Red Larrivee wrote:I didn't use Lee as an example of a mediocre athlete.
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1121198&start=1125
Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23
Red Larrivee wrote:I didn't use Lee as an example of a mediocre athlete.
A team source informed us that the Chicago Bulls were blown away by Saer Sene’s “athleticism, upside and speed” at a workout he recently conducted at the Berto Center. According to the source, Sene “blew the roof off the workout” and is now considered a legitimate option for the Bulls at #16. "He might be the longest person in the world!"
When talking about potential problems he might face in the NBA with the speed the game is played at, the source was adamant about the fact that he tested out extremely well off the court and that his learning curve appears to be very sharp.
Similar questions we posed via email to a coach he worked with this past year in Belgium garnered the following response: “If you saw the progression he’s made you would be amazed. His talent to pick up fundamentals is amazing. In the games he wasn't always ready to catch the ball, but for me it was more inexperience than bad hands. He's a good kid, with a golden heart. With the necessary aid of personal coaches who take their time, I really believe that he has a great future in the NBA.”
From DraftExpress.com http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Sae ... z1QM4lHuka
http://www.draftexpress.com
In terms of his upside, there is absolutely no doubt that Sene’s ceiling is just about as high as anyone in this draft due to his incredible physical attributes. Consistent reports from people that have worked with him, including his coaching staff at Belgium, say that his work ethic and personality are terrific and that he’s very hungry and motivated to become the best basketball player that he can possibly become. Seeing the way he works out on the court, it’s hard to dispute that. Sene has improved quite over the past few years according to unbiased professionals in the basketball world who have followed him, coached him and watched him in person, and should continue to improve over the next few years.
From DraftExpress.com http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Sae ... z1QM4KfPC2
http://www.draftexpress.com
logical_art wrote:Red Larrivee wrote:I didn't use Lee as an example of a mediocre athlete.
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1121198&start=1125
Red Larrivee wrote:How about Redick? Hinrich? David Lee? I mean there's plenty of players who made it in the league despite not being that athletic, or not having great length.
Red Larrivee wrote:logical_art wrote:Red Larrivee wrote:I didn't use Lee as an example of a mediocre athlete.
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1121198&start=1125
Please point me in the direction of where I say that Lee is a mediocre athleteRed Larrivee wrote:How about Redick? Hinrich? David Lee? I mean there's plenty of players who made it in the league despite not being that athletic, or not having great length.
logical_art wrote:
You strongly implied it
Red Larrivee wrote:Then what's your point against me then?
I haven't once said that my word is higher than theirs. I haven't once told anyone in here to screw their word and take what I said for it. All I've done is express an opinion. Those scouts do make a bunch of mistakes despite scouting heavily. That's not an incorrect statement. You can trot out a long list of players who they've touted highly, but ended up flopping in the NBA.logical_art wrote:
You strongly implied it
No I didn't. I said those players weren't that athletic and I stand by that. Lee isn't a bad athlete, he's a respectable one in fact. But I don't think he's that athletic. I would say the same about Luol Deng and Joakim Noah.
You're free to interpret how you want, but that's not how it was laid out.
theanimal23 wrote:I have yet to chime in since I started this thread. I'll admit, I still wish we took Brooks instead of Butler. But I think both Mirotic and Butler will be good players. Just feel that Brooks could be another Thornton.
chadrucf wrote:theanimal23 wrote:I have yet to chime in since I started this thread. I'll admit, I still wish we took Brooks instead of Butler. But I think both Mirotic and Butler will be good players. Just feel that Brooks could be another Thornton.
Just to clarify, Brooks went before we picked Butler.
Payt10 wrote:kyrv wrote:I actually love this, I had hoped they could turn one pick into a future asset for Howard or an SG.
In this draft kind of odd he lasted that long.
Still need a SG of course, but I like this a lot.
You can enjoy watching him play overseas for 4 years and then more after that when he's not good enough to play in the NBA.
This was one of the worst picks the Bulls have made in recent years. Luckily there haven't been alot of them. I just don't get it. At all. Brooks and Hamilton were right there to be had and we passed up on them for a guy that we won't even see for 4 years, if at all.
Tommy Udo 6 wrote:I love the move to acquire and wait for Mr Mirotic