Does Dirk with title surpass KG

Moderators: trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ

richboy
RealGM
Posts: 25,424
And1: 2,487
Joined: Sep 01, 2003

Re: Does Dirk with title surpass KG 

Post#181 » by richboy » Thu May 26, 2011 7:03 am

rrravenred wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:
richboy wrote:Bogut then has a case to be a better shot blocker than Tim Duncan. Is there really a point. I'm going to say Duncan is still a better defender than Duncan. I've never had a Buck fan argue that Bogut was as good as Dwight defensively.


Then you haven't been paying attention. It's a minority opinion, but it exists.


Sidebar, your honor?

Comparable or on a par with is usually the argument. Very few have dared make the definitive statement.

Dwight's athleticism means that he's a significantly better defensive rebounder and better "space eater" around the court, wheras Bogut is generally considered (in this view) a slightly smarter positional defender and shotblocker. The charges drawn for each player tends to support this view.

There are some interesting stats around on what happens to the ball AFTER it's been blocked, and Bogut tends to block "to advantage" wheras Howard's end up in the stands. Bogut's also half-a-point better per 100 possessions on the defensive side of the ball, FWIW, although the appalling state of Milwaukee's big-man stocks might have something to do with that.


Just to note the Magic don't really believe in keeping block shots in bounds. To often they found the block shot would go back to the offense and the defense would be out of position. Just like an offensive rebound. Leading to a wide open shot. They rather you have to inbound the ball again against a set defense.

In terms of Howard vs Bogut. I'm sure there is some out there that have that opinion. Problem is these two get to play against each other. That is why I don't see many Buck fans making that claim. Bogut has had a tough time even scoring on Dwight Howard. Dwight is doing fine against Bogut. Bogut gets his rebounds nearly doubled. Can't block many shots since he busy with Dwight. Career wise scores 7 points per game against Dwight. With like 8 games in single digits. Many games shooting in the 20% range. Career wise 42% against Dwight.

I actually love Bogut. Reality is only thing Bogut does better than Dwight is pass the ball. We talked about Gortat before. IMO Gortat as a starter is going to be pretty much Andrew Bogut.
"Talent is God-given. Be humble. Fame is man-given. Be grateful. Conceit is self-given. Be careful." John Wooden
User avatar
WhateverBro
Head Coach
Posts: 6,739
And1: 1,579
Joined: Jan 17, 2005
Location: Sweden
 

Re: Does Dirk with title surpass KG 

Post#182 » by WhateverBro » Thu May 26, 2011 7:28 am

richboy wrote:
KG was not an elite offensive player. He was a good offensive player. Comparing KG to Dirk offensively is a joke. Laughable. Should get you banned. KG was a force fed midrange jump shooter. Had a decent post game but nothing amazing.

In KG career only 1 time did he score over 21 ppg per 36. His numbers get inflated by huge minute totals. Most of his career he is barely 20 points per 36. Dirk is playing less minutes and scoring more. He is well above 21 points per 36 almost every year of his career. Since the start of his career the only year he wasn't was the year Dallas decided to let Antoine Walker and Jamison chuck. People don't realize that Dirk only played 34 minutes during the year. If he had played Kevin Durant minutes he would have been battling for a scoring title.

Dirk >>> KG on offense. You want to say he made it up on defense that is fine. The reason why KG gets overrated on these boards is because somehow people think he is elite offensively. Somehow he is better than Dwight Howard on defense.


You obviously missed KG's prime. There is no doubt in my mind he was an elite offensive player in his prime. You have to factor what he did on the defensive end and his rebounding when you think about his offensive game. He was consistently over 20 ppg for 10 years with the wolves, together with 5+ assists, I don't understand how that isn't elite offensive production. No, he was never a volume scorer but his offensive impact was huge for the Timberwolves. And no, his postgame wasn't, or isn't decent, he has an excellent post game with a variety of moves, it's just that he doesn't use it nearly enough to be called a post scorer. That's a diferent story though.
User avatar
rrravenred
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 6,117
And1: 589
Joined: Feb 24, 2006
Location: Pulling at the loose threads of arguments since 2006

Re: Does Dirk with title surpass KG 

Post#183 » by rrravenred » Thu May 26, 2011 7:42 am

richboy wrote:Just to note the Magic don't really believe in keeping block shots in bounds. To often they found the block shot would go back to the offense and the defense would be out of position. Just like an offensive rebound. Leading to a wide open shot. They rather you have to inbound the ball again against a set defense.


