ImageImage

ESPN Future Power Rankings - Bobcats last...again

Moderators: fatlever, JDR720, Diop, BigSlam, yosemiteben

User avatar
99problems
Junior
Posts: 275
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 08, 2008

ESPN Future Power Rankings - Bobcats last...again 

Post#1 » by 99problems » Wed Mar 16, 2011 6:01 pm

Insider http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/news/sto ... s-6-110316

While the Bobcats are in last place in our rankings once again, the glass-half-full view is that they're not quite as far down as they were the last time we did this exercise. Trading Gerald Wallace and Nazr Mohammed managed to clear up a very messy cap situation and brought in some youth.

On the court, the Bobcats have a bit more hope, too. Youngsters D.J. Augustin, Tyrus Thomas and Gerald Henderson look like at least long-term rotation players now, making the league's emptiest cupboard look slightly less barren. Additionally, Charlotte should benefit from high draft picks, and the first-rounder the Cats owe Chicago has sufficient lottery protection that it may not head Chicago's way for a while.

Nonetheless, the questions massively outweigh the answers. Michael Jordan may be an improvement over Robert Johnson as an owner, but the same two guys (Jordan and GM Rod Higgins) are making personnel calls and their track record has been spotty at best. In particular, the decisions to offload Tyson Chandler and Raymond Felton this past offseason seem misguided in the wake of breakout seasons by each; amazingly, the Chandler trade didn't even save the team money.

Charlotte could have cap room in two years, but which players want to go to that franchise, and can Jordan afford them anyway? Charlotte has little to differentiate it as a city, and it sports a low-profile, fairly miserable team on the court and an owner whose pockets appear relatively shallow. Put it all together and the next three years are likely to be extremely challenging for Mike's Cats.


And please, no "Hollinger sucks!" responses. This is Hollinger plus Chad Ford - and it's not exactly rocket science. Plus, they have the Bobcats in better place than the last two times they've done this - and Gerald Wallace was traded exactly because of how bleak things looked.
User avatar
doc.end
General Manager
Posts: 8,086
And1: 191
Joined: May 04, 2006
Location: Prague, CZE

Re: ESPN Future Power Rankings - Bobcats last...again 

Post#2 » by doc.end » Wed Mar 16, 2011 6:35 pm

Hollinger sucks!
Image
User avatar
Stun704
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,775
And1: 231
Joined: Feb 21, 2010
     

Re: ESPN Future Power Rankings - Bobcats last...again 

Post#3 » by Stun704 » Wed Mar 16, 2011 6:36 pm

Hollinger blows big hairy donkey balls!
Image
Pimpwerx wrote:I was a fan of the Lakers...Yankees... It took me almost a decade to become a fan of the Miami teams...I know it's frowned upon, but if you can look at it as an outsider, it's easier to understand why it happens. PEACE.
User avatar
Eoghan
RealGM
Posts: 11,315
And1: 3,293
Joined: May 20, 2009
         

Re: ESPN Future Power Rankings - Bobcats last...again 

Post#4 » by Eoghan » Wed Mar 16, 2011 6:48 pm

Hollinger really sucks?
captaincrunk
Banned User
Posts: 7,030
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 26, 2010
Location: Evansville, Indiana

Re: ESPN Future Power Rankings - Bobcats last...again 

Post#5 » by captaincrunk » Wed Mar 16, 2011 6:51 pm

BOOO BOBCATS
Jaruff
RealGM
Posts: 17,035
And1: 16
Joined: Apr 27, 2010

Re: ESPN Future Power Rankings - Bobcats last...again 

Post#6 » by Jaruff » Wed Mar 16, 2011 6:52 pm

99problems wrote:Insider http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/news/sto ... s-6-110316

While the Bobcats are in last place in our rankings once again, the glass-half-full view is that they're not quite as far down as they were the last time we did this exercise. Trading Gerald Wallace and Nazr Mohammed managed to clear up a very messy cap situation and brought in some youth.

On the court, the Bobcats have a bit more hope, too. Youngsters D.J. Augustin, Tyrus Thomas and Gerald Henderson look like at least long-term rotation players now, making the league's emptiest cupboard look slightly less barren. Additionally, Charlotte should benefit from high draft picks, and the first-rounder the Cats owe Chicago has sufficient lottery protection that it may not head Chicago's way for a while.

