

The question is WHEN will the Bobcats pick be a lottery pick? How does trading for that pick alone help the Rockets now? The two late 1st rounders clearly don't help much.

tyrususi007 · Post #1454 » by **tyrususi007** » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:53 pm

Rerisen wrote:Wonder if Gar and Pax are fighting for the phone yet.

Jeffster81 · Post #1455 » by **Jeffster81** » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:53 pm

BR0D1E86 wrote:Does Parker make the team better? Yes.

If there's no long term solution to be had, why poop all over a short term solution while you keep looking?

It's debateable if Parker makes the Bulls better.

SuburbanOasis · Post #1456 » by **SuburbanOasis** » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:53 pm

Bulls_Fan wrote:They better not pull the, "We tried to make a deal, but they were asking for too much..we like our parts."

It may be true, but you have to give up something for someone.

Bulls need to address the SG position. Bulls have a chance to win the title this year. Why put that on hold by not acquiring a suitable SG?

Waiting for the summer (next year) is not a great idea.

Two firsts is "something".. especially since weaker drafts tend to leave you with solid players in the 20's.

Big Sexy · Post #1457 » by **Big Sexy** » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:53 pm

Morey is a genius. He knows what he's doing.

Post #1458 » by **Bulltalk** » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:53 pm

*crickets*

puma0821 · Post #1459 » by **puma0821** » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:53 pm

what happens 1st? 2pm or 100 pages?

blumeany · Post #1460 » by **blumeany** » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:53 pm

Jesus. If they want a big, give them Big Sexy and be done with it.