ImageImage

Rockets and McHale agree to a 3year deal, 4th year TO

Moderators: ken6199, TMU

Down to Casey, Frank & McHale. Who ya got?

Dwane Casey
7
24%
Lawrence Frank
7
24%
Kevin McHale
15
52%
 
Total votes: 29

x-
Analyst
Posts: 3,511
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 06, 2005

Rockets and McHale agree to a 3year deal, 4th year TO 

Post#1 » by x- » Thu Apr 14, 2011 4:46 pm

Rockets hire McHale, look for lead asistant
June 30, 2011: Shawn Respert No Longer With Rockets
June 24, 2011: D-League coach Finch added to Rockets' coaching staff
June 12, 2011: McHale likely to follow assistant coach model
June 7, 2011: Video: Kevin McHale's First Day On The Job
June 6, 2011: Justice: McHale can help himself by talking to owner
June 6, 2011: Rockets Interview Chuck Person
June 4, 2011: Solomon: With McHale hire, Alexander's vibe unlike past
June 3, 2011: Hunt, Joerger Arrive For Rockets Interviews
June 3, 2011: Video: Kevin McHale Introductory Press Conference
June 3, 2011: McHale introduced, beginning 'a new era for the Rockets'
June 2, 2011: Justice: Rockets praise McHale’s leadership
June 1, 2011: Rockets to Meet With Nuggets' Hunt
June 1, 2011: Video: Kevin McHale Interview on NBA TV
June 1, 2011: McHale says he missed being in the fight
June 1, 2011: Justice: I wouldn’t be surprised if McHale became a really good head coach
June 1, 2011: Press Release: Kevin McHale Named Rockets Head Coach
May 31, 2011: McHale leaving TV set for Rockets sideline
May 31, 2011: Feigen: Rockets still officially mum on hiring, but McHale press conference likely Friday
May 29, 2011: Grizzlies assistant Joerger will meet with Rockets
May 28, 2011: Rockets' McHale lauded for his work with young players
May 27, 2011: Feigen: How the Rockets chose Kevin McHale. Can he exceed expectations again?
May 27, 2011: Justice: McHale brings leadership, and that’s way more important than what he doesn’t bring
May 27, 2011: Rockets hiring McHale as coach
May 27, 2011: McHale agrees to four-year deal to coach Rockets
May 25, 2011: Solomon: McHale may be good fit for Rockets

Coaching search related articles:
May 25, 2011: Rockets wind down coaching search
May 24, 2011: Sources: McHale to meet with Rockets owner
May 21, 2011: Feigen: Still a three-man race, it won’t be long until Rockets are ready to make a coaching choice
May 21, 2011: Justice: If Daryl Morey and Leslie Alexander say Kevin McHale is the right guy ...
May 21, 2011: McHale leader for Rockets job
May 17, 2011: Source: Rockets focusing on three coaching finalists
May 17, 2011: Rockets Meeting With Finalists Twice
May 08, 2011: Feigen: As playoffs continue to astound without them, Rockets close in on their coaching choice
May 09, 2011: Justice: McHale would be intriguing gamble for Rockets
May 07, 2011: Justice: Who should the Rockets hire? Casey? Frank? McHale?
May 02, 2011: Adelman, Rockets disagreed over coaching successor
April 27, 2011: Feigen: Reading between lines on the Rockets’ long list of coaching candidates
April 20, 2011: Casting call for next Rockets coach will be wide, deep


Adelman and Rockets agree to part ways:

April 19, 2011: Rick Adelman will not return as Rockets coach.

Leading up to Adelman's departure:

April 12, 2011: Justice: Rockets owner willing to roll the dice on coach
April 13, 2011: Season ends with a laugher, but what lies ahead may not bring grins
April 13, 2011: With Rockets season over, what's next. We'll start with Morey/Adelman get together. (I'll bring the wine.)

