Kirsten19 wrote:No Tyler Zeller in the 2nd round?
28. Boston - Tyler Zeller (6'11'', C, North Carolina, Jr.)
Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus
Kirsten19 wrote:No Tyler Zeller in the 2nd round?
Casperkid23 wrote:Lack of perspective on draft prospects showing through on your latest mock. But hey, at least you're getting a ton of views and replies because you update it incessantly.

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
HomoSapien wrote:Warspite, the greatest poster in the history of realgm.
WillyJakkz wrote:Cammo,
Who do you think drafts my guy JaJuan Johnson and why do you think Nolan Smith goes in the 2nd RD?
You already know how I feel about Johnson and personally I think Smith could be the 4th best PG option in the draft (behind Irving, Walker, Fredette, and maybe Knight).
Cammo101 wrote:WillyJakkz wrote:Cammo,
Who do you think drafts my guy JaJuan Johnson and why do you think Nolan Smith goes in the 2nd RD?
You already know how I feel about Johnson and personally I think Smith could be the 4th best PG option in the draft (behind Irving, Walker, Fredette, and maybe Knight).
Pretty much any team in the late first to mid second round has a chance at grabbing Johnson. Everyone needs athletic bigs and at that point in the draft, people are looking for guys who can make their team and are not too worried about fit or need.
Nolan Smith may end up in the first round once all the returning players are out of the mocks. It is highly debatable whether Nolan Smith can be a true point guard at the NBA level. We know he can score, but he is a bit of a prospect without a position. He certainly lacks the upside and true position of the 4 guys you listed. Nolan Smith is a good player and I actually had him mocked to Atlanta for a long time in the first round. But, they traded their pick. Not many teams in the mid to late 1st round need point guards. If 2 of the 4 guys you listed manage to go back to school, then Nolan could really shoot up boards because of a big time lack of lead guards.
It seems you are in love with 4 year college players who are proven at the college level. Most NBA GMs are much less enamoured with the Johnson's and Smith's of the world and much more enamoured with the Jones's and Barnes's of the world.

Cammo101 wrote:For the most part though, the draft is about finding stars, not finding nice role players. Every offseason, quality role players are available through free agency. The same can not be said for star players. If you do not draft a guy like LeBron or Dwight, it is almost impossible to get them. If you do not draft a guy like Shane Battier, you will have multiple chance to get him if you want him and there will no doubt be other similar players like him available.
This is why (rightly) GMs are trying to catch lightning in a bottle. Because lightning is what wins in the NBA. The first round is about finding future stars, the second round and free agency are about finding role players.
WillyJakkz wrote:Cammo101 wrote:For the most part though, the draft is about finding stars, not finding nice role players. Every offseason, quality role players are available through free agency. The same can not be said for star players. If you do not draft a guy like LeBron or Dwight, it is almost impossible to get them. If you do not draft a guy like Shane Battier, you will have multiple chance to get him if you want him and there will no doubt be other similar players like him available.
This is why (rightly) GMs are trying to catch lightning in a bottle. Because lightning is what wins in the NBA. The first round is about finding future stars, the second round and free agency are about finding role players.
Let's be real, these teams that are "lotto bound" more than likely have been in that same draft position year after year and if they haven't drafted or found their "LeBron, Durant, or Dwight" then maybe it's time to draft guys who actually can play instead of looking to cultivate these underclassmen into "stars".
Jazzfan12 wrote:WillyJakkz wrote:Cammo101 wrote:For the most part though, the draft is about finding stars, not finding nice role players. Every offseason, quality role players are available through free agency. The same can not be said for star players. If you do not draft a guy like LeBron or Dwight, it is almost impossible to get them. If you do not draft a guy like Shane Battier, you will have multiple chance to get him if you want him and there will no doubt be other similar players like him available.
This is why (rightly) GMs are trying to catch lightning in a bottle. Because lightning is what wins in the NBA. The first round is about finding future stars, the second round and free agency are about finding role players.
Let's be real, these teams that are "lotto bound" more than likely have been in that same draft position year after year and if they haven't drafted or found their "LeBron, Durant, or Dwight" then maybe it's time to draft guys who actually can play instead of looking to cultivate these underclassmen into "stars".
None of the teams drafting in the lottery have really picked a super high upside guy in a while.