ImageImageImageImageImage

Slather me, Lather me, Blather me - 2011 Draft Thread 5

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Slather me, Lather me, Blather me - Draft Thread 5 

Post#401 » by hands11 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 6:41 pm

nate33 wrote:Just remember.

The collective wisdom of the board hated the McGee pick. He turned out to be one of the steals of the draft.

The collective wisdom of the board hated the Booker pick. He may well be one of the steals of his draft. He has the 4th highest PER of his draft class and he defends.

The collective wisdom of the board hates the Vesely idea. Hmmm.


True. Most hated McGee.

But some of us actually targeted him from the beginning. But it was always as a seed planted that was a longer term project. Hopefully next year we get to see a more complete McGee. If only it was a full year.

Sadly, we are still in need of a complete center. Seems ever year I saw that. I'm just glad I'm not sill saying we need a PG. Seems we finally put that to rest.

At least they are finally actually rebuilding instead of patching.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Slather me, Lather me, Blather me - Draft Thread 5 

Post#402 » by hands11 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 6:48 pm

BYRDMAN RULZ wrote:I hope this is not typical EG during this draft. If he drafts anything but athleticism and toughness he should be fired. I hope he does not make one of his crazy trades where he gets fleeced. I do not want him to draft anyone that did not play on American soil last year. I like Kanter but I would rather have the 6 and 18 pick than to move up to get him. I have a feeling I am going to be mad after the draft is over.


athleticism should not be the #1 talent.

top things to find are

1) Smarts and maturity/BB IQ and or that edge. Discipline to get better and to win. Like Booker has.
2) For center. Size and ability to play D
3) for others or most positions. The ability to shoot well
4) for a SF, the ability to finish, drive and shoot form the outside.

We dont need another athletic McGee type if that player is not mature and can shoot well. We have at already.
JonathanJoseph
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,319
And1: 22
Joined: Jul 03, 2009

Re: Slather me, Lather me, Blather me - Draft Thread 5 

Post#403 » by JonathanJoseph » Thu Jun 23, 2011 6:52 pm

nate33 wrote:
BYRDMAN RULZ wrote:I know its speculation, but anytime EG pulls a trade, I always feel like we got the short end of the stick.

A justifiable concern. EG hasn't done well with trades (except the draft day trade for Booker's rights was pretty nice).

Nevertheless, I can't escape the conclusion that neither Minnesota, Utah, or Washington seem particularly happy with the best player available at their respective draft position. A trade makes a lot of sense and I think it's likely that trade discussions are in the works. It really boils down to the details. How much incentive is required to move up?


Huh?

I can think of reasons to criticize EG but criticism of his trade history seems out of line.

Caron/Kwame was a huge win.
Devin Harris/Laettner/Stackhouse for Jamison was a huge win
Cap space for Hinrich/Seraphin a huge win
Hinrich for Crawford/cap space/#18 a huge win

The Crittendon trade was probably a minor loss and the Ross/Yi trade was a push at worst. Other than the Miller/Foye trade, which made lots of sense in hindsight and also got rid of Etan Thomas' albatross contract, how can anyone be complaining about Grunfeld's trade history?
Twitter: @jonathanjoseph
The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,825
And1: 1,013
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: Slather me, Lather me, Blather me - Draft Thread 5 

Post#404 » by The Consiglieri » Thu Jun 23, 2011 6:57 pm

Rafael122 wrote:
theboomking wrote:
Rafael122 wrote:Apparently JV had a secret meeting with the Cavs on Tuesday so there's still hope...who knows...if Kanter drops to 6....that'd be nice wouldn't it?


I think the real key now is the Jazz. My guess is that they will take Kanter and force us to make a trade offer if we want him. That's what I'd do.

Just trade the 6th and 18th for the #3, and then try and buy a pick later in the first round. If you can do that, why not do it. Don't pussyfoot around!


If the Post is to be believed, and some but not all the rumors, we like Kantner, Vesely and Valunciunas, probably in the reverse order of that, and if that's so, than we wouldn't have an interest in trading away a very valuable pick for what we feel is basically a "push" in terms of talent.