Coaches the Rockets considered:

Assistants:

Mike Budenholzer (SAS) - Wants to stay in San Antonio
Brian Shaw (LAL) - Interview granted
Jack Sikma (HOU) - Interviewed on 04/27
Michael Malone (NO) - Not a candidate
Kelvin Sampson (MIL) - Interviewed on 04/26
Mario Elie (SAC) - Interviewed on 04/27
Sam Cassell (WAS) - Interviewed on 05/03
Assistants with head coaching experience:
Dwane Casey (DAL) - Interviewed on 05/05, Interviewed a second time
Lawrence Frank (BOS) - Interviewed on 05/02, Interviewed a second time
Former head coaches:
Kevin McHale (MIN) - Interviewed on 05/10, Interviewed a second time
Mike Brown (CLE) - Has withdrawn himself from consideration
Mike Woodson (ATL) - Interviewed on 04/28
John Lucas (CLE) - Interviewed on 05/04
Head coaches:

Stan Van Gundy (ORL) - Won't get fired according to Magic CEO
Frank Vogel (IND) - Interviewed on 05/05
User avatar
MaxRider
RealGM
Posts: 44,473
And1: 5,805
Joined: Jun 08, 2005
Location: Choke City
 

Re: The Adelman dilemma 

Post#2 » by MaxRider » Thu Apr 14, 2011 6:22 pm

No
I was against signing him in the first place
he's a good coach no offense
but not a good one to develop young players
don't give me Landry and Budinger
he had to play them because of injured
he had Gerald Wallace for 4 years and he didn't make it to his rotation

Thibodeau may not be what he is now if he wasn't assistant for the Boston team
but now i don't know any good candidate (i don't follow other team too close to know their assistant)
User avatar
Aaron Brooks
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,148
And1: 629
Joined: Jan 14, 2008

Re: The Adelman dilemma 

Post#3 » by Aaron Brooks » Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:11 pm

Keep.

He does develop players. Unless you're a top 5 pick on a terrible team, you need to earn your playing time. Scola, Landry, Patterson, Brooks and whoever else all rode the pine for a couple months to soak everything in before being thrown onto the court. Of course they also had to go hard in practice too.

Who did we fail to develop exactly? Dorsey? Taylor? they don't seem to be doing anything on their current teams either. Jury is still out on Terrence and Thabeet.

Only coach I can think of that develops players is Pop, but his rookies have the benefit of playing with 3 all-stars that can cover up for their mistakes, whereas we don't have that benefit. A couple of bad possessions and thats the game for us.
baki wrote:Harden is essentially a very good role player, he's not a franchise player.
User avatar
Aaron Brooks
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,148
And1: 629
Joined: Jan 14, 2008

Re: The Adelman dilemma 

Post#4 » by Aaron Brooks » Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:13 pm

Jonathan_Feigen wrote:Courtney Lee said players are one by one asking Rockets management in exit interviews to keep Rick Adelman. #hounews


:wordyo:
baki wrote:Harden is essentially a very good role player, he's not a franchise player.
User avatar
MaxRider
RealGM
Posts: 44,473
And1: 5,805
Joined: Jun 08, 2005
Location: Choke City
 

Re: The Adelman dilemma 

Post#5 » by MaxRider » Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:24 pm

how do you know if player is good enough play or not if you don't play them?
if iverson is playing for adelman he will never get to play
the guy don't practice
team aint going anywhere and yet he go out and play only 7-men
good thing is ... he got the win ... making him #7 all time winning coach

i still think morey traded away alston to force adelman to play brooks
rocketsballin
RealGM
Posts: 12,748
And1: 355
Joined: Mar 07, 2009

Re: The Adelman dilemma 

Post#6 » by rocketsballin » Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:47 pm

i defeinitely want him to stay, for at least 2 years. see what moves we make. if in the 2012 offseason we make a move that puts us in the playoffs (not the cheap brad miller or ariza deals) then rick's system will be really helpful. within 3 years we could make a big push for a superstar and then have a contending team.

but rick is old and his coaching career is nearing an end, so he definitely doesnt wanna wait too long to get in the playoffs, which is why morey should make some moves this offseason. im too lazy to type everything i wanna say lol

i dont mind a new coach, especially if we're not makin the playoffs next year.
User avatar
MaxRider
RealGM
Posts: 44,473
And1: 5,805
Joined: Jun 08, 2005
Location: Choke City
 

