Anyone interested in judging the Be the GM Teams?

ZarcMumoff · Post #21 » by **ZarcMumoff** » Tue May 31, 2011 5:06 pm

83SixersRocked, you're in as a judge.

Post #22 » by **tk76** » Tue May 31, 2011 5:30 pm

Derek Bodner will be a judge.

ZarcMumoff · Post #23 » by **ZarcMumoff** » Tue May 31, 2011 5:36 pm

PK5 wrote:Be The GM Judges
1. 51X3RF4N
2. Brian Ward
3. 83SixersRocked
4. Derek Bodner

Post #24 » by **tk76** » Tue May 31, 2011 5:46 pm

My email to Tom Moore did not get through. I'll try and contact him through blogs.

51X3RF4N · Post #25 » by **51X3RF4N** » Tue May 31, 2011 9:08 pm

Wow I'm honored to be on that list. Some impressive names!

76ciology · Post #26 » by **76ciology** » Wed Jun 1, 2011 2:41 am

I don't agree with the point system.

I think that there should be more emphasis on team's chemistry. It should be more than just 5 points. Because it doesn't matter how good or how promising your team is if they don't seem to fit together.

IMO, the point system should be like this..

Contender: 30
Chemistry: 10
Future: 10

Just my two cents.

Post #27 » by **tk76** » Wed Jun 1, 2011 2:41 am

Jordan Sams, who founded and co-runs LibertyBallers.com has also agreed to be a judge.

Post #28 » by **tk76** » Wed Jun 1, 2011 2:43 am

76ciology wrote:I don't agree with the point system.

I think that there should be more emphasis on team's chemistry. It should be more than just 5 points. Because it doesn't matter how good or how promising your team is if they don't seem to fit together.

IMO, the point system should be like this..

Contender: 30
Chemistry: 10
Future: 10

Just my two cents.

I like that to, but it is up to PK5. I know with my team I tried to build a team that is good now and has some young players in place who should be able o step into bigger roles as the older players age. But not everyone is going to build their team the same way.

ZarcMumoff · Post #29 » by **ZarcMumoff** » Wed Jun 1, 2011 2:44 am

76ciology wrote:I don't agree with the point system.

I think that there should be more emphasis on team's chemistry. It should be more than just 5 points. Because it doesn't matter how good or how promising your team is if they don't seem to fit together.

IMO, the point system should be like this..

Contender: 30
Chemistry: 10
Future: 10

Just my two cents.

First off, chemistry goes into being a contender. If the team is filled with a bunch of "ME" players, you aren't going to be getting many points in the contender category.

Chemistry also kind of fits into roster management as well...how your players fit together.

Post #30 » by **tk76** » Wed Jun 1, 2011 2:45 am

PK5, did you see my post above about the additional judge who accepted?

ZarcMumoff · Post #31 » by **ZarcMumoff** » Wed Jun 1, 2011 2:49 am

tk76 wrote:PK5, did you see my post above about the additional judge who accepted?

Yeah, great job! Ferreal...getting some beast as judges.

ZarcMumoff · Post #32 » by **ZarcMumoff** » Wed Jun 1, 2011 2:50 am

PK5 wrote:Be The GM Judges
1. 51X3RF4N
2. Brian Ward
3. 83SixersRocked
4. Derek Bodner
5. Jordan Sams

83SixersRocked · Post #33 » by **83SixersRocked** » Wed Jun 1, 2011 2:52 am

PK5 wrote:83SixersRocked, you're in as a judge.

Thanks, I appreciate it.

ZarcMumoff · Post #34 » by **ZarcMumoff** » Wed Jun 1, 2011 3:48 am

PK5 wrote:Be The GM Judges
1. 51X3RF4N
2. Brian Ward
3. 83SixersRocked
4. Derek Bodner
5. Jordan Sams
6. Tom Moore

Post #35 » by **tk76** » Wed Jun 1, 2011 4:39 am

People are really generous with their time. Including explosioninthesky, who is running the sim.

Imagine if we channeled all of this time and energy into a worthwhile cause

Anyhow, it shows that serous SIxers fans are generally quality people, puts the whole Philly fan stereotype to shame. We need to get back to booing people and throwing batteries at Santa...

Sixerlover · Post #36 » by **Sixerlover** » Wed Jun 1, 2011 5:58 am

tk76 wrote:Imagine if we channeled all of this time and energy into a worthwhile cause

Lets all put together a plan to create a website, then sell it for 2 billion next year, and split the money. Sounds fair.

ZarcMumoff · Post #37 » by **ZarcMumoff** » Wed Jun 1, 2011 9:39 pm

50% would go to me...obviously.

ZarcMumoff · Post #38 » by **ZarcMumoff** » Thu Jun 2, 2011 5:52 pm

One last bump.

Post #39 » by **tk76** » Thu Jun 2, 2011 6:50 pm

I'm planning on sending an email to the judges on Friday outlining the process and timing.

ZarcMumoff · Post #40 » by **ZarcMumoff** » Thu Jun 2, 2011 9:57 pm

tk76 wrote:I'm planning on sending an email to the judges on Friday outlining the process and timing.

Thanks, tk. Really, you've been a major help.