Bynum's Suspension

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Joker
RealGM
Posts: 17,846
And1: 7,276
Joined: Feb 05, 2003

Re: Bynum's Suspension 

Post#181 » by Joker » Mon May 9, 2011 12:46 am

10 games, and he has to be Barea's butler from now until the start of training camp.
sefant77
Banned User
Posts: 3,198
And1: 6
Joined: Sep 07, 2008

Re: Bynum's Suspension 

Post#182 » by sefant77 » Mon May 9, 2011 12:47 am

LALegend wrote:
Second of all, lost in all of this is what happened right before this occurred. Barea had the ball at the top of the key and bumped Steve Blake with his shoulder, which I thought was an offensive foul and would have been called had Blake fallen. I think Bynum saw that and retaliated. But Barea isn't completely innocent here.


Wait wat...because Barea maybe put his shoulder a little bit into Blake (not even so strong that he fell to the floor) justify a mid-air take down? Are u f serious?

And the other thing: 3rd time he does that. He allready took one guy to the hospital with the same move.
Tave
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,356
And1: 1,356
Joined: Feb 09, 2011
 

Re: Bynum's Suspension 

Post#183 » by Tave » Mon May 9, 2011 12:47 am

FaithPuppeteer wrote:
BarbaGrizz wrote:Bynum is an overrated punk. Can we all agree that Marc Gasol is the better player?


He is, but you're not going to convince me that JJ is a likable guy.


I've always liked Barea, and I'm not even a Dallas fan. You've got to respect a guy his size that can compete in the NBA.
Karma_Engineer
Banned User
Posts: 365
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 05, 2010

Re: Bynum's Suspension 

Post#184 » by Karma_Engineer » Mon May 9, 2011 12:47 am

FaithPuppeteer wrote:
Karma_Engineer wrote:Earlier FP you were saying that Bynum should have hit Barea harder....smh


I threw a tantrum and got over it. But hey, if you're going to do something like that...show some conviction.


Lol, a hypocrite calling for conviction? Now I've seen it all.
FaithPuppeteer
Banned User
Posts: 851
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 15, 2010

Re: Bynum's Suspension 

Post#185 » by FaithPuppeteer » Mon May 9, 2011 12:48 am

mefromthefuture wrote:
FaithPuppeteer wrote:Beasley's wigwam/hair-do was an affront to the eyes, but he didn't deserve that.



What your the guy!


FaithPuppeteer wrote:Waaaah, poor Michael Measly. Dude only stands out what little he does because of the black hole of a team he's on. Excessive suspension.

You'd think that wigwam Measley is sporting would've protected his head as it bounced off the court anyways.


FaithPuppeteer wrote:League should double Bynum's pay for two games for shutting Measly's mouth.


viewtopic.php?f=6&t=1101258&start=75


Yeah, Beasley's awful. His mouth is wildly disproportionate to any talent he might have.
Tave
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,356
And1: 1,356
Joined: Feb 09, 2011
 

Re: Bynum's Suspension 

Post#186 » by Tave » Mon May 9, 2011 12:48 am

Joker wrote:10 games, and he has to be Barea's butler from now until the start of training camp.


Remember Jerry, it's not a lie if you believe it.
LALegend
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,397
And1: 14
Joined: Jul 09, 2010

Re: Bynum's Suspension 

Post#187 » by LALegend » Mon May 9, 2011 12:48 am

Striders wrote:
LALegend wrote:I'm not trying to justify what he did, but some of the people in this thread are way out of line. Wishing career ending injuries on another human being? That's as pathetic as what Bynum did to Barea. A sledgehammer to the head? Are you kidding me?

Second of all, lost in all of this is what happened right before this occurred. Barea had the ball at the top of the key and bumped Steve Blake with his shoulder, which I thought was an offensive foul and would have been called had Blake fallen. I think Bynum saw that and retaliated. But Barea isn't completely innocent here.