Re: The Adelman dilemma 

Post#7 » by MaxRider » Thu Apr 14, 2011 9:55 pm

roxfashoballin wrote:i defeinitely want him to stay, for at least 2 years. see what moves we make. if in the 2012 offseason we make a move that puts us in the playoffs (not the cheap brad miller or ariza deals) then rick's system will be really helpful. within 3 years we could make a big push for a superstar and then have a contending team.

but rick is old and his coaching career is nearing an end, so he definitely doesnt wanna wait too long to get in the playoffs, which is why morey should make some moves this offseason. im too lazy to type everything i wanna say lol

i dont mind a new coach, especially if we're not makin the playoffs next year.

don't mind new coach
problem is ... no good candidate
unless you guys want jerry sloan
User avatar
Baller 24
RealGM
Posts: 16,637
And1: 19
Joined: Feb 11, 2006

Re: The Adelman dilemma 

Post#8 » by Baller 24 » Thu Apr 14, 2011 10:33 pm

If the job is to create a contender this off season, then sure why not keep? if not, then really no need to waste each others times.
dockingsched wrote: the biggest loss of the off-season for the lakers was earl clark
User avatar
Aaron Brooks
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,148
And1: 629
Joined: Jan 14, 2008

Re: The Adelman dilemma 

Post#9 » by Aaron Brooks » Thu Apr 14, 2011 10:58 pm

MaxRider wrote:how do you know if player is good enough play or not if you don't play them?
if iverson is playing for adelman he will never get to play
the guy don't practice
team aint going anywhere and yet he go out and play only 7-men
good thing is ... he got the win ... making him #7 all time winning coach

i still think morey traded away alston to force adelman to play brooks


They see enough in practice, you go hard in practice to earn a rotation spot. You then go hard during the games to keep your spot, simple logic.
How was this team not going anywhere? up until last week we were still competing for a playoff spot. So unless we're a contender we should just tank every season? It's thinking like that that leads to a losing culture.
Hes on the last year of his contract, is he suppose to "develop" players for a team that he might not even coach next year? Heck, he might not even coach next year, so of course hes gonna go as far as he can with the team that he has.
baki wrote:Harden is essentially a very good role player, he's not a franchise player.
Guy986
RealGM
Posts: 17,759
And1: 647
Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Location: BBG Nation unite!

Re: The Adelman dilemma 

Post#10 » by Guy986 » Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:44 am

Adelman is a great coach. I hope we keep him. There isn't anybody better that is available.
User avatar
zapatasblood
General Manager
Posts: 7,629
And1: 580
Joined: Jul 03, 2010
Location: Stank-O-Dena
     

Re: The Adelman dilemma 

Post#11 » by zapatasblood » Fri Apr 15, 2011 1:27 am

I vote to not extend him. He is a good coach and can do a lot of things like get a average team to play good and get you the playoffs but he can win a ring. 20 some odd years tell me so and he has had some very good teams. I think there are a few coaches out there some whom we may not know about but you have to give someone a chance. I am hoping for the Shaw or whatever his name is in L.A.
Light beer is for pregnant woman and children
"How sweet it is!" -Gene Peterson
And you never once paid for drugs Not once
x-
Analyst
Posts: 3,511
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 06, 2005

Re: The Adelman dilemma 

Post#12 » by x- » Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:12 am

Aaron Brooks wrote:
Jonathan_Feigen wrote:Courtney Lee said players are one by one asking Rockets management in exit interviews to keep Rick Adelman. #hounews

:wordyo:

Naw can't say I was homie “@BHiGkNaStEe: @TheRealTWill were you in there asking the Front Office to keep Coach Rick Adelman?”

http://twitter.com/#!/TheRealTWill/stat ... 3758046208 :lol:

Also, Video: Rockets Players Hope Adelman Comes Back Next Season
User avatar
PocketRockets
Pro Prospect
Posts: 914
And1: 9
Joined: Mar 14, 2008

Re: The Adelman dilemma 

Post#13 » by PocketRockets » Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:31 am

zapatasblood wrote:I vote to not extend him. He is a good coach and can do a lot of things like get a average team to play good and get you the playoffs but he can win a ring. 20 some odd years tell me so and he has had some very good teams. I think there are a few coaches out there some whom we may not know about but you have to give someone a chance. I am hoping for the Shaw or whatever his name is in L.A.


