Trade question
Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
Trade question
-
- Senior
- Posts: 529
- And1: 0
- Joined: Apr 12, 2011
Trade question
Would you guys do this
Jameer Nelson/brandon bass/Ryan Anderson/Daniel orton for Steve nash and robin Lopez?
Jameer Nelson/brandon bass/Ryan Anderson/Daniel orton for Steve nash and robin Lopez?
Re: Trade question
- Kerrsed
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 29,876
- And1: 16,578
- Joined: Mar 31, 2009
- Location: Land of the Internet Memes
- Contact:
-
Re: Trade question
jjtreyball wrote:Would you guys do this
Jameer Nelson/brandon bass/Ryan Anderson/Daniel orton for Steve nash and robin Lopez?
Nelson/Bass/Anderson/Orton/Future1st for Nash/Lopez/Warrick.
Its #DUMPSTERFIRE SEASON! #TeamTRAINWRECK -KERRSED- The Mod, The Myth, The Legend


Re: Trade question
- TASTIC
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 18,411
- And1: 2,425
- Joined: May 17, 2004
- Location: New Zealand
-
Re: Trade question
^Yeah if Nash is moved then a bad contract (chill or Warrick) needs to go along for the ride...
Re: Trade question
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,085
- And1: 1,576
- Joined: Dec 24, 2003
- Location: The O
-
Re: Trade question
TASTIC wrote:^Yeah if Nash is moved then a bad contract (chill or Warrick) needs to go along for the ride...
PG Nash, C Lopez and PF Warrick
for
PG Nelson, PF Bass, C Orton and use the Gortat trade exption on Warrick's contract
That would work?
A smart coach once said, "Potential just means you're not good enough yet." Playing on potential is like living on air: It's essential, but if thats all you have, you're eventually going to starve.
Twitter: @CleonONE IG: @usaidwhatnah
Twitter: @CleonONE IG: @usaidwhatnah
Re: Trade question
- Kerrsed
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 29,876
- And1: 16,578
- Joined: Mar 31, 2009
- Location: Land of the Internet Memes
- Contact:
-
Re: Trade question
Neon1 wrote:TASTIC wrote:^Yeah if Nash is moved then a bad contract (chill or Warrick) needs to go along for the ride...
PG Nash, C Lopez and PF Warrick
for
PG Nelson, PF Bass, C Orton and use the Gortat trade exption on Warrick's contract
That would work?
Throw in a future 1st (if the trade happens post draft, a 2012 pick can be added). Then we are golden!
Its #DUMPSTERFIRE SEASON! #TeamTRAINWRECK -KERRSED- The Mod, The Myth, The Legend


Re: Trade question
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,026
- And1: 1,709
- Joined: Jan 11, 2005
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
- Contact:
-
Re: Trade question
Nelson/ Brooks/ Dowdell
Dudley/ Burks
Childress/ Pietrus
Frye/ Bass/ Lawal
Gortat/ Orton/ Siler
It's not the worst trade Nash scenario I've seen, value seems pretty fair if that was the direction we wanted to go in.
I almost prefer having Hak over Bass in this instance because I think Lawal is more in the rugged Bass/ Amundson type of mold and while Bass is clearly the superior player, I like having the option of a stretch 4 (frye), an athletic 4 (Warrick) or a banger 4 (Lawal).
Bass is a guy that commands minutes, while our current 3 guys each only may play limited minutes (between 10-24 mins each) at the 4 spot. Channing is the only one that commands minutes and he can also split time at the 5.
Having 3 different 'types' of PF would allow us to mix and match based on match ups. I think this is important for a team lacking true star talent, as we aren't good enough to impose our style on anyone anymore. We have to be more reactive to teams now, as we can't really adopt the whole "this is what we are going to do, it's up to you to beat us" mentality.
Anyway that's just my take. It's all contingent on coaching rotations etc anyway so not even sure Gentry would be sharp enough to handle such a reactive rotation.
Also from a magic perspective, do they really want to have Nash and Turk together? Perhaps they would cut him under the amnesty clause.
Dudley/ Burks
Childress/ Pietrus
Frye/ Bass/ Lawal
Gortat/ Orton/ Siler
It's not the worst trade Nash scenario I've seen, value seems pretty fair if that was the direction we wanted to go in.
I almost prefer having Hak over Bass in this instance because I think Lawal is more in the rugged Bass/ Amundson type of mold and while Bass is clearly the superior player, I like having the option of a stretch 4 (frye), an athletic 4 (Warrick) or a banger 4 (Lawal).
Bass is a guy that commands minutes, while our current 3 guys each only may play limited minutes (between 10-24 mins each) at the 4 spot. Channing is the only one that commands minutes and he can also split time at the 5.
