Jazz need to start Harris with either Miles or Hayward at the two guard and the other at small forward.
with Favors at power forward until Milsap can come back with Jefferson at center.
Bring in Watson with Bell at the two, Evans at small forward with Kirlinko at power forward until Milsap gets back and Cousins at center.
Let the rooks play and lets see what we got. we know Bell, and Kirlinko are old and Fess is worthless.
Harris Hayward Miles Favors Jefferson
Watson Bell Evans Kirlinko Cousins
Start some rookies!
Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS
Start some rookies!
-
- Junior
- Posts: 320
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jul 06, 2009
Re: Start some rookies!
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 829
- And1: 29
- Joined: Jan 28, 2010
Re: Start some rookies!
Sadly we are all in agreement but it doesn't look like Corbin is the least bit interested in rocking the boat. Has he changed anything since he took over?
Re: Start some rookies!
- Matt007b
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,791
- And1: 161
- Joined: Nov 10, 2008
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
-
Re: Start some rookies!
You know the one thing I've also noticed that Corbin *HAS* kind of done correctly lately..just like Sloan was before he left.
Since we have no SG (Bell/CJ sucks..) seemed like Corbin was using Watson running the point and along side Harris as a SG closing the game with the occasional zone...hopefully we'll start using that closing games, that's how we came back. The offense was flowing a ton better without Harris and chucker Bell out there.
Total agreement though:
Hayward>Bell/Miles
Since we have no SG (Bell/CJ sucks..) seemed like Corbin was using Watson running the point and along side Harris as a SG closing the game with the occasional zone...hopefully we'll start using that closing games, that's how we came back. The offense was flowing a ton better without Harris and chucker Bell out there.
Total agreement though:
Hayward>Bell/Miles
Re: Start some rookies!
- Neon Black
- Starter
- Posts: 2,294
- And1: 19
- Joined: Jun 25, 2007
- Location: Salt Lake City
Re: Start some rookies!
I agree, but couldn't this thought have gone in the thread right before it? There are too many threads going on that are all about the same topics.