HomoSapien wrote:This is ridiculous. There is no player in the NBA that's capable of averaging 10 lazy rebounds a game for his entire career.
I don't get it either.
Moderators: HomoSapien, coldfish, RedBulls23, Michael Jackson, Ice Man, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, AshyLarrysDiaper
HomoSapien wrote:This is ridiculous. There is no player in the NBA that's capable of averaging 10 lazy rebounds a game for his entire career.
Red Larrivee wrote:HomoSapien wrote:This is ridiculous. There is no player in the NBA that's capable of averaging 10 lazy rebounds a game for his entire career.
I don't get it either.
Red Larrivee wrote:HomoSapien wrote:This is ridiculous. There is no player in the NBA that's capable of averaging 10 lazy rebounds a game for his entire career.
I don't get it either.
Red Larrivee wrote:Wouldn't stopping penetration qualify as one of the reasons to not leave near the paint? Either way, there's no such thing as a player who gets a lazy 10 rebounds. Boozer regardless of how you wanna pick it, is an excellent rebounder.
Red Larrivee wrote:For his career Boozer averages 2.6 oreb's per game, which would be just below the Top-20 in the league. So yes, he is an excellent rebounder at his best.
I'm not making an argument that Boozer makes proper rotations. Just making the argument that it's impossible to get a lazy 10 rebounds per game in the NBA for 9 seasons.
jl342323 wrote:me too. i just dont see it. they are saying rather than playing defense and rotate, boozer looks for rebounds. do you guys see that?
and i dont get people calling him out for not setting a good screen. plz tell me a pick n roll player who sets a mean screen
its just ridiculous
ManualRam wrote:boozer is big. hes strong. he can hold his position. if you're a horrible, lazy defender and box out instead of challenging shots, which he's done his entire career, you can maintain that early position if you're strong enough.
im saying, if he made proper rotations or actually challenged shots more often he wouldnt be getting as many boards as he has throughout his career.
do you think boozer gets boards outside of his area?
also, how many times do you see boozer get called for a push in the back on o-board opportunities? now think of the times that he does not. now that is a lazy tactic.
Red Larrivee wrote:ManualRam wrote:boozer is big. hes strong. he can hold his position. if you're a horrible, lazy defender and box out instead of challenging shots, which he's done his entire career, you can maintain that early position if you're strong enough.
im saying, if he made proper rotations or actually challenged shots more often he wouldnt be getting as many boards as he has throughout his career.
do you think boozer gets boards outside of his area?
also, how many times do you see boozer get called for a push in the back on o-board opportunities? now think of the times that he does not. now that is a lazy tactic.
All of this sounds too tin foil hatish. I've never heard of a player who gets a lot of rebounds because
1. He's lazy.
2. He's always out of position defensively.
Do you realize how extremely fortunate you have to be to grab 10 boards a game for 9 seasons in the NBA while doing that? Be real. And even with your theory, there are players who close out defensively, contest shots, make good rotations and still average a ton of rebounds. So it's not a given that if Boozer did that, he still wouldn't be a vaccum on the glass. He's always been a good rebounder.
jl342323 wrote:ah i get it now. you are all convinced by this dude's videos boozer bashing video. did you know he said rondo was the best point guard in the nba? i stopped watching his videos after that. rather than having your own opinion on something, you go with what others are saying. ya'll are conformists. thats all i get from it
HomoSapien wrote:ManualRam wrote:HomoSapien wrote:Because through the regular season he was our second best scorer and rebounder. Maybe he hasn't been as good as you may have expected, but it obviously takes a lot of effort to put up 18 and 10.
i think boozer struggles in the aspects of the game that require effort.
Rebounding?
Vince Strong wrote:
hell yes he struggles with rebounding. watch the number of rebounds boozer gets uncontested. if he has 10rebs, 9 of them are uncontested. this is something i watch very closely. gibson and noah fight for rebounds. Asik tries to, but lacks coordination. boozer? he loses almost every contested rebound or isnt even involved in the fight.
its 100% true. i used to think he was a good rebounder. like most people, i looked at his stats as the indicator. if you watch closer, he clearly isnt a good rebounder. off rebs per 36min is a great indicator of how good a rebounder someone is. boozer is fourth on the team. - a distant one at that and gets half as many as Noah and Asik. that is telling.

ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
HomoSapien wrote:All I'm getting from this is that Carlos Boozer would be the greatest of all time if he tried.
drivewayball wrote:Isn't it amazing that so many of us are so much smarter than people who are so much more successful than we are ... and are owning and running NBA franchises?

