Image ImageImage Image

Bulls Rumor Thread - Only Bulls!

Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23

BuffaloBull
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,751
And1: 576
Joined: Jan 10, 2008

Re: Bulls Rumor Thread - Only Bulls! 

Post#1141 » by BuffaloBull » Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:09 pm

kyrv wrote:
SuburbanOasis wrote:
kyrv wrote:
In the Bulls system imo the 4 and 5 have much more importance, at least defensively. And having Boozer, they might feel that they need 3 bigs that they *know* defensively can get it done.

Someone mentioned about overrating their players. I would word it differently. Some players who do decent to well in their system, I think they don't appreciate how replaceable they are. Which I guess is saying the same thing.

Now, if they are saying, they can get a SG and keep Taj and Asik, that would be best. I agree with that, but, it's not done yet of course. :)

I'll stress that among the reasons I want to make a move NOW is that I'm an inpatient fan and I'd like to go into the lockout with a starting five. But that's not necessarily how the Bulls think.


I feel like your two last paragraphs are, essentially, the exact opposite of each other. The most likely way to get a good SG and keep Taj/Asik is to wait and go into FA. Making a trade now and going into the lockout with a starting 5 almost definitely means you are losing one of Taj or Asik (to have any kind of talented player at SG at least).

Personally, I think Taj is properly rated. I understand his numbers haven't been huge the past 2 years, but he was essentially a 9/7.5 guy as a rookie playing 27 a game. Those numbers are pretty strong for a rookie who can switch on to anyone and play great team D.

Asik is a scary player to trade because he is so high risk high reward. He probably has a ceiling as a more mobile Gortat, but that is a starting center on most teams.

I just don't see the hurry. If the CBA changes super dramatically then we won't be the only team who needs to make moves. If it doesn't, then we should be in a real good position looking at the available players.


What I meant was, ideally I'd like to have a good SG and keep Taj and Asik - that does not make it doable. So while I would weigh that in and make the move, again they have much more information than I do.

I thought we would see tons of trades but once we found out the NBA actually cautioned teams to wait, well, now I think there may not be a ton of trades. The league also knows more than we do, so I do think doing not much is more a possibility than I did before, just how it played out.

But I won't complain that it's "not exciting enough for me" as one poster opined yesterday. :)


I agree with the bolded. Because of salary and minutes, I think the front office is going to have to choose one of Taj or Omer to be the longterm 3rd big. But I can see a real rationale for delaying that decision to this seasons February trade deadline or the offseason.

Mostly, I see it as the longer you wait, the more information you have to make the best decision. What if Omer comes in with more offensive confidence in his 2nd year? What if Taj really nails that jumpshot form down over the summer? I can't pick definitely between them right now, and the competition between the two could make both of them raise their games, while also providing injury insurance. So I'm loathe to move either one of these guys now unless some other team gives you exactly what you want.

Which brings me to the other side of the equation and that is I don't know how much dealing is going on right now. Due to the weak draft and the CBA negotiations, most teams seem to be in a holding pattern: usually one or two deals have leaked out by now, but this year, nothing. It's hard to know what the smart move is when you don't know what the playing field looks like going forward.
m_willis01
Banned User
Posts: 4,163
And1: 0
Joined: May 11, 2007

Re: Bulls Rumor Thread - Only Bulls! 

Post#1142 » by m_willis01 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:09 pm

SimonFish wrote:
m_willis01 wrote:does this make orlando worse or better?

lol worse. Dwight definitely gonna leave if they really do the deal.


Yeah I hope Orlando pulls that off...

Otis Smith is doing his best Isiah... just ruining his franchise :lol:
southpaw954
Pro Prospect
Posts: 876
And1: 29
Joined: Feb 18, 2009
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL

Re: Bulls Rumor Thread - Only Bulls! 

Post#1143 » by southpaw954 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:09 pm

Betta Bulleavit wrote:
southpaw954 wrote:
Betta Bulleavit wrote:A few things that I want to chime in on.

1 - Tech n9ne validity: I have been on this board since 2004 and was around for when Tech was calling rumors correctly left and right. It was clear that he had the inside track on organizational thinking and stuff like that. But over the past couple of years, I have grown a bit weary of the reliability of Tech and his "sources". That weariness has grown to epic proportions due to this most recent stunt. It doesn't bother me that Tech may not know anything at this point. That's probably the most likely case. I can live with that. But when you go out of your way to alert people that you have info that you are going to post to your sight between [this time and that time] and then you don't follow through, you give off the impression that you are just stringing people along just to get hits on your sight. I can't say one hundred that this was his intent, but it certainly feels like it.