Personally I'd be of the same mind, I like all three of those guys for different reasons and believe they're rated as highly as they are for good reason. If Vesely was trash, I think we'd see a lot more alarmist write ups, and he also wouldn't have been so highly rated in last years significantly better draft (I believe last year he was viewed as a guy likely to go between 4 (considered a reach) and at worst 12. He isn't a johnny come lately, he's highly thought of from loads of different sources. There is definitely a view that he needs to improve a great deal to become something special, but there also seems to be a lot of thought that with his motor, and effort at both ends, the work habits will be there, and at worst, he'll be a very valuable big man to have around.

I'm fascinated by the hate, and sort of understand it, there are lots of holes in his game, holes that may never be fixable, but I also look at the other options and I don't like them either. Kantner appears to have a low ceiling, nobody views him as someone who will ever be great, which bothers me, Leonard appears to have the same abysmal issues shooting, and scoring, Valunciunas wont be around for a year, and Bismack doesn't want to know from us, and I've never heard or seen anything to suggest that Morris will ever be anything better or worse than simply solid and/or competent, for some, that's enough, better than bust, better than my hyperbole (dime a dozen), but not remotely good enough to a waste a high lottery pick on in my view, as he's the type a guy that will be available every offseason, at a bit of a cost, but never an exorbitant one, relatively cheap in the offseason free agent market, a type that's always available in any draft, and a guy who was valued for slot 10-18 in a bad draft when 3 of the best 5 prospects were still in it. He's risen up the boards because he's low risk, because he's ascertainable in terms of talent, and because once the guys with high ceilings are gone, he's one where you definitively know what you're getting, and there's value in that, but not a ton of value, especially at the high end of the lottery. I

Personally I'm a fan of Oscar Wilde's line, "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars," and so I'd like to aim high for the pick, rather than simply aim for a guy I think we're just as likely to land at 18, as with Morris. Let 6 be slotted for swinging for the fences, it's the only way you ever win after all, a bunch of Marcus Morris types and Wall will be good enough to win us 35 to 42 games every year for another decade, basically reliving the joys of the eighties. I don't want that, and I'm willing to risk swinging and missing at 6 in a crummy draft on the off chance Vesely or Valunciunas are busts, or more likely, no more than solid euro's on the hope that they could be very special. There's a reason so many scouts are enamored with Vesely, so many reasons why he saw big minutes despite his PER numbers, his awful shooting on a very good european team, so many reasons why he was highly rated in last years draft and this years. I agree that there are alarm bells, but I'm bothered that so many people are looking at only the alarm balls, and none of the reasons why his own team, his own league, and scouts all over the NBA, think very differently than some online bloggers, stat guys, and posters here. Drafting him is in no way the end of the world.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,181
And1: 22,597
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Slather me, Lather me, Blather me - Draft Thread 5 

Post#405 » by nate33 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 6:58 pm

There is no justifying the Foye/Miller trade. The Etan dump part saved us a total of $3M. Kahn flipped Etan to OKC for a savings of about $4M. (He had to take back one small guaranteed contract, and one small unguaranteed contract.)
User avatar
Rafael122
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,818
And1: 3,548
Joined: Oct 11, 2004
       

Re: Slather me, Lather me, Blather me - Draft Thread 5 

Post#406 » by Rafael122 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 6:58 pm

Ford's latest mock, 7.1:

#6 - Vesely
#18 - Marcus Morris
#34 - Jordan Williams
Bickerstaff: who's up for kickball?!!
Ed Wood: Only if it's the no-pants variety.
User avatar
Tiago
Sophomore
Posts: 205
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 15, 2006
Location: Portugal

Re: Slather me, Lather me, Blather me - Draft Thread 5 

Post#407 » by Tiago » Thu Jun 23, 2011 6:58 pm

hands11 wrote:
BYRDMAN RULZ wrote:I hope this is not typical EG during this draft. If he drafts anything but athleticism and toughness he should be fired. I hope he does not make one of his crazy trades where he gets fleeced. I do not want him to draft anyone that did not play on American soil last year. I like Kanter but I would rather have the 6 and 18 pick than to move up to get him. I have a feeling I am going to be mad after the draft is over.


athleticism should not be the #1 talent.

top things to find are

1) Smarts and maturity/BB IQ and or that edge. Discipline to get better and to win. Like Booker has.
2) For center. Size and ability to play D
3) for others or most positions. The ability to shoot well
4) for a SF, the ability to finish, drive and shoot form the outside.