This is my point. Bogut blocks to advantage where his team gets the ball back. You can argue that it's a "scrappy bucks team fighting for every loose ball" if you like, but I'd respectfully disagree. It's a stat that (I feel) gets backed up by the eye test.

richboy wrote:In terms of Howard vs Bogut. I'm sure there is some out there that have that opinion. Problem is these two get to play against each other. That is why I don't see many Buck fans making that claim. Bogut has had a tough time even scoring on Dwight Howard. Dwight is doing fine against Bogut. Bogut gets his rebounds nearly doubled. Can't block many shots since he busy with Dwight. Career wise scores 7 points per game against Dwight. With like 8 games in single digits. Many games shooting in the 20% range. Career wise 42% against Dwight.


With respect, head to head is a freaking awful way of measuring overall defensive impact on a team against all opponents. Dwight has, however, definitely had Bogie's number over the years(averaging 18/14 at 57% from the field).

Fifteen or so games doesn't disqualify the 380-odd other games during his career.

richboy wrote:I actually love Bogut. Reality is only thing Bogut does better than Dwight is pass the ball. We talked about Gortat before. IMO Gortat as a starter is going to be pretty much Andrew Bogut.
ElGee wrote:You, my friend, have shoved those words into my mouth, which is OK because I'm hungry.


Got fallacy?
drza
Analyst
Posts: 3,518
And1: 1,861
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Does Dirk with title surpass KG 

Post#184 » by drza » Thu May 26, 2011 1:21 pm

richboy wrote:Here some issues I have.

Before KG left Minnesota was already falling. They were 21 in the league in defense. Forget the fact I can't imagine a team with Dwight Howard on it being at the botton of the league in defense. Fact is its very possible Minny was going to be a bad defense with or without KG. Also would point out that they replaced KG with a horrible defensive big in Al Jefferson.


One reason I like having these kinds of debates is that I often learn something I didn't know. See, I didn't come to my conclusions by looking at the stats...I used to watch the Wolves play on a regular basis and it was blatant that KG's impact was huge, but it wasn't until later on with the advent of the advanced stats that there were tools to quantitatively show it. I was reminded of this just now because, in order to rebut this point I had to go back and look again at that "21st" ranked Wolves defense in 2007. And in doing so, I learned something yet again.

KG sat out 6 games in the 2006-07 season. During those 6 absences, the Wolves gave up 117.5 points/game on 51% shooting from the field. I point this out here not as another argument for how bad the cast was (though seriously, look at those numbers again), but instead because those 6 games were SO bad that they actually skewed the overall results for the year. After spending some time navigating the complex way B-R calculates team defensive rating, I was able to quantify just how much those 6 games changed things:

overall season: Wolves DRtg = 107.9 (21st in NBA)
6 games w/o KG: Wolves DRTG = 121.6 (on pace for worst in NBA by FAR)
76 games w/ KG: Wolves DRTG = 106.5 (tied for 14th in NBA)

Again, the point isn't to pile on for how bad KG's teammates were (should be self evident by now). In fact, you can actually ignore the 6 games KG didn't play if you want to, because the more germane point is that when KG DID play the Wolves weren't one of the worst defenses in the league. In fact, they were again right there at league average.