2 - Bulls not making any moves: As disappointing as this may be, it was ALWAYS a distinct possibility, especially considering that there is no new CBA in place. Much of what we discussed on this board was predicated on their being a MLE similar to the one that exists now. But that is looking like less and less of a possibility. Therefore, the Bulls have to be very careful about the moves that they make before a new CBA is in place. For all we know, the Bulls may be in a better position to make moves after the CBA is agreed upon rather than doing so right now. As fans, we all want to see the big splash because it gives us something to talk about. But a GM's job isn't to satisfy the fans' need to chit chat. Their job is to make moves that are going to be in the best interest of the team. Considering the injury histories of both Noah and Boozer, it's plain to see why the Bulls would be reluctant to ship out Gibson or Asik for a player that may or may not make us a better team.

3 - GarPax standing pat: Who the hell is pat anyway? And why in the hell is he/she always standing? :D But seriously, people that talk about the Bulls always standing pat are similar to that materialistic b**ch that no man is ever going to satisfy. You may be able to criticize the moves that our organization has made, but standing pat should be the last knock on our front office. I mean seriously...how could you make such an assertion given what JUST happened right before our very eyes? Our organization is not averse to making moves. They just like to look at every nook and crany of a deal before pulling the trigger. I (for one) prefer it that way. In my opinion, the moves that you don't make are often the ones that end up paying the biggest dividends in the end. Just a thought.

Honestly who cares if he doesn't update his site like Ralph said he would. I doubt either one gets paid and if they do probably not well enough to live comfortably. Also we all have the internet. How can you b**ch about no rumors? There are tons of them all over this board and the internet.

Ralph and Tech are 2 of the better posters. They make coming here more enjoyable. Leave them alone. If there info comes, it comes. If not, Google NBA rumors and all types of BS will come up.


Also, maybe no update from them because there is nothing to update on the Bulls front.


To your first point....I really don't care. That's why I am just now commenting on it even though it has been an ongoing sub-discussion for a couple of days now. Secondly, there is a difference between random internet postings and guys that claim to have inside sources. I would hope that you understand the difference between the two. And lastly, you should really go back and read my post again. I specifically stated that the most likely case is that there is nothing to report at this point. Did you catch that? Or did you just see what you wanted to see?

I don't have a beef with Tech. But it wasn't just Ralph that said he would be updating the site. Tech came on here himself and said that. Has it happened? No. Can that be perceived as an effort to drum up hits for his site? It sure could. Does it mean that creating hits was his sole intent? Not necessarily. I was just pointing out that things LIKE this is why people have begun to question the credibility of Tech N9ne. I'm sure he's an okay guy (I don't know him) but I'm just calling it how I see it.

I read it. Just seemed more like lashing out than observing. Just sick of having to wade through the posts about the legitimacy of them(which I know am contributing to now).

Lets just talk about something else we never agree on; how to make the Bulls better.
User avatar
mrknowitall215
RealGM
Posts: 11,149
And1: 2,384
Joined: Dec 20, 2009

Re: Bulls Rumor Thread - Only Bulls! 

Post#1144 » by mrknowitall215 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:10 pm

Red Larrivee wrote:Can somebody explain to me why scouts are sleeping on Kemba Walker? I really don't get it.

All the "he's too short" stuff is such bunk. They said the same thingi about Ty Lawson (who everyone salivates over now). All the "he's not a true PG and can't learn it" stuff is such bunk. They said the same thing about Russell Westbrook and Jrue Holiday (who everyone salivates over now.). I can't believe I watched ESPN and sat through Chris Broussard calling him a poor man's Jamal Crawford and Skip Bayless calling him a poor man's Ben Gordon. Have these guys watched a freaking game?

This kid measured out at 6'1 at the freaking combine. Is he still too short? Anybody that watched an ounce of college basketball shouldn't be questioning this kid like they are, but giving worse players passes. Kemba is the most clutch player in the draft, has the biggest heart, is the best leader, has the biggest motor (yeah including big men) and is a natural scorer. Who cares if he had to be high volume. IT WORKED. Imagine what he does on a team that actually has players better than him, where he won't have to shoot for volume every night.

The kid is simply unstoppable when he gets it going. Nobody can stay in front of him, he can take it to either side, he can do the one man fast break and he can get to the line. His jumpshot, while not stellar, is improving. Defensively, he'll be fine. Kid knows what it takes to win, is coachable and has the tools to be a good defender. I think his peak is Devin Harris' all-star year.

I just don't get it. I hope he does fall to #17, so everyone looks dumb again in a couple of years when they're obsessing over how talented Kemba is and all the intangibles he has.


