Sidenote: And if ever we'll have the best record, do you think it will give Kobe a chance to win the MVP?

http://www.nba.com/standings/team_recor ... d_Cnf.html
Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb
KB24TBOTB wrote:I would say it is a very slim chance. Spurs would have to lose like 3 more in a row and we would have to win the head to head matchup against them in staples to have a decent shot at it. I don't think spurs will just roll over because of the lose of Duncan as most of their success revolves around TP and Manu. As for catching the bulls for the 2nd best record in the league is very possible but the best record seems sealed and put away by the spurs as of now.
Slava wrote:I pulled a hammy while fapping. I won't make fun of Nash.
SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
DEEP3CL wrote:Do you guys realize how many teams with the overall best record has won the title in the last 5 years ?
05-06 Detroit had the best record, Miami won the title.
06-07 Dallas had the best record, Spurs won the title.
07-08 Celtics had the best record, Celtics won the title.
08-09 Cavs had the best record, Lakers won the title.
09-10 Cavs had the best record, Lakers won the title.
So only once in the last 5 seasons has the team with the best overall record has won the title. Not saying it isn't worth anything but it seems teams rely too much on letting the record boast their strength.
Now on the flip side of that the Lakers have had the best overall record in the conference the last 3 seasons in a row, so in a way it's vital in our success in how we've done in the playoffs in our own conference. But to me, I don't think we need it as bad as some may make it seem. You have to understand the Spurs chase for the HCA in the league and conference was a mental mind ploy by Popvich. When he came out early in the year and said having HCA is crucial to the Spurs, I knew right then he questioned his teams ability to beat the Lakers without it.
The only reason they got out to the lead they did is for one we had that bad stretch back in December, secondly they avoided injury up until now. But I'm not worried about them, we can beat them on their floor when it counts..........we only need one win to swing it our way.
DEEP3CL wrote:Do you guys realize how many teams with the overall best record has won the title in the last 5 years ?
05-06 Detroit had the best record, Miami won the title.
06-07 Dallas had the best record, Spurs won the title.
07-08 Celtics had the best record, Celtics won the title.
08-09 Cavs had the best record, Lakers won the title.
09-10 Cavs had the best record, Lakers won the title.
So only once in the last 5 seasons has the team with the best overall record has won the title. Not saying it isn't worth anything but it seems teams rely too much on letting the record boast their strength.
Now on the flip side of that the Lakers have had the best overall record in the conference the last 3 seasons in a row, so in a way it's vital in our success in how we've done in the playoffs in our own conference. But to me, I don't think we need it as bad as some may make it seem. You have to understand the Spurs chase for the HCA in the league and conference was a mental mind ploy by Popvich. When he came out early in the year and said having HCA is crucial to the Spurs, I knew right then he questioned his teams ability to beat the Lakers without it.
The only reason they got out to the lead they did is for one we had that bad stretch back in December, secondly they avoided injury up until now. But I'm not worried about them, we can beat them on their floor when it counts..........we only need one win to swing it our way.
andrewww wrote:DEEP3CL wrote:Do you guys realize how many teams with the overall best record has won the title in the last 5 years ?
05-06 Detroit had the best record, Miami won the title.
06-07 Dallas had the best record, Spurs won the title.
07-08 Celtics had the best record, Celtics won the title.
08-09 Cavs had the best record, Lakers won the title.
09-10 Cavs had the best record, Lakers won the title.
So only once in the last 5 seasons has the team with the best overall record has won the title. Not saying it isn't worth anything but it seems teams rely too much on letting the record boast their strength.
Now on the flip side of that the Lakers have had the best overall record in the conference the last 3 seasons in a row, so in a way it's vital in our success in how we've done in the playoffs in our own conference. But to me, I don't think we need it as bad as some may make it seem. You have to understand the Spurs chase for the HCA in the league and conference was a mental mind ploy by Popvich. When he came out early in the year and said having HCA is crucial to the Spurs, I knew right then he questioned his teams ability to beat the Lakers without it.
The only reason they got out to the lead they did is for one we had that bad stretch back in December, secondly they avoided injury up until now. But I'm not worried about them, we can beat them on their floor when it counts..........we only need one win to swing it our way.
totally agree with your assessment on popovich. the spurs usually never "care" about the regular season, but this season they placed a priority on HCA. he knows theyre going to need homecourt to give them a chance against us, one of the few teams that can exploit their lack of bigs.
dcash4 wrote:to be honest i'd rather have the 2 seed and matchup with the mavs than have the 1 seed and matchup with the thunder.