Which means that most of your points in this paragraph no longer have any basis. KG didn't lead a bottom-feeding defense in 2007, despite having a putrid cast. Which also means that you can't really support the notion that the Wolves were likely to have a terrible defense in '08 with or without KG. Which, again, makes their immediate fall to arguably THE worst defense in the league since KG left more support for just how much heavy lifting KG was doing in Minnesota.

richboy wrote:My next issue is KG pulled Minny up to mediocre defense. That very well may be possible. I just don't see how that means KG has greater impact defensively than other dominate defensive big men. Most years of Hakeem's career Houston was an elite defense. Same with Dwight, Zo, Duncan.

No question KG has impact defensively. The question is the impact as great as adjusted plus minus suggest. People are saying Dwight Howard is no KG. KG has bigger impact than Tim Duncan. I'm just looking and wondering what is this based on. Looks like by some KG is playing with a group of HS kids in Minnesota. Because the reality is the only way you can suggest KG is comparable in defensive impact to those top bigs is say well Minnesota may have had the worst starting 5 of all-time. (snip)


I snipped here because I want to keep the arguments that you're making clear. You say that you disagree with the APM results (from 2003-04 thru 2010-11), but the rest of your post talks about the Wolves during time outside of that time range. While I have absolutely no problem discussing KG's impact on the 2000 - 2003 Wolves, I want to keep this as focused as possible on the 8 year time-window where we have APM results. 8 years is plenty of time, so if you want to argue against a stat's conclusions you should be able to find sufficient support from SOME time within that window.

You say that for KG's defensive impact to have been that large in Minnesota he would have had to have been playing with the worst starting 5 of all time. While earlier in the thread I referenced a post that made that exact argument for the '07 team ( viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1075089 ), more importantly on page 11 of this thread (7th post down) I went into a reasonable amount of detail describing the casts of all of his teams from '04 - '07. And not just names, actually pointing out the strengths and weaknesses of the personnel at that particular point in their careers and how that then played out on the court. As I pointed out, the vast majority of the defenders on that team brought little if anything to the table defensively. The majority of the perimeter players were unable to prevent penetration (often without need for pick), they were unable to disrupt opponents dribble/pass lanes, they were poor on rotations, and they were poor rebounders for their position. The majority of the bigs were unable to maintain post position, were unable to offer help defense, and were also unable to rebound their positions. The one year there was even a mild change in that pattern (in '04 Erv and Madsen were able to maintain their post position...not much else, and Hassell/Spree were able to provide some degree of perimeter resistance) KG was able to take a still subpar defensive cast to among the leagues best. Other than that year, defensively, he WAS leading some of the worst defensive casts in the NBA.

Conclusions: Here is where it's important that we come to some kind of consensus on what the +/- stats are saying. Because subjectively, I can say that the Minnesota casts were awful and the Boston cast has frankly become overrated...and you can say that I'm wrong, that the Minnesota cast wasn't that bad and the Boston defensive cast is "elite". And we essentially stale-mate at that point, because it's opinion against opinion.

But if I point out that the '07 Wolves had an average defensive rating when KG played and an abysmal 122 B-R DRtg in the 6 games he missed, that's not opinion. It's fact. It actually happened. For this particular data point you might argue that the sample size is too small for definite conclusions, and I'd even agree, but it is still an evidence point that actually happened.

And if I then point out that from KG's arrival in Boston in '07 until the present he has played in 268 games and missed 60 (large sample sizes each way), and that when KG has played with Rondo/Ray/Pierce/Perkins the unit's real defensive rating is a sparkling 97.3 but when that same 4 guys have played with any other big man their real defensive rating is an awful 112.1...again, this is fact. It's not my opinion. And here we're talking huge sample sizes, so there's no ambiguity.

And these are just snapshots of the data that a multi-year APM calculation measures. The job of APM is to note the differences in circumstances, and what happens in those circumstances, and over multiple years to quantify the trends. And as Doc MJ has pointed out, there are now THREE mutli-year APM calculations, spanning different sets of years, with many different KG supporting casts, calculated by different analysts, that all agree unanimously that Garnett has been having the largest defensive impact in the NBA over the last 8 years by a clear margin.