Nonetheless, the questions massively outweigh the answers. Michael Jordan may be an improvement over Robert Johnson as an owner, but the same two guys (Jordan and GM Rod Higgins) are making personnel calls and their track record has been spotty at best. In particular, the decisions to offload Tyson Chandler and Raymond Felton this past offseason seem misguided in the wake of breakout seasons by each; amazingly, the Chandler trade didn't even save the team money.

Charlotte could have cap room in two years, but which players want to go to that franchise, and can Jordan afford them anyway? Charlotte has little to differentiate it as a city, and it sports a low-profile, fairly miserable team on the court and an owner whose pockets appear relatively shallow. Put it all together and the next three years are likely to be extremely challenging for Mike's Cats.


And please, no "Hollinger sucks!" responses. This is Hollinger plus Chad Ford - and it's not exactly rocket science. Plus, they have the Bobcats in better place than the last two times they've done this - and Gerald Wallace was traded exactly because of how bleak things looked.


Statements like this always piss me off about these assessments. Would they agree that Felton was worth the money he wanted for us? Chandler played 50-ish games last year. He might be playing well for Dallas but would he give us anything Kwame doesn't? Same goes for Felton; if he stays, he's certainly not racking up the points like he had with the Knicks this year.

I'd argue that Detroit is in a worse situation than we are.
Kwame Brown Fan Club | Free Gilbert Arenas
User avatar
BigSlam
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 51,164
And1: 8,360
Joined: Jul 01, 2005

Re: ESPN Future Power Rankings - Bobcats last...again 

Post#7 » by BigSlam » Wed Mar 16, 2011 6:56 pm

Hollinger AND Ford suck?
B B M F 'ers
Jaruff
RealGM
Posts: 17,035
And1: 16
Joined: Apr 27, 2010

Re: ESPN Future Power Rankings - Bobcats last...again 

Post#8 » by Jaruff » Wed Mar 16, 2011 10:53 pm

BigSlam wrote:Hollinger AND Ford suck?


ESPN sucks.
Kwame Brown Fan Club | Free Gilbert Arenas
bobcats3wallace
Analyst
Posts: 3,237
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: ESPN Future Power Rankings - Bobcats last...again 

Post#9 » by bobcats3wallace » Wed Mar 16, 2011 11:44 pm

Jaruff wrote:
BigSlam wrote:Hollinger AND Ford suck?


ESPN sucks.


They suck because of how painfully obvious it ALWAYS becomes that they know very little about the Bobcats yet try to pretend they are experts. I'll be willing to bet niether of them know how Hendo has played as a starter. I would also bet niether of them have a clue who DJ Whie is. We'll see, but I think we will proove these bafoons wrong.
W_HAMILTON
RealGM
Posts: 17,453
And1: 16,996
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
 

Re: ESPN Future Power Rankings - Bobcats last...again 

Post#10 » by W_HAMILTON » Thu Mar 17, 2011 12:23 am

Nice that we sacrificed the present just to retain the title of the team with the bleakest future.
Howard Mass wrote:You do not have the right to not be offended. Just because something is offensive to you does not mean that it breaks the board rules.
User avatar
countryboi
Head Coach
Posts: 7,312
And1: 1,459
Joined: Jul 30, 2008
   

Re: ESPN Future Power Rankings - Bobcats last...again 

Post#11 » by countryboi » Thu Mar 17, 2011 12:49 am

how are the bobcats future worse than the raptors and the cavs......Hollinger you suck
The Cut Podcast, An Hilarious barbershop style discussion podcast. Watch us on Youtube and listen to us on all major Podcast Platforms. https://linktr.ee/thecut_podcast
captaincrunk
Banned User
Posts: 7,030
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 26, 2010
Location: Evansville, Indiana

Re: ESPN Future Power Rankings - Bobcats last...again 

Post#12 » by captaincrunk » Thu Mar 17, 2011 1:19 am

countryboi wrote:how are the bobcats future worse than the raptors and the cavs......Hollinger you suck

Well the cavs have like 4 lottery picks over the next two years.
User avatar
countryboi
Head Coach
Posts: 7,312
And1: 1,459
Joined: Jul 30, 2008
   

Re: ESPN Future Power Rankings - Bobcats last...again 

Post#13 » by countryboi » Thu Mar 17, 2011 1:55 am

3 lottery picks and a late first?
The Cut Podcast, An Hilarious barbershop style discussion podcast. Watch us on Youtube and listen to us on all major Podcast Platforms. https://linktr.ee/thecut_podcast
captaincrunk
Banned User
Posts: 7,030
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 26, 2010
Location: Evansville, Indiana

Re: ESPN Future Power Rankings - Bobcats last...again 

Post#14 » by captaincrunk » Thu Mar 17, 2011 1:59 am

countryboi wrote:3 lottery picks and a late first?