...Wow.

What's wrong with what I said? Bynum retaliated because he saw something he didn't like. Seems pretty logical to me. I didn't say it was Barea's fault, but that push on Blake, in my opinion, definitely provoked him.
34Dayz on Smush Parker
34Dayz wrote:If he was given a few years to develop I could see him being a Star.
34Dayz wrote:I think because he has a silly name people will never take him seriously.
FaithPuppeteer
Banned User
Posts: 851
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 15, 2010

Re: Bynum's Suspension 

Post#188 » by FaithPuppeteer » Mon May 9, 2011 12:48 am

Karma_Engineer wrote:
FaithPuppeteer wrote:
Karma_Engineer wrote:Earlier FP you were saying that Bynum should have hit Barea harder....smh


I threw a tantrum and got over it. But hey, if you're going to do something like that...show some conviction.


Lol, a hypocrite calling for conviction? Now I've seen it all.


Hey, if you're going to be the bad guy, earn it. He could've swung his arm down and given him some added momentum on his way to the hardwood.
LALegend
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,397
And1: 14
Joined: Jul 09, 2010

Re: Bynum's Suspension 

Post#189 » by LALegend » Mon May 9, 2011 12:51 am

jazzfan1971 wrote:
LALegend wrote:I'm not trying to justify what he did, but some of the people in this thread are way out of line. Wishing career ending injuries on another human being? That's as pathetic as what Bynum did to Barea. A sledgehammer to the head? Are you kidding me?

Second of all, lost in all of this is what happened right before this occurred. Barea had the ball at the top of the key and bumped Steve Blake with his shoulder, which I thought was an offensive foul and would have been called had Blake fallen. I think Bynum saw that and retaliated. But Barea isn't completely innocent here.


I'm not sure you know what 'justify' means.

I guess I'll explain since people are taking it the wrong way. I said Bynum retaliated because of Barea's push on Blake. I did NOT say that Barea pushing Blake made it OK for Bynum to foul him. I obviously think Bynum was wrong, and will be suspended, I was just making an observation that I thought he was retaliating.
34Dayz on Smush Parker
34Dayz wrote:If he was given a few years to develop I could see him being a Star.
34Dayz wrote:I think because he has a silly name people will never take him seriously.
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,293
And1: 10,065
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

Re: Bynum's Suspension 

Post#190 » by Blame Rasho » Mon May 9, 2011 12:51 am

Yes... that push on Blake caused all of this... Who are you trying to kid?
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,293
And1: 10,065
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

Re: Bynum's Suspension 

Post#191 » by Blame Rasho » Mon May 9, 2011 12:52 am

FaithPuppeteer, you got served...
schneiderjazz
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,056
And1: 19
Joined: Mar 16, 2005
Location: Brazil

Re: Bynum's Suspension 

Post#192 » by schneiderjazz » Mon May 9, 2011 12:52 am

10 games minimum.
Image
User avatar
Striders
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,281
And1: 252
Joined: Nov 30, 2009

Re: Bynum's Suspension 

Post#193 » by Striders » Mon May 9, 2011 12:53 am

LALegend wrote:I guess I'll explain since people are taking it the wrong way. I said Bynum retaliated because of Barea's push on Blake. I did NOT say that Barea pushing Blake made it OK for Bynum to foul him. I obviously think Bynum was wrong, and will be suspended, I was just making an observation that I thought he was retaliating.


You said that Barea was not completely innocent in this. Sounds like you're trying to say that he was at least partially asking to get cheap shotted. :-?
Success is how high you bounce when you hit bottom. ~George Smith Patton
LALegend
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,397
And1: 14
Joined: Jul 09, 2010

Re: Bynum's Suspension 

Post#194 » by LALegend » Mon May 9, 2011 12:53 am

sefant77 wrote:
LALegend wrote:
Second of all, lost in all of this is what happened right before this occurred. Barea had the ball at the top of the key and bumped Steve Blake with his shoulder, which I thought was an offensive foul and would have been called had Blake fallen. I think Bynum saw that and retaliated. But Barea isn't completely innocent here.


