LyricalRico wrote:
I didn't see any UCLA games so the tournament was the first I saw of Honeycutt but he intrigued me. Reminded me a lot of Matt Barnes, but maybe with a little more offensive skill and ready to contribute right away. I guess #18 would be too high to take a guy like that in most drafts, but it might be just right this year. He'd be an option if we went big in the lottery.
I like but don't love Honeycutt. He isn't too efficient on offense, but neither was Westbrook at UCLA. With his length and athleticism, I wonder if Honeycutt could develop into a Batum-like player.
dangermouse wrote:If we drop to 5th or below, i'd happily trade the pick for Wes Johnson.
Hmmm....how high a pick would you give up for Evan Turner?
And, what's with everyone wanting Booker to be a SF? I thought he might fit there in the beginning of the season, before I saw him play. Booker was not nearly as good at SF as at PF this season, doesn't have any handle to speak of, or a mid-range shot. Outside of Wall, no position on this team couldn't use an upgrade. Draft talent first and find the fit later. BPA, BPA, BPA. Even if that is Irving, try to draft him then trade him.
There also seems to be a common sentiment that we should take safe, mature players, so we can get better faster and Wall won't want to leave at the end of his contract. There are mature, hard working players available every year in the draft and in FA. Players that have the upside to be truly elite are more rare. We need to try to draft a star, even at the risk of missing on a pick, and worry about filling in mature, role players later. This team shouldn't be racing to 40 win mediocrity. We should be aiming for a championship. How much do players like Derron Williams and possibly Dwight Howard appreciate playing on a good team every year that has little chance of winning a championship? When on a 50 win team with solid surrounding pieces, most want to leave for a potential 60 win team that has another star or two.






