1) We're not going to win a ring anytime in the next 3-4 years. With Miami, Chi, OKC, there's no way we can develop faster than them. I say stay competitive, make the playoffs, make the 2nd or 3rd round and I'll consider it a success.

2) Go with someone that CAN coach vs someone that might be able to coach? I don't need a hall of fame coach, but I'd like a coach with some coaching experience. From that first article, it sounds like that's not even a requisite for Morey?

Get an average team to play good. You make it sound so easy. I'm not trying to nitpick your opinion or anything, but I think giving Adelman one more year and then let him train a successor from within his own staff might be less of a gamble than picking someone and changing the system altogether. We played well to end the season (2nd half), i think we should build on it vs. having to start all over which is what's going to happen with a new coach.
x-
Analyst
Posts: 3,511
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 06, 2005

Re: The Adelman dilemma 

Post#14 » by x- » Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:33 am

Really the only thing that gives me pause is the T-Will situation and Adelman's reluctance to let young players play through their mistakes in general, though the more I think about it the clearer it appears to me that Adelman is not the guy to 'blame' here.

I understand why Adelman doesn't trust T-Will, considering Terrence has played rather poorly other than in the Portland game and you can't blame Adelman for trying to win and go with the guys that are the most consistent, the guys he trusts the most.

Like AB said, the margin of error is very small. A couple of boneheaded plays (by Jordan Hill), a couple of unforced turnovers (by Ish Smith) or a couple of bad shots (by T-Will) often end up being the difference in a game. That's why teams with a lot of rookies usually suck. They're talented, but they're making way too much mistakes and often end up beating themselfes.

T-Will, Hill or Ish might very well end up being good players, but they won't win games for you now.
No coach will go with guys who might be good one day, instead of the guys who're good now. No coach will go with a guy who might play well, instead of a guy who's solid and productive night in and night out.
Not if the team's priority is making the playoffs, which brings me to my next point.

If anything the 'blame' should go to the Morey and the front office who haven't put Adelman in a good position. I mean, what's the plan here?
I trust Morey and think he's one of the best, if not the best GM in the league, but this team, as currently constructed has no real direction.
What's the priority? To win? Or teach to develop the young players?
I understand that Yao and to a certain degree Brooks getting hurt had something to do with the team having no direction, but that shouldn't reflect badly on Adelman now, should it?

I also don't buy the no championship argument.
The only team he's coached that was talented enough to win it all was the 2001/2002 Kings team and we all know what happened there.
Same thing with Adelman not being a good defensive coach.
He's no Thibodeau or JVG, but anytime Adelman has had good defensive players, his teams were top-5 in defensive efficiency.

So yeah, I hope the T-Will situation is still repairable, but by all means BRING ADELMAN BACK.
User avatar
Aaron Brooks
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,148
And1: 629
Joined: Jan 14, 2008

Re: The Adelman dilemma 

Post#15 » by Aaron Brooks » Fri Apr 15, 2011 3:12 am

Myths about Adelman:

- He's not a championship caliber coach
Lost to Jordan in the finals, ran into a corrupt NBA official with the Kings, almost upset the Spurs with his Kings, almost upset the Lakers with the Rockets
- He doesn't preach defense
His teams have routinely been in the top 10 in defense, we just happen to be missing our defensive anchor the past 2 years
- He draws up bad plays
I remember many instances where he drew up good plays (Novak, Alston, Brooks, Martin game winners), some of which failed due to missed shots (Brooks in the season opener)
- He doesn't develop players
Refer to my earlier post
baki wrote:Harden is essentially a very good role player, he's not a franchise player.
User avatar
College Boy
Analyst
Posts: 3,708
And1: 5
Joined: Jul 18, 2005
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: The Adelman dilemma 

Post#16 » by College Boy » Fri Apr 15, 2011 6:40 am

x- wrote:If anything the 'blame' should go to the Morey and the front office who haven't put Adelman in a good position. I mean, what's the plan here?
I trust Morey and think he's one of the best, if not the best GM in the league, but this team, as currently constructed has no real direction.
What's the priority? To win? Or teach to develop the young players?
I understand that Yao and to a certain degree Brooks getting hurt had something to do with the team having no direction, but that shouldn't reflect badly on Adelman now, should it?


