Post#7 » by Luigi » Mon Mar 14, 2011 9:35 pm
First, Deron can play defense when he's motivated. Give him a matchup that people will be watching, or put him on national TV in a close game, and he'll play like he should. In college, he was known for good defense.
Williams can handle fast point guards, as long as they don't have much size. Chris Paul is much faster, but Williams uses his length and bulk to cause him problems. You'd think he could do the same to Nash, but Nash's unlimited offensive tools cause him problems. Fast guards who are big enough (Rose, Westbrooke) have been causing him trouble lately.
I don't think I ever noticed a problem with him running under screens. He'd get around them and chase down his man more often than not.
Overall, I think he's more committed to breaking down his man on offense so they are worn out on the other side. His cross and pick play is strong enough that his defender must spend a lot of energy to keep out of the paint, when is when he starts hitting important threes on you. A lot of his defenders can't go at him 100% on the other end when Williams is defending them.
As for his reputation for defending shooting guards, I think that comes from a small sample size of him in nationally televised games. He has a chip on his shoulder and the right tools to defend a scoring 2 for a few plays, but I don't think he could keep it up for more than a few games. Oh, and he chip-on-shoulder thing may be the biggest factor in his success guarding Paul.
I don't think he's going to make an all-defensive team in the NBA, but he's at least going to play average defense for you and then beat his man on the other side for the net gain.
In '03-'04, Jerry Sloan coached the ESPN predicted "worst team of all time" to 42-40.