Again, my life's mission isn't to convince you that APM is perfect, or that you should even rely on it. But in this example it just seems abundantly clear. We have a player that already was one of the most decorated defensive players of the last 8 years in terms of accolades. We have a very reasonable subjective argument that he really was that good and his teammates really were that bad. Then, if you look in-depth quantitatively it is clear that his defensive impact was massive even if you try to avoid APM. Then, APM just further confirms it. If you disagree with all of that evidence, you really have to bring more to the table from within that 8-year time window than just "he can't have been that good, because if he was he'd have been as good as Larry Bird or David Robinson". That's not a counter-argument. And if that's the best one that you've got, maybe it should make you reconsider a bit where KG might deserve to slot in your personal rankings.
Creator of the Hoops Lab: tinyurl.com/mpo2brj
Contributor to NylonCalculusDOTcom
Contributor to TYTSports: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTbFEVCpx9shKEsZl7FcRHzpGO1dPoimk
Follow on Twitter: @ProfessorDrz
User avatar
Kumar
Junior
Posts: 480
And1: 197
Joined: May 03, 2011
 

Re: Does Dirk with title surpass KG 

Post#185 » by Kumar » Thu May 26, 2011 3:06 pm

WhateverBro wrote:
richboy wrote:
KG was not an elite offensive player. He was a good offensive player. Comparing KG to Dirk offensively is a joke. Laughable. Should get you banned. KG was a force fed midrange jump shooter. Had a decent post game but nothing amazing.

In KG career only 1 time did he score over 21 ppg per 36. His numbers get inflated by huge minute totals. Most of his career he is barely 20 points per 36. Dirk is playing less minutes and scoring more. He is well above 21 points per 36 almost every year of his career. Since the start of his career the only year he wasn't was the year Dallas decided to let Antoine Walker and Jamison chuck. People don't realize that Dirk only played 34 minutes during the year. If he had played Kevin Durant minutes he would have been battling for a scoring title.

Dirk >>> KG on offense. You want to say he made it up on defense that is fine. The reason why KG gets overrated on these boards is because somehow people think he is elite offensively. Somehow he is better than Dwight Howard on defense.


You obviously missed KG's prime. There is no doubt in my mind he was an elite offensive player in his prime. You have to factor what he did on the defensive end and his rebounding when you think about his offensive game. He was consistently over 20 ppg for 10 years with the wolves, together with 5+ assists, I don't understand how that isn't elite offensive production. No, he was never a volume scorer but his offensive impact was huge for the Timberwolves. And no, his postgame wasn't, or isn't decent, he has an excellent post game with a variety of moves, it's just that he doesn't use it nearly enough to be called a post scorer. That's a diferent story though.


If that's not elite, I don't know what is...
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,153
And1: 20,203
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

Re: Does Dirk with title surpass KG 

Post#186 » by NO-KG-AI » Thu May 26, 2011 3:43 pm

My thing is really though, Dirk doesn't hurt you defensively, you can make a good defensive team with Dirk in the lineup, and he's a strong enough rebounder to not hurt you there either, but he's an offensive weapon, that's what you would take him for.

But how many perimeter players would you choose Dirk over? Do you trust Dirk to outscore premier wing players on a consistent basis every night? I think he's the closest big to matching a wing in terms of creating shots from anywhere, and late game situations, but I still don't think he would match even Dwyane Wade, who I wouldn't put in the top tier of offensive players all time.

Now KG will never match those guys either, but that's now what you'd be relying on when you build around him.

Even if you break them down in the all time sense, to me, KG's defense is ranked higher in comparison to league history than Dirk's offense is, and KG's offense is magnitudes higher than Dirk's defense ranks, and he's the much better rebounder.

