5DOM wrote:I hope another team does pick Kanter over Williams. That would make me so happy if we stay at 3
I hope we get BPA. If it's Kanter then I want him, if it's D Will then I want him.
Moderators: Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX
5DOM wrote:I hope another team does pick Kanter over Williams. That would make me so happy if we stay at 3
Indeed wrote:Kevin Willis wrote:Bertans is interesting. I don't know about his rebounding ability but he's a shooter who can drive better than a Kapono. He can be a Miller-lite type of guy eventually. Funny that he's very different from Vesely at similar heights and position. He's more of a Euro-league shooter and Vesely is more of a skinny Griffin in his game.
I would draft him in the second-round since we need shooting.
Here's Leonard's report btw:
http://www.draftexpress.com/article/Fin ... nard-3695/
I think he would fit in well with this team. But he doesn't strengthen our weakness in shooting.
We don't have 2nd round pick. We traded for Delfino (now Amir), which is worthy imo.
I am not high on him, I would prefer someone has quickness to come off the bench and break opponent defense.
And I don't think our shooting is that bad, but since no one can create for others, our shooting will suffer (no open looks). However, we are stacked at the PG/SG with no good passer/court vision player.
5DOM wrote:Saying the Pistons had the most pedestrian cast to win the Championship may be unfair, but at the same time the make-up of that team was definitely the most unusual. You might say they had 5 all stars, but they weren't exactly your typical all stars either. East was pretty weak then as well
Kevin Willis wrote:Indeed wrote:Kevin Willis wrote:Bertans is interesting. I don't know about his rebounding ability but he's a shooter who can drive better than a Kapono. He can be a Miller-lite type of guy eventually. Funny that he's very different from Vesely at similar heights and position. He's more of a Euro-league shooter and Vesely is more of a skinny Griffin in his game.
I would draft him in the second-round since we need shooting.
Here's Leonard's report btw:
http://www.draftexpress.com/article/Fin ... nard-3695/
I think he would fit in well with this team. But he doesn't strengthen our weakness in shooting.
We don't have 2nd round pick. We traded for Delfino (now Amir), which is worthy imo.
I am not high on him, I would prefer someone has quickness to come off the bench and break opponent defense.
And I don't think our shooting is that bad, but since no one can create for others, our shooting will suffer (no open looks). However, we are stacked at the PG/SG with no good passer/court vision player.
We can always buy a second so it's not impossible. We don't have any pure shooters that can stretch the floor without a penetrating guard. No Korver/Miller/Redd/J.Johnson/Allen/Pierce/House/Harden/etc. He wouldn't hurt for a second round guy.
Rapsobsessed7 wrote:ok then let D.Will drop to us whoever picks Kanter above D-Will thats a huge mistake IMO
gerrit4 wrote:Rapsobsessed7 wrote:ok then let D.Will drop to us whoever picks Kanter above D-Will thats a huge mistake IMO
I really like Kanter as a prospect, but there's a lot of question marks around him compared to D-Will. I'd be thrilled to get D-Will at 3.

Reignman wrote:gerrit4 wrote:Rapsobsessed7 wrote:ok then let D.Will drop to us whoever picks Kanter above D-Will thats a huge mistake IMO
I really like Kanter as a prospect, but there's a lot of question marks around him compared to D-Will. I'd be thrilled to get D-Will at 3.
Just a question but what if it turns out that D Will is a tweener or more suited to play PF? Would you still feel the same way?
5DOM wrote:Reignman wrote:gerrit4 wrote:
I really like Kanter as a prospect, but there's a lot of question marks around him compared to D-Will. I'd be thrilled to get D-Will at 3.
Just a question but what if it turns out that D Will is a tweener or more suited to play PF? Would you still feel the same way?
I think it's going to be hard to determine his position in the next 30 or so days, but even if he is a PF I'd still pick him and look to trade Amir. The question mark with Williams is smaller than that with Kanter IMO.

5DOM wrote:I just think Williams is a clear cut top 2 prospect in this draft and easily the BPA if Irving's off the board. The only concern with Williams is obviously his NBA position but compared to concerns with Kanter, I don't think it's that big of a deal.
Reignman wrote:gerrit4 wrote:Rapsobsessed7 wrote:ok then let D.Will drop to us whoever picks Kanter above D-Will thats a huge mistake IMO
I really like Kanter as a prospect, but there's a lot of question marks around him compared to D-Will. I'd be thrilled to get D-Will at 3.
Just a question but what if it turns out that D Will is a tweener or more suited to play PF? Would you still feel the same way?

Reignman wrote:5DOM wrote:I just think Williams is a clear cut top 2 prospect in this draft and easily the BPA if Irving's off the board. The only concern with Williams is obviously his NBA position but compared to concerns with Kanter, I don't think it's that big of a deal.
What if the scouts don't agree with you? On the last page I posted an article and it seems that some scouts have Kanter ranked higher.
Now again, for me as a fan with no scouting experience I'd still say it's irving/dwill/kanter, but again, I'm no scout and it doesn't seem to be as cut and dried as you make it seem.
gerrit4 wrote:Reignman wrote:gerrit4 wrote:
I really like Kanter as a prospect, but there's a lot of question marks around him compared to D-Will. I'd be thrilled to get D-Will at 3.
Just a question but what if it turns out that D Will is a tweener or more suited to play PF? Would you still feel the same way?
Yes.
If we were keeping Bosh last year, I would have rather drafted Ed Davis than Larry Sanders, Luke Babbit, Avery Bradley or even Eric Bledsoe - all of whom would have been less redundant than having Davis & Bosh. The same with how we'd all rather have had Aldridge than Bargnani or Morrison.
The way I see it, Williams is the clear cut 2nd best prospect right now. If we're able to draft him, we can figure out what to do with the logjam later on. In his first year he'd probably be playing both the 3 and 4 - we'd get a good chance to see how his skill-set translates to the NBA.
I understand why people see a need for fit - if you develop a player in the wrong position or in a logjammed position he may never develop into the player he has the potential to be. But in this case, he seems to be a much lower risk than any of the other players. Is he a great fit with Derozan, Bayless, Davis and Amir? I wouldn't say so, there's a lot of athleticism without a creator, center or pure shooters. But I don't think we're that close to being competitive anyways.
I'm not hating on Kanter, Jonas or even Byombo. If we draft any of those guys I'll be excited for their potential and what they can bring to this roster. If either of those three turn into good players, they'd fit in immediately. But they come with a lot question marks. D-Will comes with two - is he a versatile player or a tweener? and can he defend at the NBA level? Even if he's a tweener with so-so defense, he still may be the best player in this draft.