Game 54 | Brewers @ Reds 5/30 6:10 CST

Siefer · Post #1 » by **Siefer** » Mon May 30, 2011 4:03 am

Game 54

Who:

Milwaukee Brewers (29-24)

@

Cincinnati Reds (27-27)

When:

Monday, May 30th at 6:10pm CST

Where:

Great American Ball Park in Cincinnati, OH

TV and Radio:

FSN - Wisconsin
620 WTMJ

Starting Pitchers:

Chris Narveson (2-3, 4.20 ERA)

vs.

Travis Wood (3-3, 5.11 ERA)

Narveson got shelled his last time out, giving up 6 earned over 3.1 innings, but the Brewers still pulled out the W against the Nationals. Before the shellacking, Narveson had strung together 3 straight strong starts of 6 or more innings and 2 or less earned runs. Hopefully he'll return to form against the Reds.

Travis Wood has been rather mediocre so far this season, though he has been better in May than he was in April when he gave up 6+ runs in three outings. His last time out against Philly, he gave up 3 ER over 6 innings, striking out 2 while walking 3.

The Crew just wrapped up a dominant 8-1 homestand with sweeps of the Rockies and Nationals, and a series win against the Giants. Let's keep this thing rolling and figure out how to win a few more games on the road. The Brewers are 21-7 at home, and a miserable 8-17 away from Miller Park. For perspective, if the Brewers were a balmy 12-13 away from home, they'd be tied with the Phillies at 33-20 with the best record in all of baseball.

For Luck:

....and another...

MORE!

...okay, one more...

Go Crew.

Post #2 » by **MickeyDavis** » Mon May 30, 2011 4:13 am

Reds have been bad lately. We need to start winning on the road. I'd like to go AT LEAST 4-3 in Cinci and Miami. It would be big to have Narvy get a win tomorrow with Greinke and Marcum on deck.

Captain Erv · Post #3 » by **Captain Erv** » Mon May 30, 2011 4:29 am

I'll take exercising demons for $600, Alex.

Ill-yasova · Post #4 » by **Ill-yasova** » Mon May 30, 2011 5:01 am

Watching Season 4 of Mad Men right now as I type this. I love me some Christina Hendricks. I could get lost in those peaks and valleys.

trwi7 · Post #5 » by **trwi7** » Mon May 30, 2011 5:12 am

Game is at 6:10, not 7:10.

MikeIsGood · Post #6 » by **MikeIsGood** » Mon May 30, 2011 5:39 am

Her boobs are epic.

EDIT: Are these things real? Jesus...

Balls2TheWalls · Post #7 » by **Balls2TheWalls** » Mon May 30, 2011 6:41 am

She is hot, until you realize she married the mushroom guy from Super Troopers. :-?

Ill-yasova · Post #8 » by **Ill-yasova** » Mon May 30, 2011 7:27 am

Gives all of the goofy guys out there hope. She's like the human version of Jessica Rabbit.

Siefer · Post #9 » by **Siefer** » Mon May 30, 2011 9:13 am

The Esquire spread that she did last year is mouthwatering. :droop:

http://www.esquire.com/women/women-issue/christina-hendricks-sexy-0510

j_hilge444 · Post #10 » by **j_hilge444** » Mon May 30, 2011 3:43 pm

This is hot?

She is all smoke and mirrors.

Turk Nowitzki · Post #11 » by **Turk Nowitzki** » Mon May 30, 2011 4:02 pm

Huge chance to put some distance between us and the Reds and focus on catching the Cardinals. Great American is one of my least favorite ballparks, hopefully we can exorcise those early season demons.

Kerb Hohl · Post #12 » by **Kerb Hohl** » Mon May 30, 2011 4:44 pm

We get to miss Josh Johnson and now it looks like Hanley (not like he's done much this year) may miss our series.