I know I can build an elite offense around KG as the best offensive player, and I know I can build an all time great defense around KG, and I know he can lead the league in rebounding. I know I can build an all time great offense around Dirk.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
colts18
Head Coach
Posts: 7,434
And1: 3,255
Joined: Jun 29, 2009

Re: Does Dirk with title surpass KG 

Post#187 » by colts18 » Thu May 26, 2011 3:51 pm

With Boston, KG is 194-74 (.724) when he plays and 40-20 (.667) when he doesn't and 7-4 this year without him (9-2 in their championship season). That isn't a great impact. Compare that to the Mavs being 2-7 this year without Dirk.
User avatar
Rapcity_11
RealGM
Posts: 24,803
And1: 9,694
Joined: Jul 26, 2006
     

Re: Does Dirk with title surpass KG 

Post#188 » by Rapcity_11 » Thu May 26, 2011 3:58 pm

colts18 wrote:With Boston, KG is 194-74 (.724) when he plays and 40-20 (.667) when he doesn't and 7-4 this year without him (9-2 in their championship season). That isn't a great impact. Compare that to the Mavs being 2-7 this year without Dirk.


You can't possibly believe that means a whole lot. Like seriously, think it through...
colts18
Head Coach
Posts: 7,434
And1: 3,255
Joined: Jun 29, 2009

Re: Does Dirk with title surpass KG 

Post#189 » by colts18 » Thu May 26, 2011 4:04 pm

Rapcity_11 wrote:
colts18 wrote:With Boston, KG is 194-74 (.724) when he plays and 40-20 (.667) when he doesn't and 7-4 this year without him (9-2 in their championship season). That isn't a great impact. Compare that to the Mavs being 2-7 this year without Dirk.


You can't possibly believe that means a whole lot. Like seriously, think it through...
Someone here said that he carried an average Boston Cast. Obviously they are doing something right if they are winning without KG.
User avatar
Rapcity_11
RealGM
Posts: 24,803
And1: 9,694
Joined: Jul 26, 2006
     

Re: Does Dirk with title surpass KG 

Post#190 » by Rapcity_11 » Thu May 26, 2011 4:09 pm

colts18 wrote:
Rapcity_11 wrote:
colts18 wrote:With Boston, KG is 194-74 (.724) when he plays and 40-20 (.667) when he doesn't and 7-4 this year without him (9-2 in their championship season). That isn't a great impact. Compare that to the Mavs being 2-7 this year without Dirk.


You can't possibly believe that means a whole lot. Like seriously, think it through...
Someone here said that he carried an average Boston Cast. Obviously they are doing something right if they are winning without KG.


Defensively yes, he is carrying them. The numbers support this.

But, it's still a team of all-stars who are quite capable of winning RS games on their own. Plus, we're talking about post-prime KG anyways and comparing him to prime Dirk. As well, Boston has guys who can easily increase their roles whereas the Mavs are completely screwed without Dirk offensively based on the make-up of their roster. Kind of like how Miami can still win RS games with Lebron out of the lineup by upping the usage of Wade of Bosh.
User avatar
Sun Scorched
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,736
And1: 280
Joined: Aug 01, 2007
   

Re: Does Dirk with title surpass KG 

Post#191 » by Sun Scorched » Thu May 26, 2011 4:17 pm

Dirk with a average defensive C > Garnett with an average offensive C
Image
On Steve Nash:
G35 wrote:He may run a great offense but I wouldn't choose him over Amare to start a team.
Chris435
Starter
Posts: 2,469
And1: 58
Joined: Feb 24, 2008
 

Re: Does Dirk with title surpass KG 

Post#192 » by Chris435 » Thu May 26, 2011 4:25 pm

I could see the arguments over Garnett if we are talking about Dirk this year. Dirk has been something special this season.

I'd probably still pick KG though.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,585
And1: 22,554
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Does Dirk with title surpass KG 

Post#193 » by Doctor MJ » Thu May 26, 2011 5:45 pm

drza wrote:KG sat out 6 games in the 2006-07 season. During those 6 absences, the Wolves gave up 117.5 points/game on 51% shooting from the field. I point this out here not as another argument for how bad the cast was (though seriously, look at those numbers again), but instead because those 6 games were SO bad that they actually skewed the overall results for the year. After spending some time navigating the complex way B-R calculates team defensive rating, I was able to quantify just how much those 6 games changed things:

overall season: Wolves DRtg = 107.9 (21st in NBA)
6 games w/o KG: Wolves DRTG = 121.6 (on pace for worst in NBA by FAR)
76 games w/ KG: Wolves DRTG = 106.5 (tied for 14th in NBA)


Holy crap. :o
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
User avatar
Jase
RealGM
Posts: 13,051
And1: 158
Joined: Aug 01, 2008
Location: Grand Rapids, MI.