We dont need another athletic McGee type if that player is not mature and can shoot well. We have at already.



Jan Vesely has the 1) and 4) except the ability to shoot from 3 (something he's getting better)..I can see a good chemistry between Vesely and John Wall.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,149
And1: 7,912
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Slather me, Lather me, Blather me - Draft Thread 5 

Post#408 » by Dat2U » Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:01 pm

JonathanJoseph wrote:
nate33 wrote:
BYRDMAN RULZ wrote:I know its speculation, but anytime EG pulls a trade, I always feel like we got the short end of the stick.

A justifiable concern. EG hasn't done well with trades (except the draft day trade for Booker's rights was pretty nice).

Nevertheless, I can't escape the conclusion that neither Minnesota, Utah, or Washington seem particularly happy with the best player available at their respective draft position. A trade makes a lot of sense and I think it's likely that trade discussions are in the works. It really boils down to the details. How much incentive is required to move up?


Huh?

I can think of reasons to criticize EG but criticism of his trade history seems out of line.

Caron/Kwame was a huge win.
Devin Harris/Laettner/Stackhouse for Jamison was a huge win
Cap space for Hinrich/Seraphin a huge win
Hinrich for Crawford/cap space/#18 a huge win

The Crittendon trade was probably a minor loss and the Ross/Yi trade was a push at worst. Other than the Miller/Foye trade, which made lots of sense in hindsight and also got rid of Etan Thomas' albatross contract, how can anyone be complaining about Grunfeld's trade history?


Oh gawd! It's taking every bit of my strength not to tear into this post. Weren't you off the EG bandwagon a few months ago? Now your back on?

But I can't help myself on two points. Since when is an expiring contract an albatross (Etan was entering the final year of his deal)?

And how can the Jamison era (losing record overall, 8-18 playoff record) be judged as a huge win?

Plus the Miller/Foye trade never made sense. NEVER! It was doomed for failure the moment it was made and I said as much the night it went down.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,149
And1: 7,912
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Slather me, Lather me, Blather me - Draft Thread 5 

Post#409 » by Dat2U » Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:06 pm

Tiago wrote:
hands11 wrote:
BYRDMAN RULZ wrote:I hope this is not typical EG during this draft. If he drafts anything but athleticism and toughness he should be fired. I hope he does not make one of his crazy trades where he gets fleeced. I do not want him to draft anyone that did not play on American soil last year. I like Kanter but I would rather have the 6 and 18 pick than to move up to get him. I have a feeling I am going to be mad after the draft is over.


athleticism should not be the #1 talent.

top things to find are

1) Smarts and maturity/BB IQ and or that edge. Discipline to get better and to win. Like Booker has.
2) For center. Size and ability to play D
3) for others or most positions. The ability to shoot well
4) for a SF, the ability to finish, drive and shoot form the outside.

We dont need another athletic McGee type if that player is not mature and can shoot well. We have at already.



Jan Vesely has the 1) and 4) except the ability to shoot from 3, something(he's getting better)..I can see a good chemistry between Vesely and John Wall.


Vesely may have 1) but his ability to drive against NBA 3s are a major question mark. He's a turnover machine. He's got no advanced dribbling moves. Basically he's two dribbles and anything beyond that is a TO.

