Skip Bayless: Top 5 PGs of All Time / Your top 10 PGs /Kidd?

ecnirp · Post #1 » by **ecnirp** » Tue May 31, 2011 3:54 pm

1. Magic
2. JKidd
3. Steve Nash

4. Oscar Robertson
5. John Stockton

No Thomas...

AWalkerREMIX · Post #2 » by **AWalkerREMIX** » Tue May 31, 2011 3:59 pm

Hmmmm....

1. Magic
2. Stockton
3. Kidd
4. Nash
5. Robertson

Jugs · Post #3 » by **Jugs** » Tue May 31, 2011 4:00 pm

this guy is on crack

Post #4 » by **DuckIII** » Tue May 31, 2011 4:05 pm

ecnirp wrote:1. Magic
2. JKidd
3. Steve Nash
4. Oscar Robertson
5. John Stockton

No Thomas...

Its almost like he did that on purpose to create controversy.

K1NG · Post #5 » by **K1NG** » Tue May 31, 2011 4:07 pm

AWalkerREMIX wrote:Hmmmm....

1. Magic
2. Stockton
3. Kidd
4. Nash
5. Robertson

This

omerome · Post #6 » by **omerome** » Tue May 31, 2011 4:07 pm

DuckIII wrote:
ecnirp wrote:1. Magic
2. JKidd
3. Steve Nash
4. Oscar Robertson
5. John Stockton

No Thomas...

Its almost like he did that on purpose to create controversy.

If he says what we all thought he should say, he would be irrelevant.

He needs to get a response from a blatant fail of a list so he can open that big mouth of his and stick his foot in there.

Happyfoosball · Post #7 » by **Happyfoosball** » Tue May 31, 2011 4:14 pm

Magic and Oscar were the best. Hands down. They both won titles with the same big too.

SUN · Post #8 » by **SUN** » Tue May 31, 2011 4:17 pm

I always thought Big O was underrated.

Pharmcat · Post #9 » by **Pharmcat** » Tue May 31, 2011 4:18 pm

DuckIII wrote:
ecnirp wrote:1. Magic
2. JKidd
3. Steve Nash
4. Oscar Robertson
5. John Stockton

No Thomas...

Its almost like he did that on purpose to create controversy.

thats what he does, thats his goal

he is the most successful troll ever, he has made a great business out of it

just look at how many threads get started in rgm cuz of what he says

daoneandonly · Post #10 » by **daoneandonly** » Tue May 31, 2011 4:18 pm

1. Magic
2. Stockton
3. Oscar
4. Thomas
5. Kidd

Mundo · Post #11 » by **Mundo** » Tue May 31, 2011 4:19 pm

Stockton > Magic at being a point guard.

The only reason magic won is because he had Kareem and others. I don't think he could ever win one on his own. In addition, one of the reason that magic gets more hype is because he is so f***ing annoying. He's a sociopath who is always talking about himself or trying to put himself out there. John Stockton is just a mild mannered reserved individual who doesn't care for fame. Also, Jkidd over Stockton gtfo. Robertson passing skills were good for his era but they don't match stocktons.

Post #12 » by **CellarDoor** » Tue May 31, 2011 4:20 pm

Kidd is a little high, and IT should be on there, but really I don't find that list to be all that egregious. Especially considering how moronic Skippers usually is.

celticfan42487 · Post #13 » by **celticfan42487** » Tue May 31, 2011 4:21 pm

I know we're all too young to remember but Bob Cousy was pretty good at PG. MVP, 6 time champion, 5 championships in a row, 13 time all star, 10 time first team (2 time second team), and played for 20 years showing his longevity.

Post #14 » by **NyCeEvO** » Tue May 31, 2011 4:24 pm

It's Skip Bayless. Why would you expect anything great to come from him?

Gongxi · Post #15 » by **Gongxi** » Tue May 31, 2011 4:25 pm

Mundo wrote:Stockton > Magic at being a point guard.

The only reason magic won is because he had Kareem and others. I don't think he could ever win one on his own. In addition, one of the reason that magic gets more hype is because he is so f***ing annoying. He's a sociopath who is always talking about himself or trying to put himself out there. John Stockton is just a mild mannered reserved individual who doesn't care for fame. Also, Jkidd over Stockton gtfo. Robertson passing skills were good for his era but they don't match stocktons.

Meh. Stockton's prime sucked compared to the other guys you'd list, so that should count for something.

BJGOAT3 · Post #16 » by **BJGOAT3** » Tue May 31, 2011 4:28 pm

He should have had thomas instead of Kidd or Nash. Nash has more individual acollades but Kidd has always impressed me more as a player. But I guess you gotta go with Nash so: Magic-Big O-Thomas-Stockton-Nash

Post #17 » by **DuckIII** » Tue May 31, 2011 4:33 pm

Pharmcat wrote:
DuckIII wrote:
ecnirp wrote:1. Magic
2. JKidd
3. Steve Nash
4. Oscar Robertson
5. John Stockton

No Thomas...

Its almost like he did that on purpose to create controversy.

thats what he does, thats his goal

I was just being sarcastic.

Mundo · Post #18 » by **Mundo** » Tue May 31, 2011 4:35 pm

Gongxi wrote:
Mundo wrote:Stockton > Magic at being a point guard.

The only reason magic won is because he had Kareem and others. I don't think he could ever win one on his own. In addition, one of the reason that magic gets more hype is because he is so f***ing annoying. He's a sociopath who is always talking about himself or trying to put himself out there. John Stockton is just a mild mannered reserved individual who doesn't care for fame. Also, Jkidd over Stockton gtfo. Robertson passing skills were good for his era but they don't match stocktons.

Meh. Stockton's prime sucked compared to the other guys you'd list, so that should count for something.

How'd did it suck? I'm sorry if I have to create an all time team, I would never take magic Jonshon just because he can't space the floor. Really he's 6'8 has a clear height advantage over all his defenders, and yet shoots less than 30% from 3 and averages less than 20 points. Is he really better than stockton? Stockton was always at the point of emphasis, and didn't have a clear physical advantage over his adversaries, yet he average more assists and steals than magic.

My NBA all time starting five
Stockton
Jordan
Lebron
Duncan
Hakeem (No disrespect to Shaq)

_nokturnal · Post #19 » by **_nokturnal** » Tue May 31, 2011 5:02 pm

CellarDoor wrote:Kidd is a little high, and IT should be on there, but really I don't find that list to be all that egregious. Especially considering how moronic Skippers usually is.

Yeah, what's the outrage from?

Gongxi · Post #20 » by **Gongxi** » Tue May 31, 2011 5:03 pm

Okay, but an all-time starting five to create a team can and should be different from the best player at each position. Anyway, Stockton's prime is really not that amazing when compared to other all-time greats. It's so self-evident that I'd really need to hear why it would be considered amazing. All-time assists leader? Yes. All-time steals leader? Yes. But as far as individual seasons? Meh.