ElGee wrote:Baller, the obvious questions in this tangent are:
(1) What the hell does ast% represent?
Assists are a fuzzy, flawed stat. We're more interested in creation. Not all assists are even remotely comparable. They are a decent ballpark measure, but we know these (modern) superstars quite well and we shouldn't even have to cite raw assists, let alone "ast%."
I would certainly agree that not all assists are created the same. Some guys get them because they always have the ball in their hands, while others are really good at hitting the open man. When I speak to AST% or PTS%, I'm referring to on-court offensive produciton. Like with any stat, it must be put into context. But it does speak to the overall offensive load a player is carrying, and his responsiblities within the system.
Now not everyone player has the same quality of offensive impact, which is why a Bird will be comparable to Lebron, even though Bron's PTS% / AST% numbers dwarf his. The stats give us the insight that Bron was carrying a bigger offensive burden with the Cavs, but that it didn't result into greater offenses than what Bird had in Boston. Quantifying overall offensive imapct is just as tricky as measuring defensive imapct. So I'm just trying to draw on as many sources of info that I can.
(2) If a player outperforms someone else in a single PS series, what does it matter?
Paul Pierce is better than 2008 Kobe Bryant I suppose.
No, certainly not. But if we're talking 4 straight playoff series that were almost the real Finals, I would say it's noteworthy. Hakeem vs Shaq and Hakeem vs DRob certainly factor into his lore. When we speak to era dominance, how the best played vs the best does seem to have play. Even when they're not guarding one another(Magic vs Bird for example).
(4) How do we interpret raw stats in the context of teammates and team performance?
It's lovely if Adrian Dantley puts up amazing stats, but an offensive player's worth is determined by how well he lifts the entire performance of the offensive SYSTEM. See: Johnson, Magic. Bird, Larry. Nash, Steve. Etc.
That's a great point, and actually what I was trying to show with Bryant. The dual role he had as volume scorer & facilitator on great offenses was extremely impactful on offense. I feel Kobe's skills as a floor general go underrated. He's not as good of a passer as the guys you listed, but he's great at setting the offense, managing the tempo, and overseeing spacing. Even in the 3-peat days, Kobe's offensive role, production, and impact were critical.
For the record, I have Bryant's best offensive season as 2010 (marred a little by injury) and Hakeem's as 1995. Late peaks FTW!
Normalized per 75 pos
10 Bryant: 27.0 pts 5.0 ast +2.4% TS 109 ORtg (Team 108.8)
95 Hakeem: 26.8 pts 3.4 ast +3.4% TS 110 ORtg (Team 109.7)
PS
10 Bryant: 29.3 pts 5.5 ast +2.4% TS115 ORtg (Team 112.8 vs. 105.9 Opp DRtg)
95 Hakeem: 30.5 pts 4.2 ast +0.%9 TS 110 ORtg (Team 115.2 vs 107.5 Opp DRtg)
So even starting from here, it's hard to see some large edge...
I would rank around 6 of his seasons above 2010 offensively. He did start great that season. His work in the post was elite, but he was never 100% after the injury and his efficiency took a tumble.
Do you have all 3 guy's career years by chance. If not, perhaps I can pull those up. I would think that throughout the majority of their careers, Kobe has a sizable advantage. I'm also interested to see how TD compares to Hakeem.