CunningLinguist wrote:dagger wrote:I would simply remind people of the obvious - we don't have to fill all of this team's weaknesses in this draft. In fact, it would be impossible to do that. It's a multi-stage process, so if we don't like these point guards, we can go somewhere else with our pick. BPA is still a very good approach. The deeper you are in assets, the more you can trade to fill needs with quality options, like NJ did with Deron Williams. We can probably get back to "respectability", like 7th or 8th place, in one year, but it will take more years to lay the foundation for a potential contender.
I agree with the BPA approach as well, I just feel that the way this draft may shake out, the BPA at the 5th or 6th pick may indeed be a point guard, which makes things a lot easier.
Yep, this is my exactly feeling too... Anyway, the more, the merrier as far as good prospects are concerned. If we do our homework, we'll add a good player, period.






















