Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
TrueWarrior wrote:atribecalledrch wrote:Hey remember the Amber Rose thread when guys were like how they wouldn't fck with a short haired girl? Well I fckd a bald chick recently and it was awesome. Was rubbing on that head while I was hittin the skins. Moral of the story: pussy is pussy.
No, you didnt.
Shemy wrote:I need some new pornstars to look @
name as many as you can
go.....
knicks742 wrote:Any system that wants more of my money is a bad system.
atribecalledrch wrote:JordanXI wrote:
Absolutely, I'll do my best.
Socialism is public ownership of the means of production and production based on human need as opposed to private profit. However, when a person calls himself a socialist over communist, he is usually a socialist in a less authoritarian fashion--not necessarily believing in violent overthrow of the state. But rather the overcoming of capitalism through established democratic means.
So socialism is really the idea of ruling by the working class. Socialists will try and accomplish this through normal means, like a legislator, or the legislature, ect… and run the government in a normal fashion, but with the benefit of "the people" in mind. However, socialism can also refer to any alternative to capitalism.
Communism says socialism is the transitional phase between communism and capitalism. Socialism is a period of state ownership of the means of production. Pure communism is the point where the state has developed the means of production and taught the working class how to operate as a unified force to the point where the state no longer needs to exist and withers away. So that workers' communes are what effectively run the society.
Nationalism is a strong allegiance to one's nation. When people put their nation above their politics, class, ect...
Sounds to me that neither is necessarily negative. I always knew people were idiots and tried to put these two systems in a bad light. Why don't we move towards being a socialist country then? Also I wanted to know: Is this really a democracy? The people seem to have absolutely little say in any of the countries decisions. I spoke to my dad about this and he said that there was a situation where when Hilary CLinton was elected NY's Senator, and while they were voting whether to go to war she received many calls from people urging her to vote against the US going into Iraq and she instead voted for it. Shouldn't it be like when their is always huge decision to make we the people vote for it and the true majority wins? Rather than what the person who represents us thinks?
swb wrote:when do Knicks Playoff tickets officially go on sale?
Rasho Brezec wrote:knicks742 wrote:Any system that wants more of my money is a bad system.
ComboGuardCity wrote:This thread has become too safe for work
Grad School? Different Types of Governments? Come on guys!
Knicked_Up wrote:if they lose to the Nets without Dwill and Humphries than yeah this curse is real.
Knicked_Up wrote:if they lose to the Nets without Dwill and Humphries than yeah this curse is real.
cshoops wrote:Last night he said he's preparing for the playoff version.