Yao being hurt has everything to do with our lack of direction. We would all be singing a different tune about this roster if we had a 100% healthy Yao. It just sucks that the injury bug migrates to Houston for the winter.
KiDdFrESh wrote:No way Utah passes up on a solid white guy at center. He'd be perfect fit for the Jazz.
User avatar
zapatasblood
General Manager
Posts: 7,629
And1: 580
Joined: Jul 03, 2010
Location: Stank-O-Dena
     

Re: The Adelman dilemma 

Post#17 » by zapatasblood » Fri Apr 15, 2011 3:00 pm

PocketRockets wrote:
zapatasblood wrote:I vote to not extend him. He is a good coach and can do a lot of things like get a average team to play good and get you the playoffs but he can win a ring. 20 some odd years tell me so and he has had some very good teams. I think there are a few coaches out there some whom we may not know about but you have to give someone a chance. I am hoping for the Shaw or whatever his name is in L.A.


1) We're not going to win a ring anytime in the next 3-4 years. With Miami, Chi, OKC, there's no way we can develop faster than them. I say stay competitive, make the playoffs, make the 2nd or 3rd round and I'll consider it a success.

2) Go with someone that CAN coach vs someone that might be able to coach? I don't need a hall of fame coach, but I'd like a coach with some coaching experience. From that first article, it sounds like that's not even a requisite for Morey?

Get an average team to play good. You make it sound so easy. I'm not trying to nitpick your opinion or anything, but I think giving Adelman one more year and then let him train a successor from within his own staff might be less of a gamble than picking someone and changing the system altogether. We played well to end the season (2nd half), i think we should build on it vs. having to start all over which is what's going to happen with a new coach.


I did not make it sound easy or at least I think I didn't because what he did was intense. Rick is not a coach that will mentor his successor or does not seem like he will. Rick wants a ring and does not want to teach so that in it self makes me think he is gone specially if you give him one year. Unless Morey makes some type of trade that blows his mind he will be leaving, so you might as well go for it now while there are some real good candidates out there.
Light beer is for pregnant woman and children
"How sweet it is!" -Gene Peterson
And you never once paid for drugs Not once
NashyMing
Junior
Posts: 390
And1: 6
Joined: Mar 14, 2011

Re: The Adelman dilemma 

Post#18 » by NashyMing » Fri Apr 15, 2011 3:08 pm

Adelman is a very good coach. He's one of best coaches in the league. I don't see the Rockets would be able to get an upgrade over Adelman. The only one I see that is available and maybe on the same level is Jeff Van Gundy, but I would say it's a literal move not worth risking. If Jerry Sloan is looking for a come back and willing to join the Rockets, I would consider him too. However, I don't really see either as upgrade over Adelman.

The best things for the Rockets would be the chemistry among players and I would give a lot of credits to Rick Adelman for maintaining the locker room.

If the Rockets do not keep Adelman, I would be really disappointed.

On the other hand, I would definitely like the Raptors to pick him up.

Note: I am fans of both Rockets and Raptors.
Image
Let's NBA!
User avatar
aznkillabeezZz
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,309
And1: 3
Joined: Nov 14, 2005

Re: The Adelman dilemma 

Post#19 » by aznkillabeezZz » Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:46 am

Jerry Sloan is an upgrade over Adelman. But I don't think I'm ready to see his smug face on the bench every game. He looks like he's always upset. If we lose adelman, we'd be like the jazz without Sloan. A below par team. No coach can produce miracles without their star player, and Adelman has a beyond respectable record this season. If it wasn't for Memphis strong showing, we'd be 8th.
Image
User avatar
TMU
Forum Mod - Rockets
Forum Mod - Rockets
Posts: 30,188
And1: 10,413
Joined: Jan 02, 2005
Location: O.R.
       

Re: The Adelman dilemma 

Post#20 » by TMU » Sat Apr 16, 2011 11:29 am

To be a championship caliber team, I think it's better off having a good experienced coach. I think we already have that in Adelman, and I can't think of a better replacement. It makes no sense taking a chance on Shaw or Turner when Morey has made significant strides rebuilding the team.

Return to Houston Rockets