Post #13 » by **MickeyDavis** » Mon May 30, 2011 5:29 pm

Reds have lost 10/12 but they do seem to have our number. Need to take 2/3

Kerb Hohl · Post #14 » by **Kerb Hohl** » Mon May 30, 2011 5:50 pm

I don't know if I've ever seen a team mirror the Brewers so much from our 2007-2008 rise.

Unbelievable hitting prospects come up. Seemingly bright future. Pitching catastrophically falls apart.

jakecronus8 · Post #15 » by **jakecronus8** » Mon May 30, 2011 6:01 pm

j_hilge444 wrote:This is hot?

She is all smoke and mirrors.

I agree. Misdirection is her best friend. Hey everyone, check out my red hair and giant cans, just don't look at my chub and face. You can find a million girls like her any Friday night on water st. Cmon guys. Were better than this. She is however a better redhead than Emma stone. Between the man voice and gangly body, I don't understand why anyone thinks she is hot.

Kerb Hohl · Post #16 » by **Kerb Hohl** » Mon May 30, 2011 6:23 pm

I'll get flamed by the fans of her for agreeing. This is the classic case of falling in love with her as an actress because you see her dolled up on the screen all the time. I'm not one of those guys that believes a girl has to be a model-esque tall blonde to be attractive, and I have barely seen any of Mad Men, but I just don't see it.

Ayt · Post #17 » by **Ayt** » Mon May 30, 2011 7:48 pm

What is wrong with this face?

Her arms look bigger in that bad picture of her than they normally look, so I'm guessing it was taken during the offseason and she'd put on some weight. With a figure like hers, that is probably very easy to do.

El Duderino · Post #18 » by **El Duderino** » Mon May 30, 2011 7:56 pm

GrendonJennings wrote:I'll get flamed by the fans of her for agreeing. This is the classic case of falling in love with her as an actress because you see her dolled up on the screen all the time. I'm not one of those guys that believes a girl has to be a model-esque tall blonde to be attractive, and I have barely seen any of Mad Men, but I just don't see it.

That candid picture of her reminds me a bit of my daughters mother.

I dated my kids mother from ages 19-21 and she was a DD with a still pretty thin body. Her mom though also had huge boobs, but after popping out two kids and some age by being in her 40's, she had gained quite a bit of weight.

Well, Kim would hint to me that we should get married and some may say this is being shallow, but i was worried that her mom and mom's sister both had huge boobs also, but were now were much heavier. We split up for other reasons, mainly her becoming a crab asss, but now she must have gained 40-50 pounds since i had dated her.

Some women with bodies like a Christina Hendricks or my kids mother can keep that fabulous figure for a long time of huge boobs while still being relatively thin, but in most cases, it's just to hard for them to do and eventually they put on quite a bit of weight.

Siefer · Post #19 » by **Siefer** » Mon May 30, 2011 8:25 pm

GrendonJennings wrote:I'll get flamed by the fans of her for agreeing. This is the classic case of falling in love with her as an actress because you see her dolled up on the screen all the time. I'm not one of those guys that believes a girl has to be a model-esque tall blonde to be attractive, and I have barely seen any of Mad Men, but I just don't see it.

I've never seen a minute of Mad Men; I simply think the woman is beautiful. She's certainly a big girl, but I think that's part of her charm. She's got a beautiful face, an enormous rack, and she rocks her curves like very few in this Hollywood generation. Those bathing suit pictures of her don't really bother me. She's of a body type that most likely gains weight rather easily, and I honestly think she still looks good. I'm taken with curvy girls, though.

Even not dolled up for the camera, she still looks rockin'. I really don't think it's smoke and mirrors.

RiotPunch · Post #20 » by **RiotPunch** » Mon May 30, 2011 8:36 pm

Ill-yasova wrote:Watching Season 4 of Mad Men right now as I type this. I love me some Christina Hendricks. I could get lost in those peaks and valleys.

She's a sucker for the D.E.N.N.I.S. System.