Wait wat...because Barea maybe put his shoulder a little bit into Blake (not even so strong that he fell to the floor) justify a mid-air take down? Are u f serious?

And the other thing: 3rd time he does that. He allready took one guy to the hospital with the same move.

Come on man. I'm not trying to justify it. If you read my whole post, I said it in the first sentence. Its an observation, not a justification. I think Barea's push on Blake provoked Bynum to foul him, but it didn't make it the right thing to do.
34Dayz on Smush Parker
34Dayz wrote:If he was given a few years to develop I could see him being a Star.
34Dayz wrote:I think because he has a silly name people will never take him seriously.
User avatar
St Knick
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,686
And1: 360
Joined: Mar 01, 2010

Re: Bynum's Suspension 

Post#195 » by St Knick » Mon May 9, 2011 12:54 am

10 games soudn right...
hes got a history of doing this... it was SUCH a dirty play, he should be ashamed
KNICKS FAN FOR LIFE
Karma_Engineer
Banned User
Posts: 365
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 05, 2010

Re: Bynum's Suspension 

Post#196 » by Karma_Engineer » Mon May 9, 2011 12:54 am

LALegend wrote:
jazzfan1971 wrote:
LALegend wrote:I'm not trying to justify what he did, but some of the people in this thread are way out of line. Wishing career ending injuries on another human being? That's as pathetic as what Bynum did to Barea. A sledgehammer to the head? Are you kidding me?

Second of all, lost in all of this is what happened right before this occurred. Barea had the ball at the top of the key and bumped Steve Blake with his shoulder, which I thought was an offensive foul and would have been called had Blake fallen. I think Bynum saw that and retaliated. But Barea isn't completely innocent here.


I'm not sure you know what 'justify' means.

I guess I'll explain since people are taking it the wrong way. I said Bynum retaliated because of Barea's push on Blake. I did NOT say that Barea pushing Blake made it OK for Bynum to foul him. I obviously think Bynum was wrong, and will be suspended, I was just making an observation that I thought he was retaliating.


Maybe it had to do with the fact that the Lakers were being blown out in a game, with the culmination of the teams failures and the inability to show their faces afterwards in L.A. and their unforgiving fans? Lol @ one meaningless play being the reason Bynum made a terrible decision.
FaithPuppeteer
Banned User
Posts: 851
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 15, 2010

Re: Bynum's Suspension 

Post#197 » by FaithPuppeteer » Mon May 9, 2011 12:54 am

Blame Rasho wrote:FaithPuppeteer, you got served...


OK.
User avatar
Bled
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,640
And1: 261
Joined: Dec 09, 2010

Re: Bynum's Suspension 

Post#198 » by Bled » Mon May 9, 2011 12:55 am

Id say 10 games at least just for the sheer fact that hes done this twice before.
FaithPuppeteer
Banned User
Posts: 851
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 15, 2010

Re: Bynum's Suspension 

Post#199 » by FaithPuppeteer » Mon May 9, 2011 12:56 am

Bled wrote:Id say 10 games at least just for the sheer fact that hes done this twice before.


Yeah, at a minimum given his history.
LALegend
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,397
And1: 14
Joined: Jul 09, 2010

Re: Bynum's Suspension 

Post#200 » by LALegend » Mon May 9, 2011 12:56 am

Blame Rasho wrote:Yes... that push on Blake caused all of this... Who are you trying to kid?

LMAO, how hard is it to understand you a**holes. Its an observation, not a justification or explanation.
34Dayz on Smush Parker
34Dayz wrote:If he was given a few years to develop I could see him being a Star.
34Dayz wrote:I think because he has a silly name people will never take him seriously.

Return to The General Board