Vesely & Wall may have good chemistry on the break but in half court scenarios I fail to see how Vesely will positively impact the game.
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: Slather me, Lather me, Blather me - Draft Thread 5 

Post#410 » by fishercob » Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:07 pm

Can we take the Ernie talk to the Ernie thread?
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,149
And1: 7,912
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Slather me, Lather me, Blather me - Draft Thread 5 

Post#411 » by Dat2U » Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:08 pm

Rafael122 wrote:Ford's latest mock, 7.1:

#6 - Vesely
#18 - Marcus Morris
#34 - Jordan Williams


Marcus Morris is fine as the #18 pick. I'm not in love with him but he'll be better than Vesely. I'd be shocked if we chose Jordan Williams. La Sooz & the Pollin's have left the building. No more weak attempts at placating to the base by drafting a local prospect.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,149
And1: 7,912
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Slather me, Lather me, Blather me - Draft Thread 5 

Post#412 » by Dat2U » Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:09 pm

fishercob wrote:Can we take the Ernie talk to the Ernie thread?


They started it. :lol:
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,346
And1: 6,718
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: Slather me, Lather me, Blather me - Draft Thread 5 

Post#413 » by TGW » Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:10 pm

Marcus Morris at #18 would be the freakin' steal of the century.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
JonathanJoseph
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,319
And1: 22
Joined: Jul 03, 2009

Re: Slather me, Lather me, Blather me - Draft Thread 5 

Post#414 » by JonathanJoseph » Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:11 pm

nate33 wrote:There is no justifying the Foye/Miller trade. The Etan dump part saved us a total of $3M. Kahn flipped Etan to OKC for a savings of about $4M. (He had to take back one small guaranteed contract, and one small unguaranteed contract.)


Oh sure there is. Added two veteran contributors on a team that was looking to win now/then (dying owner) and cleared up more cap space than you are suggesting given that both Foye and Miller were going into expiring deals. The same cap space that allowed us to take on Hinrich.

No less than Doc Rivers said at the time that the trade made Washington a contender in the EC. That Mike Miller went into a shell and Foye was unable to find a fit in Flip's offense is regrettable and ended in a terrible result, but the trade was easily justifiable at the time.
Twitter: @jonathanjoseph
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,149
And1: 7,912
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Slather me, Lather me, Blather me - Draft Thread 5 

Post#415 » by Dat2U » Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:13 pm

TGW wrote:Marcus Morris at #18 would be the freakin' steal of the century.


Meh, I wouldn't go that far. Good value at #18 but he's got his warts too. He's definitely too small to play PF and he needs to improve his skill set to be effective at the 3. We also have no idea how he'll defend away from the basket.
JonathanJoseph
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,319
And1: 22
Joined: Jul 03, 2009

Re: Slather me, Lather me, Blather me - Draft Thread 5 

Post#416 » by JonathanJoseph » Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:14 pm

I'm done with the EG talk for now but stand by my opinion.

I'm a fan of EG outside of his franchise crippling handling of GunGate.
Twitter: @jonathanjoseph
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Slather me, Lather me, Blather me - Draft Thread 5 

Post#417 » by Ruzious » Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:14 pm

Dat2U wrote:
Ruzious wrote:
Dat2U wrote:He's got a a standing reach of 9-0 1/2 which is by no means undersized. His standing reach is the highest of any draft worthy PF in this year's draft. His weight at 227 is fine for a 20 yr old PF just entering the league. Yes, his skill level needs to improve but every single prospect in this draft has flaws. He can defend at a high level, he can rebound, he can finish and he excels at drawing fouls.

He's got a small frame. I'd say that when you have basically no offensive game, that's more than just a flaw that every single prospect has. And on what basis do you say he's a good rebounder?


A small frame? Your reaching. He's not some skinny frail kid. He's got strong base & he's solidly built. He can stand to put on a few more pounds but how many college freshman are finished products physically? And isn't drawing fouls an offensive skill? No prospect did a better job of drawing fouls than Thompson. He's got good on court awareness and has a sense for spacing and knowing when to cut to the basket. He's solid in pick & roll situations. He'll never be a 20 pt scorer but he's a mid range jumper away from being very effective. He's an excellent offensive rebounder and while his defensive rebounding numbers don't stand out, he's active at blocking out which allows his teammates to grab boards (i.e. the Brendan Haywood effect).