Re: Does Dirk with title surpass KG 

Post#194 » by Jase » Thu May 26, 2011 5:53 pm

nonemus wrote:
An Unbiased Fan wrote:I already have Dirk ahead of KG.


Can we create a page just for ridiculous AUF posts?


Lemme guess: It's ridiculous becuase you don't agree with it, thus making it wrong...

Am I right?
"A winner listens. A loser just waits until it's their turn to talk."
JNelson43
Analyst
Posts: 3,389
And1: 76
Joined: Dec 10, 2010

Re: Does Dirk with title surpass KG 

Post#195 » by JNelson43 » Thu May 26, 2011 9:49 pm

Not a major point, but there are a couple of reasons why Howard doesn't draw charges, and I don't think it has to do with bbiq.

First, the same reason he doesn't get flagrants called in his favor- because he's so big and athletic. People can fly into him or elbow him, he's not going to fall over or even budge if it's a little guy. In that case it's tough to call a charge.

Secondly, people don't seem to drive straight at Dwight Howard. I vaguely remember a stat brought up a couple years ago (I should try to find it) that showed that even Lebron spent less time driving the ball with Howard in the post. I'm not big on blocks in general, but Howard would average more blocks if players didn't shoot crazy floaters over him specifically to avoid the block... even though he's never averaged 3 blocks in a season, NBA players clearly think that he's very capable of blocking their shots and overall I see far more altered shots than I do shots actually blocked.

Reading the posts more thoroughly, I may have to change my position. I'm not a fan of +/- at all, but it and other stats certainly tell a story. I'm still undecided on the larger question. I guess my answer is that a championship alone wouldn't put Dirk ahead of KG, but Dirk potentially has several good years left. If he plays like he is now for a few years, he has the potential to go down as better than KG.
ElGee
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,041
And1: 1,207
Joined: Mar 08, 2010
Contact:

Re: Does Dirk with title surpass KG 

Post#196 » by ElGee » Fri May 27, 2011 4:39 am

Sun Scorched wrote:Dirk with a average defensive C > Garnett with an average offensive C


Wait, can you elaborate on this?

Seems to me that Dirk + average defensive center = average defensive team at best (so even with a league-best offense there is a ceiling on the team, ala Mavs of the early decade).

But KG with an average offensive C could still be an elite offensive team (and an elite defensive team!).
Check out and discuss my book, now on Kindle! http://www.backpicks.com/thinking-basketball/
colts18
Head Coach
Posts: 7,434
And1: 3,255
Joined: Jun 29, 2009

Re: Does Dirk with title surpass KG 

Post#197 » by colts18 » Fri May 27, 2011 6:31 pm

ElGee wrote:
Sun Scorched wrote:Dirk with a average defensive C > Garnett with an average offensive C


Wait, can you elaborate on this?

Seems to me that Dirk + average defensive center = average defensive team at best (so even with a league-best offense there is a ceiling on the team, ala Mavs of the early decade).

But KG with an average offensive C could still be an elite offensive team (and an elite defensive team!).

Not really. In 03, KG had Rasho who scored 11.2 PPG on 53 FG% but only had 51 wins and a 1st round exit that year. In 06, KG had Mark Blount had 10.2 PPG on 51 FG% but won 33 games. Then in the next season Blount gave KG 12.3 PPG on 51 FG% in a 32 win season. Those are about what the average NBA center gives you
richboy
RealGM
Posts: 25,424
And1: 2,487
Joined: Sep 01, 2003

Re: Does Dirk with title surpass KG 

Post#198 » by richboy » Fri May 27, 2011 6:36 pm

rrravenred wrote:
richboy wrote:Just to note the Magic don't really believe in keeping block shots in bounds. To often they found the block shot would go back to the offense and the defense would be out of position. Just like an offensive rebound. Leading to a wide open shot. They rather you have to inbound the ball again against a set defense.