Having 3 different 'types' of PF would allow us to mix and match based on match ups. I think this is important for a team lacking true star talent, as we aren't good enough to impose our style on anyone anymore. We have to be more reactive to teams now, as we can't really adopt the whole "this is what we are going to do, it's up to you to beat us" mentality.
Anyway that's just my take. It's all contingent on coaching rotations etc anyway so not even sure Gentry would be sharp enough to handle such a reactive rotation.
Also from a magic perspective, do they really want to have Nash and Turk together? Perhaps they would cut him under the amnesty clause.
Re: Trade question
- Nolimit1211
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,174
- And1: 17
- Joined: Feb 24, 2008
- Location: Flawda!
Re: Trade question
What's the news on Nash's situation in PHX locally? is he attainable? Or do they want him there to retire?
Vince Carter vs. Brandon Roy: A healthy guy who likes to pretend he's injured against an injured guy pretending to be healthy. - John Hollinger
Re: Trade question
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,026
- And1: 1,709
- Joined: Jan 11, 2005
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
- Contact:
-
Re: Trade question
The spiel that the front office is giving is that they are not looking to deal Nash and that they would like him to retire a Sun. Makes sense for them, as he is the face of the franchise and he puts asses in seats. His value to PHX is arguably more than his value to any other team.
I think it would have to be a really good deal to get him out of PHX.
I think it would have to be a really good deal to get him out of PHX.
Re: Trade question
- mikefly3113
- Sophomore
- Posts: 194
- And1: 56
- Joined: Dec 16, 2009
- Location: the valley
-
Re: Trade question
yes, its probably the best that we could get right now. I'd like to give up that hak or childress contract and maybe get a pick but beggers can't be choosers.
I like Draft Picks/Cap Space, long walks on the beach, and short youtube clips.
VIVA LA STOOL
VIVA LA STOOL
Re: Trade question
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,725
- And1: 1,629
- Joined: Jun 02, 2006
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Re: Trade question
Nash is going nowhere. He's an expiring after this next season anyway. Obviously we'll keep him, and only entertain offers if we're not "in it" by the trade deadline, and even then I'm sure he'll expire or re-sign with us anyway.
Re: Trade question
- WTFsunsFTW
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,700
- And1: 113
- Joined: Aug 04, 2007
-
Re: Trade question
He will be traded this summer, anyone who disagrees is just setting themselves up for disappointment.
Re: Trade question
-
- Junior
- Posts: 359
- And1: 1
- Joined: May 28, 2010
Re: Trade question
WTFsunsFTW wrote:He will be traded this summer, anyone who disagrees is just setting themselves up for disappointment.
I want to trade Nash too, but no way in hell that happens.
Re: Trade question
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,002
- And1: 9
- Joined: Jul 03, 2009
- Location: Los Angeles
-
Re: Trade question
Nolimit1211 wrote:What's the news on Nash's situation in PHX locally? is he attainable? Or do they want him there to retire?
Some want him traded, some want to find pieces for one final run. Personally, I want to see him traded for assets, or expiring if he's paired along any of our longer contracts (Warrick and Childress).
But judging from the FO and the owner, this doesn't seem likely. Personally, I'll give that trade a go if a "post current Dwight Howard contract Magic 1st round pick" is offered to us.
Phoenix Suns
San Francisco 49ers
UCLA Bruins
San Francisco 49ers
UCLA Bruins
Re: Trade question
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,727
- And1: 18
- Joined: Mar 13, 2006
- Location: Boston, MA
Re: Trade question
Why trade Nash for a package that isn't that young and makes the Suns a 30-35 win team?
Robert Sarver: "Hey Suns fans, how's my a** taste?"
Re: Trade question
-
- Suns Forum Stat Stuffer
- Posts: 6,761
- And1: 5,479
- Joined: Jun 21, 2009
Re: Trade question
- mybloodisorange
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,157
- And1: 66
- Joined: Jul 17, 2010
- Location: Cloud 9
Re: Trade question
Hey Kerrsed remember when Gortat was traded here and said he was happy that he didnt have to get beat up by Howard every day in practice anymore? If your trade happens imagine what he would do to Lopez!
No glass door anywhere would be safe.
No glass door anywhere would be safe.
Everybody dies but not everybody truly lives.
Re: Trade question
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,178
- And1: 3,609
- Joined: Feb 28, 2010
- Location: Kentucky Suns
- Contact:
-
Re: Trade question
Cash wrote:Why trade Nash for a package that isn't that young and makes the Suns a 30-35 win team?
Hit the nail right on the head.
MrMiyagi wrote:Lob to DA for the win