He does have a relatively small frame, and while it's a good thing that he draws fouls, it'd be even better if he made at least half his foul shots. He does have potential - like you say, he's fairly long and athletic and has has some success defensively, but I've rated him around Hickson level ability. And since I wasn't particularly a Hickson fan, I'm not particularly a Thompson fan. He's an okay prospect - nothing more nothing less. At least he's not quite as overrated as his teammate Jordan Hamilton - who hopefully won't be the Wiz pick at 18.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,181
And1: 22,597
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Slather me, Lather me, Blather me - Draft Thread 5 

Post#418 » by nate33 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:16 pm

JonathanJoseph wrote:
nate33 wrote:There is no justifying the Foye/Miller trade. The Etan dump part saved us a total of $3M. Kahn flipped Etan to OKC for a savings of about $4M. (He had to take back one small guaranteed contract, and one small unguaranteed contract.)


Oh sure there is. Added two veteran contributors on a team that was looking to win now/then (dying owner) and cleared up more cap space than you are suggesting given that both Foye and Miller were going into expiring deals. The same cap space that allowed us to take on Hinrich.

No less than Doc Rivers said at the time that the trade made Washington a contender in the EC. That Mike Miller went into a shell and Foye was unable to find a fit in Flip's offense is regrettable and ended in a terrible result, but the trade was easily justifiable at the time.

It was a crap trade JJ. You are embarassing yourself defending it. Foye was worthless because he was not a PG and never better than Young at SG. The Etan dump saved us less money than if we did what Kahn did and trade him to OKC. Basically, the trade boiled down to giving up the #5 for the right to pay Mike Miller $10M for one season and then watch him become an unrestricted free agent. It was predictably horrible - easily the worst trade of EG's tenure and one of the most lopsided trades of the decade.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Slather me, Lather me, Blather me - Draft Thread 5 

Post#419 » by hands11 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:19 pm

Rafael122 wrote:Ford's latest mock, 7.1:

#6 - Vesely
#18 - Marcus Morris
#34 - Jordan Williams


Getting better.

That would be interesting.

http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Jor ... iams-5864/

I like the maturity level across the board of those players.

I had us going Marcus and Tabias but Vesely and Marcus is kind of similar.

I would still rather see us trade down and get another pick or move up our 2nd rounder.

What Ves does, I think we already have in Booker and McGee except the rumor that he can shoot from the outside. I would rather add that part of his game Morris or a pure shooter like Justin.
The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,825
And1: 1,013
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: Slather me, Lather me, Blather me - Draft Thread 5 

Post#420 » by The Consiglieri » Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:19 pm

nate33 wrote:I don't think it's quite as dire. We've got a 50/50 shot at Kanter. It all boils down to what Utah does. Do they take Kanter or Knight? If they take Knight, a tradeup to Cleveland's #4 pick seems pretty doable.


Sense I'm begining to get is that we're going:

6. Kanter if he's there

6b. If he's not, we go Valunciunas

6c. If neither are there, Vesely


If all three are gone we go with Leonard, or with Thompson, or trade down. I no longer believe we're going to trade up, I think we believe that we're going to get our guy, the only scenario where I think we trade up is if Utah decides against Guard, than our move would be predicated on what word is on Toronto.

It's interesting too in that, I imagine, if we go big at 6 as we want to, we go 2 or 3 at 18. Who would our pick be at 18 if we go big? at 6?

Motiejunas: I like his upside, but I would not take him 18 unless are pick at 6 is far more conservative and low risk.

Shumpert (will probably go earlier)

J. Hamilton: All over the board, got his rear kicked in that workout against Leonard, but word is that Hamilton was sick.

Faried: Really interesting option, would love to have him.

Brooks and Jackson: Attractive options if NY isn't signed.

Mirotic and Bertans: Draft and Stash

Honeycutt and Harris: High upside guys

The chances of landing one of these guys or more than one is exactly why I wouldn't deal up for Kantner, I love slot 18, it's a great shot at landing someone as good as slot 6 options.

Return to Washington Wizards