This is my point. Bogut blocks to advantage where his team gets the ball back. You can argue that it's a "scrappy bucks team fighting for every loose ball" if you like, but I'd respectfully disagree. It's a stat that (I feel) gets backed up by the eye test.

richboy wrote:In terms of Howard vs Bogut. I'm sure there is some out there that have that opinion. Problem is these two get to play against each other. That is why I don't see many Buck fans making that claim. Bogut has had a tough time even scoring on Dwight Howard. Dwight is doing fine against Bogut. Bogut gets his rebounds nearly doubled. Can't block many shots since he busy with Dwight. Career wise scores 7 points per game against Dwight. With like 8 games in single digits. Many games shooting in the 20% range. Career wise 42% against Dwight.


With respect, head to head is a freaking awful way of measuring overall defensive impact on a team against all opponents. Dwight has, however, definitely had Bogie's number over the years(averaging 18/14 at 57% from the field).

Fifteen or so games doesn't disqualify the 380-odd other games during his career.

richboy wrote:I actually love Bogut. Reality is only thing Bogut does better than Dwight is pass the ball. We talked about Gortat before. IMO Gortat as a starter is going to be pretty much Andrew Bogut.


I think if someone suggest that Bogut is as good as Dwight Howard defensively thats going to be part of the case. There no question if Bogut was doing a strong defensive job against Dwight it would be used against him. Dwight misses one game against the Bucks and Bogut goes for 31. Thats a one game sample. In the other 15 games he could barely score. In most of them not even getting to double digits. In some of them not even get over 5 points.

I understand your point with the blocks. Its irrelevant though because the Magic don't believe in keeping block shots in bounds. They rather it go out of bounds because they feel a block shot that doesn't go out of bounds actually hurts the defense if they don't get it back.
"Talent is God-given. Be humble. Fame is man-given. Be grateful. Conceit is self-given. Be careful." John Wooden
User avatar
Rapcity_11
RealGM
Posts: 24,803
And1: 9,694
Joined: Jul 26, 2006
     

Re: Does Dirk with title surpass KG 

Post#199 » by Rapcity_11 » Fri May 27, 2011 6:56 pm

Do you have proof of that Magic strategy? I've never heard about it before and it's pretty freakin stupid considering how often the defensive team recovers blocked shots.

And using Dwight vs. Bogut head to head matchups is pretty irrelevant considering how much better Dwight is offensively...
richboy
RealGM
Posts: 25,424
And1: 2,487
Joined: Sep 01, 2003

Re: Does Dirk with title surpass KG 

Post#200 » by richboy » Fri May 27, 2011 7:29 pm

ElGee wrote:
Sun Scorched wrote:Dirk with a average defensive C > Garnett with an average offensive C


Wait, can you elaborate on this?

Seems to me that Dirk + average defensive center = average defensive team at best (so even with a league-best offense there is a ceiling on the team, ala Mavs of the early decade).

But KG with an average offensive C could still be an elite offensive team (and an elite defensive team!).


Duncan with Rasho = one of the greatest defensive teams of all-time.
KG with Rasho = mediocre defense

That was a proven reality.

Chris435 wrote:I could see the arguments over Garnett if we are talking about Dirk this year. Dirk has been something special this season.

I'd probably still pick KG though.


Dirk is still playing. Lets look back. Nobody had Hakeem even close to a top 10 player all-time till late in his career. It was two championship pushes that raised him. If Patrick Ewing had one those two titles history would have been drastically different.

