bigsby1 wrote:And Kobe didn't demand a trade after they ever lost? If I remember correctly he demanded a trade twice and we even heard it straight from the horses mouth in the Stephen A. Smith interview. Kobe was "uncoachable" according the Phil Jackson so that is part of the reason Shaq left on bad terms because of their fued. Yes the competition will be weak at center when you have a top 5 center in the history of the game. And what does Kobe have to do with Shaq deserving a statue or not. Absolutely nothing.
John Ireland who has covered the Lakers since Kobe had come to the team broke it down nicely over the last week on his radio show.
He said that the biggest problem with Kobe and Shaq was their completely different mindsets in regards to what they should have done after they were eliminated by San Antonio in 2003. Kobe wanted the team to work their asses off in the offseason and get better, pleading with Shaq to work extra hard in the offseason. Shaq on the other hand wanted them to chill, do the same thing they had done the last 3 years. Trying to reassure him by saying that they'll be back. Kobe thought the team had to improve in order to get back to form, while Shaq thought they'd be alright and it was just a hiccup.
Butting heads over this led to Kobe telling the front office to either get Shaq in line and get him to work, or to choose between the two of them.
As far as dominance, Shaq was a dominant force in the league at that time, but to point out his Finals MVPs isn't the best way to make a case for him. Considering he went up against some scrub big men in those series (save for Mutombo in '01), it's natural he'd dominate the competition.
Fact is, the way Shaq left the organization and all the shots he took at the team won't be forgotten. He'll get his jersey retired, but no way in hell he gets a statue. He simply doesn't deserve it.