StutterStep wrote:HesGotLength wrote:As for Brooks and Donatas, they need the ball in their hand to be effective. The Knicks have enough scorers already.
I think Shumpert simply provided the best combination of skill and need for the Knicks.
Not really! Brooks is not as bad a defender as the pundits are passing him to be. He was his team's primary scorer but he's more than capable of taking a backseat to our two main guys.
We really don't have enough scorers. That's one of the mistakes people make when evaluating this roster. Once Felton/Chandler/Gallo left, only Melo proved to be a consistent scorer next to Amare. All the other players were up/down.
We needed a SG to come in here and steady our offense by being a third consistent scorer. That's why we were sweating Jimmer/Klay! Only reason we didn't pick Brooks was because he was a senior or some dumb mess like that.
Plus, let's not discount Shumpert is rep'ed by Amare's agent!
I like the pick but we didn't get the appropriate value.
We were sweating Jimmer and Klay because they could shoot the seams off the ball.
Brooks slipped to 25, so how is that better value? There were alot of rumblings Shumpert was getting serious looks by Phoenix (either at 13 or with another pick), Minnesota at 20, Denver at 22, etc. He was rising fast. Dont think we reached much.
chadfordinsider Chad Ford
I'm stunned by meteoric rise of Iman Shumpert. He's getting looks as high as 13 to Suns. Knicks (17), Wolves (20) & Nuggets (22) in mix
20 Jun
Brooks might not be as bad on defense as people say, but there isnt exactly much to judge him on since he played alot of zone. Hes also very skinny and weak (only benched 5 times) so thats not helping him on defense either. Think Jamal Crawford.
Brooks would have been an okay choice if we wanted a pure scorer/6th man off the bench, but its not like hes the shooter we needed and we dont know how effective hed be as a 3rd/4th option off the ball. At least with Shumpert we know hes going to give us top flight defense no matter what.. I hope

. Shumpert is on another level as an athlete, who can match up with the best in the game on D. We cant say the same for Brooks, who might not even fit in well offensively. They were both risks.
Overall I think Shumpert will prove to be the better pick for us. We'll see though.
He has to get that shot of his right first and foremost.