I don't understand the disdain for Kemba Walker either myself. How can a guy who has shown such poise and leadership en route to an hard-fought championship title deserve to see his stock fall because he doesn't have the measurables? He's 6 foot, 1 inch. The last time I checked that's about average height of the typical NBA PG. The comparisons are even worst. As much as I like Ben Gordon, Kemba's game is different in almost every aspect. Despite his scoring prowess, Kemba is probably the best defensive PG in the draft. All of these players that they are putting over Kemba, have been slayed by him during the season (Brandon Knight 2x, Derrick Williams, etc). Unless he lands in a bad situation/organization, I expect Kemba to prove all of his naysayers wrong. I believe he can be a All-Star PG in the NBA.
Image
User avatar
Payt10
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 30,622
And1: 9,200
Joined: Jun 18, 2008

Re: Bulls Rumor Thread - Only Bulls! 

Post#1145 » by Payt10 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:11 pm

I'm convinced Rumor Press isn't going to be updated. He's fooled us all.
"All I want to do is grab somebody and bang nowadays" -Brad Miller
logical_art
RealGM
Posts: 11,095
And1: 3,672
Joined: May 14, 2001

Re: Bulls Rumor Thread - Only Bulls! 

Post#1146 » by logical_art » Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:11 pm

Red Larrivee wrote:
Magilla_Gorilla wrote:Adam Morrison's athleticism didn't prove to be a real problem for him up until his first day in the NBA. Just saying.


How about Redick? Hinrich? David Lee? I mean there's plenty of players who made it in the league despite not being that athletic, or not having great length.


Holy stereotypes. Hinrich was a fine athlete. Lee is a good athlete. Redick has solid quickness for a two.
thedarkstark
Analyst
Posts: 3,230
And1: 1,224
Joined: Feb 17, 2010

Re: Bulls Rumor Thread - Only Bulls! 

Post#1147 » by thedarkstark » Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:11 pm

Lord knows I'm not a Jameer Nelson fan, but he's the only reliable option that team has outside of Dwight.
User avatar
barn34
Senior
Posts: 636
And1: 124
Joined: Oct 14, 2010

Re: Bulls Rumor Thread - Only Bulls! 

Post#1148 » by barn34 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:12 pm

the only way portland is trading that pick is if faried is already off the board. they've been in love with that kid for over a year and are not going to deal it until it's a sure thing that they won't have a second chance at him at 21.
User avatar
randybrown
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,708
And1: 275
Joined: Apr 13, 2010

Re: Bulls Rumor Thread - Only Bulls! 

Post#1149 » by randybrown » Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:12 pm

Magilla_Gorilla wrote:
Red Larrivee wrote:
logical_art wrote:You don't shoot or defend with your head. Kemba has a standing reach that's Nate Robinson-esque. His length is a liability.


His length hasn't proven to be a real problem for him so far in his basketball career.



Adam Morrison's athleticism didn't prove to be a real problem for him up until his first day in the NBA. Just saying.



I will add Kevin Durant couldn't bench 185lbs one time. :D
Length can't compare to athleticism.
logical_art
RealGM
Posts: 11,095
And1: 3,672
Joined: May 14, 2001

Re: Bulls Rumor Thread - Only Bulls! 

Post#1150 » by logical_art » Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:12 pm

Red Larrivee wrote:
logical_art wrote:Exceptions don't really prove anything. It's very difficult to justify a lottery pick at Walker's size.


No it isn't. He's more talented and a better player right now than a lot of these players in the draft. There's not 14 players better than Kemba in this draft on or off paper. If he isn't taken in the lottery, it's dumb.

And again, would you not draft Player X because of his short standing reach and wingspan?

Factor in his lack of PG skill and you've got a very risky pick.


Just like Russell Westbrook and Jrue Holiday right? Oh, and Stephen Curry.


Those guys all have good to great size for their position. Kemba has horrible size and weak PG skills. Totally different kettle of fish.
thedarkstark
Analyst
Posts: 3,230
And1: 1,224
Joined: Feb 17, 2010

Re: Bulls Rumor Thread - Only Bulls! 

Post#1151 » by thedarkstark » Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:13 pm

Payt10 wrote:I'm convinced Rumor Press isn't going to be updated. He's fooled us all.


He's full of ****. He can't let go of his past glory, stop getting your hopes up by going to his site.
AirP.
RealGM
Posts: 37,152
And1: 32,162
Joined: Nov 21, 2007

Re: Bulls Rumor Thread - Only Bulls! 

Post#1152 » by AirP. » Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:14 pm

Incredible, instead of being happy that we have a board that has some insider info posted from time to time, the inside informers get blasted for not putting "enough" free insider info. Unbelievable.

Does anyone ever think that maybe people don't have much time and for tech... he couldn't even nail down a time he would update, to me that says his time is limited.

Be happy for some inside info instead of being pissed for not enough in your opinion.
heirdog
Senior
Posts: 627
And1: 7
Joined: Jun 28, 2010

Re: Bulls Rumor Thread - Only Bulls! 