You obviously missed KG's prime. There is no doubt in my mind he was an elite offensive player in his prime. You have to factor what he did on the defensive end and his rebounding when you think about his offensive game. He was consistently over 20 ppg for 10 years with the wolves, together with 5+ assists, I don't understand how that isn't elite offensive production. No, he was never a volume scorer but his offensive impact was huge for the Timberwolves. And no, his postgame wasn't, or isn't decent, he has an excellent post game with a variety of moves, it's just that he doesn't use it nearly enough to be called a post scorer. That's a diferent story though.


Its as much elite as calling Joe Johnson Elite. As calling Scottie Pippen elite. In my book Elite means your at the top. Best of the best. I can compare Dirk to any elite level scorer of his era. Right now I can make a case he still a better offensive player than Kevin Durant. KG has never been in that class.

My thing is really though, Dirk doesn't hurt you defensively, you can make a good defensive team with Dirk in the lineup, and he's a strong enough rebounder to not hurt you there either, but he's an offensive weapon, that's what you would take him for.

But how many perimeter players would you choose Dirk over? Do you trust Dirk to outscore premier wing players on a consistent basis every night? I think he's the closest big to matching a wing in terms of creating shots from anywhere, and late game situations, but I still don't think he would match even Dwyane Wade, who I wouldn't put in the top tier of offensive players all time.

Now KG will never match those guys either, but that's now what you'd be relying on when you build around him.

Even if you break them down in the all time sense, to me, KG's defense is ranked higher in comparison to league history than Dirk's offense is, and KG's offense is magnitudes higher than Dirk's defense ranks, and he's the much better rebounder.

I know I can build an elite offense around KG as the best offensive player, and I know I can build an all time great defense around KG, and I know he can lead the league in rebounding. I know I can build an all time great offense around Dirk.


You know you can build an all-time defense around KG or he can be part of it. If someone said right now I can build an all-time great defense around Joakim Noah what would you say. My thoughts is well Joakim is no question an amazing defender but unless you surround him with other great defenders his impact will be mute.

IMO KG is a lot more like Joakim Noah than Tim Duncan or Dwight Howard. Matter of fact Noah and KG are relatively identical except KG is a much better shooter. As great as they might be defensively. I'm not taking them over superior offensive players unless I know they are the anchor.

I think I said why its not elite. What is your definition of elite. My definition is the best of the best. Joe Johnson consistently puts up 20 and 5. Do you consider him elite. If you do then me and your definition of elite is very different. I'm talking about has KG even been a top 5 offensive player in this league.

Like I said most years he barely 20 points per game scorer per 36. Most years he is 20 and 5 in the first 36 minutes. Those are really good numbers. He plays heavy minutes though so his numbers get skewed overall. In some years Duncan is putting up comparable numbers playing a lot less minutes.

IMO you can't just build an elite offensive with KG. You might put up some nice stats. When the playoffs come around your going to be looking for offense. There is a reason why Minnesota best year they added 2 offensive players. Even though apparently Minnesota had elite offenses for years. When the game was on the line they could start running plays for Sam Cassell.

One thing that drives me crazy. People will constantly bash a players teammates. That is fine to me. At the same time you can't rave about his numbers then. In essence people are saying then he is being force fed the ball because his teammates aren't that good. Does anybody think anymore that Chris Bosh could have been the best offensive player on a championship team. I would say the exact same thing with KG.

You say could he match Dwade like that is a bad thing. Like Dwade is Hot Garbage. Your argument is why Dirk offensive dominance is even beyond his numbers. You have a 7 foot player who can create on the perimeter like a guard. You play against Dwade I put my SG on him and live with the results. I said this earlier in this thread. The first thing you think about when you play the Dallas Mavericks in a playoff series is who is going to guard Dirk. Suddenly you have to do things you haven't done all year. Miami has an elite PF. One of the most mobile athletic PFs in the league. He probably going to be guarded by Lebron James. Have never seen Lebron have to guard Kg.
"Talent is God-given. Be humble. Fame is man-given. Be grateful. Conceit is self-given. Be careful." John Wooden

Return to Player Comparisons