ImageImageImageImageImage

Expansion Draft (Hypothetical, OT)

Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33

User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,177
And1: 17,674
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Expansion Draft (Hypothetical, OT) 

Post#1 » by babyjax13 » Mon Jul 4, 2011 6:24 pm

This is pretty simple, and hopefully it will be a fun discussion during the lockout. If there were to be an expansion draft, what 8 players from your roster would you protect?

The rules:
1. Unrestricted free agents are not available to an expansion team to draft.
2. Unsigned draft picks are not available for the expansion team to draft.
3. Restricted free agents are available.
4. Each team must have at least one player unprotected, so if team x had 8 players under contract and 4 that were UFAs, it could only protect 7 players.
5. The expansion team can only draft one player from each roster and must have at least 14 players.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,088
And1: 22,491
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Expansion Draft (Hypothetical, OT) 

Post#2 » by nate33 » Mon Jul 4, 2011 8:18 pm

The Wizards have only 7 players under contract:

Wall
Mcgee
Booker
Crawford
Blatche
Seraphin
Lewis

Young is a restricted free agent.

The decision is easy. We would leave Lewis unprotected.
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,436
And1: 4,436
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Expansion Draft (Hypothetical, OT) 

Post#3 » by closg00 » Mon Jul 4, 2011 8:29 pm

Isn't the opposite more likely to occur via contraction?
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,287
And1: 7,382
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Expansion Draft (Hypothetical, OT) 

Post#4 » by FAH1223 » Mon Jul 4, 2011 9:04 pm

Lewis, easy decision!
Image
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,797
And1: 7,922
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Expansion Draft (Hypothetical, OT) 

Post#5 » by montestewart » Mon Jul 4, 2011 10:25 pm

closg00 wrote:Isn't the opposite more likely to occur via contraction?

Well, when we get bored later, we can speculate which team might pick which Wizard in a contraction draft.
User avatar
long suffrin' boulez fan
General Manager
Posts: 7,830
And1: 3,621
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Just above Ted's double bottom line
       

Re: Expansion Draft (Hypothetical, OT) 

Post#6 » by long suffrin' boulez fan » Tue Jul 5, 2011 2:45 am

What. Is Cleveland finally getting a team?
In Rizzo we trust
verbal8
General Manager
Posts: 8,352
And1: 1,377
Joined: Jul 20, 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
     

Re: Expansion Draft (Hypothetical, OT) 

Post#7 » by verbal8 » Tue Jul 5, 2011 12:41 pm

closg00 wrote:Isn't the opposite more likely to occur via contraction?

I don't see any way the NBA would want to leave Washington DC, especially with an owner with deep pockets. I think the list of candidates would be pretty short. First off teams with history like the Celtics, Bulls and Lakers would be off the table. I think the well-run small market teams are off the table(SAS, OKC).

It would have to be teams in bad financial shape with owners who don't have deep pockets.

New Orleans would be the most obvious contraction casualty. The only other teams I could see would be Memphis, Toronto, Sacramento, Bucks and Clippers.
User avatar
daSwami
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,284
And1: 563
Joined: Jun 14, 2002
Location: Charlottesville
         

Re: Expansion Draft (Hypothetical, OT) 

Post#8 » by daSwami » Tue Jul 5, 2011 9:04 pm

Contraction actually makes good sense for the NBA, but I doubt it actually happens. If anything, Stern wants to add more teams internationally. That said, teams like the Wolves, Bucks, and Kings (read: small mkt, low intrigue) would be the first on the chopping block.

If the league does in fact contract, does anyone know how the draft order would be determined? Or will the teamless players all become FAs?
:banghead:
Scabs304
General Manager
Posts: 8,146
And1: 38
Joined: Feb 21, 2001
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Contact:
       

Re: Expansion Draft (Hypothetical, OT) 

Post#9 » by Scabs304 » Wed Jul 6, 2011 12:06 am

Unfortunatly for this team it is to simple. You protect everyone besides Lewis. You could make an argument about not protecting Blatche and hope he gets taken from you. I believe he has more value than just to give away, but there can be a case made to leave him exposed.

We are more likely to get a team contracted. New Orleans, Wolves, Bucks, Kings would all give very interesting options on a dispersal draft. How would they decide to get to draft the better players from those teams? Who would you take out of those 4?
I am Scabs.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,140
And1: 7,901
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Expansion Draft (Hypothetical, OT) 

Post#10 » by Dat2U » Wed Jul 6, 2011 1:53 am

daSwami wrote:Contraction actually makes good sense for the NBA, but I doubt it actually happens. If anything, Stern wants to add more teams internationally. That said, teams like the Wolves, Bucks, and Kings (read: small mkt, low intrigue) would be the first on the chopping block.

If the league does in fact contract, does anyone know how the draft order would be determined? Or will the teamless players all become FAs?


Contraction would be very interesting. I do wonder how that would work. I'm sure the weaker teams in the league would have the best shot at getting the remaining talent. But I wonder about the cap implications from say Chris Paul getting picked by the Cavs?

The Hornets would be an easy choice for contraction since the league is controlling the team already. The Kings, considering how desperate the Maloofs are for cash might be another. Who knows maybe DeMarcus Cousins ends up in a Wizards uni sooner than he could have hoped for.

Return to Washington Wizards