Post#1153 » by heirdog » Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:14 pm

Betta Bulleavit wrote:
1 - Tech n9ne validity: I have been on this board since 2004 and was around for when Tech was calling rumors correctly left and right. It was clear that he had the inside track on organizational thinking and stuff like that. But over the past couple of years, I have grown a bit weary of the reliability of Tech and his "sources". That weariness has grown to epic proportions due to this most recent stunt. It doesn't bother me that Tech may not know anything at this point. That's probably the most likely case. I can live with that. But when you go out of your way to alert people that you have info that you are going to post to your sight between [this time and that time] and then you don't follow through, you give off the impression that you are just stringing people along [b]just to get hits on your sight. I can't say one hundred that this was his intent, but it certainly feels like it.[/b]



Why would Tech care to drum up hits on his site? He doesn't have any ads on it, which means he is not getting paid advertising dollars, for which hits might matter to a potential advertising investor. If anything, he is trying to make a name for himself with his sources, writing and analysis so duping people and losing credibility would be the last thing he's trying to do.

Or maybe he is trying to dupe us and with more hits, there is more potential for someone to accidentally click on the link that "donates $1" to Tech. :o
User avatar
Payt10
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 30,622
And1: 9,200
Joined: Jun 18, 2008

Re: Bulls Rumor Thread - Only Bulls! 

Post#1154 » by Payt10 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:15 pm

Is it just me or is this draft not only weak talent wise but weak physically? As in nobody can bench press 185 pounds more than 20 times? Has that ever happened? I think someone said Derrick Williams was the strongest player in the draft at 19 reps.. That's kind of embarrassing.
"All I want to do is grab somebody and bang nowadays" -Brad Miller
m_willis01
Banned User
Posts: 4,163
And1: 0
Joined: May 11, 2007

Re: Bulls Rumor Thread - Only Bulls! 

Post#1155 » by m_willis01 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:16 pm

^ yeah agree..weak draft in terms of Star Power, and this draft is Loaded with the

Chris Duhons/Landry Fields/Taj Gibson types :)
User avatar
SuburbanOasis
General Manager
Posts: 7,917
And1: 22
Joined: Jun 05, 2003
Location: Illinios

Re: Bulls Rumor Thread - Only Bulls! 

Post#1156 » by SuburbanOasis » Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:17 pm

kyrv wrote:What I meant was, ideally I'd like to have a good SG and keep Taj and Asik - that does not make it doable. So while I would weigh that in and make the move, again they have much more information than I do.

I thought we would see tons of trades but once we found out the NBA actually cautioned teams to wait, well, now I think there may not be a ton of trades. The league also knows more than we do, so I do think doing not much is more a possibility than I did before, just how it played out.

But I won't complain that it's "not exciting enough for me" as one poster opined yesterday. :)



Fair.

I still think there are going to be a ton of trades. However, I think they will focus on smaller contracts and draft picks as opposed to guys like Ellis and Iguodola.

There are just too many teams who want to move around or want extra picks that a good amount of deals don't get completed.

Unfortunately/Fortunately our draft picks are too low to really get into the derby too much I would guess. I think the real movement will happen in the 4-20 range. With picks that are outside of that being used as sweetner. On the bright side, we had a much better year than everyone else, so we don't have those picks.
Image
User avatar
PMONSTER
Head Coach
Posts: 6,400
And1: 1,301
Joined: Nov 28, 2009
     

Re: Bulls Rumor Thread - Only Bulls! 

Post#1157 » by PMONSTER » Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:17 pm

Only thing I know is that if the Raptors actually get Kemba like I just saw on ESPN then we need to call them about Bayless ASAP
NBA Playoffs.... I can never wait!
User avatar
randybrown
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,708
And1: 275
Joined: Apr 13, 2010

Re: Bulls Rumor Thread - Only Bulls! 

Post#1158 » by randybrown » Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:17 pm

heirdog wrote:Or maybe he is trying to dupe us and with more hits, there is more potential for someone to accidentally click on the link that "donates $1" to Tech. :o


Attention techn9ne, i will pay $1 for a fake rumor. Please post it.

Sincerely,
1/2 of RealGM
m_willis01
Banned User
Posts: 4,163
And1: 0
Joined: May 11, 2007

Re: Bulls Rumor Thread - Only Bulls! 

Post#1159 » by m_willis01 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:20 pm

PMONSTER wrote:Only thing I know is that if the Raptors actually get Kemba like I just saw on ESPN then we need to call them about Bayless ASAP


yeah Bayless has ALOT of talent, kid just needs a good situation/good coach IMO..
TRWJINC
Banned User
Posts: 1,828
And1: 2
Joined: Oct 30, 2010

Re: Bulls Rumor Thread - Only Bulls! 

Post#1160 » by TRWJINC » Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:20 pm

I Can bench press that more then 20 times

Return to Chicago Bulls