
OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
- Gek
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,024
- And1: 1,807
- Joined: Aug 12, 2004
- Contact:
-
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,273
- And1: 162
- Joined: Dec 23, 2010
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
So I guess your bracket is totally done seeing as you had Pitt winning it all. Lmao well friend that seat on the Duke bandwagon is still open if you want to take a seat. You should be rooting for us to hand Butler a proper ass whooping again.
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
- Doormatt
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,438
- And1: 2,013
- Joined: Mar 07, 2011
-
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
Duke is losing to Arizona, book it. Derrick Williams is a BEAST. I got em in the final losing to KU.
#doorgek
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
-
- Forum Mod - Lakers
- Posts: 38,252
- And1: 9,956
- Joined: Apr 17, 2005
- Location: Pitcher's Mound
-
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
Arizona will lose their next game.
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
- Gek
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,024
- And1: 1,807
- Joined: Aug 12, 2004
- Contact:
-
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
I'd rather masturbate with a Magic Bullet than root for Duke. Book it.
#teamhermes
go pens - pirates - steelers - lakers
go pens - pirates - steelers - lakers
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,273
- And1: 162
- Joined: Dec 23, 2010
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
Doormatt wrote:Duke is losing to Arizona, book it. Derrick Williams is a BEAST. I got em in the final losing to KU.
LOL please. Williams is a great player but he's really all they have. Arizona will suffer the same way as another 1-man in BYU will, and that's in upset. As Tycobb said, I'm doubting your chances of getting past Texas let alone playing us.
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
- Gek
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,024
- And1: 1,807
- Joined: Aug 12, 2004
- Contact:
-
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
Duke won't win it all.
I feel bad for Nasir Robinson on Pitt, but at the same time, Pitt never should have been tied with Butler. We should have had at least a five point buffer.
I feel bad for Nasir Robinson on Pitt, but at the same time, Pitt never should have been tied with Butler. We should have had at least a five point buffer.
#teamhermes
go pens - pirates - steelers - lakers
go pens - pirates - steelers - lakers
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,273
- And1: 162
- Joined: Dec 23, 2010
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
G=K wrote:Duke won't win it all.
I feel bad for Nasir Robinson on Pitt, but at the same time, Pitt never should have been tied with Butler. We should have had at least a five point buffer.
Who has us winning it all? I certaintly don't. But with the addition of Irving I don't think there's a team short of Ohio State or Kansas that can beat us. I have Kansas winning it all btw. Well the game could've gone either way. Two idiot plays were made, but it just so happens your idiot was the nail in the coffin.
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
- dub81
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,715
- And1: 182
- Joined: Mar 20, 2008
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
Pitt and Duke was my two choices.
I really have not clue right now.
I really have not clue right now.

Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
- Gek
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,024
- And1: 1,807
- Joined: Aug 12, 2004
- Contact:
-
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
Jetset wrote:G=K wrote:Duke won't win it all.
I feel bad for Nasir Robinson on Pitt, but at the same time, Pitt never should have been tied with Butler. We should have had at least a five point buffer.
Who has us winning it all? I certaintly don't. But with the addition of Irving I don't think there's a team short of Ohio State or Kansas that can beat us. I have Kansas winning it all btw. Well the game could've gone either way. Two idiot plays were made, but it just so happens your idiot was the nail in the coffin.
From what I saw today Duke almost lost to a mediocre team from a mediocre Big Ten... have fun when Derrick Williams manhandles your defense next game.
#teamhermes
go pens - pirates - steelers - lakers
go pens - pirates - steelers - lakers
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,273
- And1: 162
- Joined: Dec 23, 2010
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
Texas gave Arizona that game with that stupid 5 sec. violation. Also, I'm not worried about Williams going off on us, Texas has shown that if you have enough big bodies you can throw him off his game. Kelly, Plumlee Brothers, Singler. I think we'll be fine. I wonder if Arizona will have fun when Nolan, Singler, Curry, and Irving take over get all their bigs in foul trouble and keeps Derrick's ass on the bench.
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,273
- And1: 162
- Joined: Dec 23, 2010
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
And you're underrating Michigan. They're a respectable team with a fantastic guard in Darius Morris. I bet you Pitt would have a tough time against them as well.
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
- DEEP3CL
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,899
- And1: 3,207
- Joined: Jul 23, 2005
- Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
-
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
Texas was robbed today, bad calls all across the board in that game.
VETERAN LAKERS FAN
SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
- Gek
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,024
- And1: 1,807
- Joined: Aug 12, 2004
- Contact:
-
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
How do those two fouls get called at the end of the Pitt-Butler game, but nothing gets called at the end of the Texas game?
#teamhermes
go pens - pirates - steelers - lakers
go pens - pirates - steelers - lakers
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,057
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jan 18, 2011
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
Duke won a close game . Just surivive.
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,273
- And1: 162
- Joined: Dec 23, 2010
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
G=K wrote:How do those two fouls get called at the end of the Pitt-Butler game, but nothing gets called at the end of the Texas game?
I believe that the refs go out and officiate games with agendas in mind. UNC and Arizona will make more money for the tourney than Texas or Washington, so all the questionable calls that were made were in favor of UNC and Arizona. There is no reason that Arizona or UNC for that matter should still be in it. The Washington coach was asked after the game did his try and get the refs to watch the replay, he said he did and that the ref said quickly "they already saw it" and him and his cronies walked off the court in a quick fashion. It's just frustrating that crooked officiating happens each and every season and it costs the small schools an opportunity to gain notoriety. Arizona will get theirs Thursday and UNC will get theirs soon enough.
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
- Gek
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,024
- And1: 1,807
- Joined: Aug 12, 2004
- Contact:
-
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
But Texas and Washington and Pitt aren't small schools...
#teamhermes
go pens - pirates - steelers - lakers
go pens - pirates - steelers - lakers
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,273
- And1: 162
- Joined: Dec 23, 2010
Re: OT: NCAA Tournament Discussion
Sorry about the confusion, I'm not calling Texas, Washington, or Pitt small schools. I'm just talking about the overall officiating that goes on during the tournament whenever a lesser known school tries their go at a big program. Some of the small schools can ball just as good as some of the "big boys". And there was no screwing in the Pitt game, your guy just flat out made a stupid decision.