Something to that effect. But 3 lottery picks - two likely to be quite high - helps loads.
W_HAMILTON
RealGM
Posts: 17,453
And1: 16,996
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
 

Re: ESPN Future Power Rankings - Bobcats last...again 

Post#15 » by W_HAMILTON » Thu Mar 17, 2011 2:48 am

What did he mean when he said the Chandler trade didn't save us money?
Howard Mass wrote:You do not have the right to not be offended. Just because something is offensive to you does not mean that it breaks the board rules.
captaincrunk
Banned User
Posts: 7,030
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 26, 2010
Location: Evansville, Indiana

Re: ESPN Future Power Rankings - Bobcats last...again 

Post#16 » by captaincrunk » Thu Mar 17, 2011 2:51 am

W_HAMILTON wrote:What did he mean when he said the Chandler trade didn't save us money?

Well Chandler is an expiring, while Carroll and Najera aren't (Dampier was though).
User avatar
dmutombo321
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,859
And1: 418
Joined: Feb 25, 2004
Location: Charlotte

Re: ESPN Future Power Rankings - Bobcats last...again 

Post#17 » by dmutombo321 » Thu Mar 17, 2011 3:19 am

captaincrunk wrote:
W_HAMILTON wrote:What did he mean when he said the Chandler trade didn't save us money?

Well Chandler is an expiring, while Carroll and Najera aren't (Dampier was though).


That's what made the move so bone headed; Jordan saved a few mil this season only in exchange for taking on even more $ long term by assuming the multi year balances remaining on Carroll and Naraja's contracts. Ultimately, the deal amounts to a net loss financially.
captaincrunk
Banned User
Posts: 7,030
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 26, 2010
Location: Evansville, Indiana

Re: ESPN Future Power Rankings - Bobcats last...again 

Post#18 » by captaincrunk » Thu Mar 17, 2011 3:30 am

dmutombo321 wrote:
captaincrunk wrote:
W_HAMILTON wrote:What did he mean when he said the Chandler trade didn't save us money?

Well Chandler is an expiring, while Carroll and Najera aren't (Dampier was though).


That's what made the move so bone headed; Jordan saved a few mil this season only in exchange for taking on even more $ long term by assuming the multi year balances remaining on Carroll and Naraja's contracts. Ultimately, the deal amounts to a net loss financially.

Yeah. Though to be fair I think the Bobcats thought they were getting more talent in return, assuming Dampier would play at a cheaper contract and at a similar level to Tyson, then adding in two half decent role players. Honestly I really don't understand that move at all.
User avatar
Stun704
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,775
And1: 231
Joined: Feb 21, 2010
     

Re: ESPN Future Power Rankings - Bobcats last...again 

Post#19 » by Stun704 » Thu Mar 17, 2011 3:50 am

Dampier trade was made for CP3.. but i'm assuming shinn renigged on the deal when he had probably verbally agreed to taking dampier and filler for CP3
Image
Pimpwerx wrote:I was a fan of the Lakers...Yankees... It took me almost a decade to become a fan of the Miami teams...I know it's frowned upon, but if you can look at it as an outsider, it's easier to understand why it happens. PEACE.
therebirth
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,491
And1: 61
Joined: May 21, 2004

Re: ESPN Future Power Rankings - Bobcats last...again 

Post#20 » by therebirth » Thu Mar 17, 2011 4:18 am

The cats are going to lose 20 million this season. Now add what would have been Tyson and Felton's contract plus the luxury tax for a team that everybody said peak last year at 7 th seed. What kind of sence does that make. None. And it is no secret those two hate the cats. Didn't Ford report that no one wanted Wallace for a pick?
The curse of Higgins!

Return to Charlotte Hornets