ImageImage

Josh Smith's Peak

Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver

User avatar
Ruhiel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 45
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Josh Smith's Peak 

Post#1 » by Ruhiel » Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:26 am

Playoffs Rd2 G4 Cavaliers@Hawks 2009

Hawks were neck and neck with Cavs, started marv, & Al.

Guarding Lebron Delonte on switches shooting 15 foot

Horford was 0 for 3 smdh.

This is the Josh Smith who everyone said could play small forward.

The Josh Smith we saw this year was the old guy at the park who has no conditioning or speed and settles for jump shots and gets tired after 1 drive.

+1 to anyone who sees the fake he got from his work with Hakeem Olajuwon that he tries to get off. :lol:

He was scoring in the post against slow Varejao and Ilgauskas... lift on his jumpers, this guy is/was an SF.

As is, Smith he gets no lift on his jumper, has a hitch in his shot, no stamina yadayada
.......
2009
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gI8Q6l1Ysqg[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bl4feTyk7c[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uV5xtfFD2UE[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kJsi7yJuHM[/youtube]
2011
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpsfJmEOcek[/youtube]
td00
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,858
And1: 70
Joined: Aug 23, 2005
Location: CATLANTA

Re: Josh Smith's Peak 

Post#2 » by td00 » Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:52 pm

I put Josh back at SF asap. He has no business trying to create a drive standing still facing the basket. And that jumper is not Lamar Odom-esque.

Let Al play SF since he doesn't want to play center, bang inside or play defense. The next great idea from one Larry Drew. Interchangeable parts are much better than true basketball players.
User avatar
Ruhiel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 45
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Re: Josh Smith's Peak 

Post#3 » by Ruhiel » Wed Jul 27, 2011 12:54 pm

td00 wrote:I put Josh back at SF asap. He has no business trying to create a drive standing still facing the basket. And that jumper is not Lamar Odom-esque.

Let Al play SF since he doesn't want to play center, bang inside or play defense. The next great idea from one Larry Drew. Interchangeable parts are much better than true basketball players.


Come again?
td00
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,858
And1: 70
Joined: Aug 23, 2005
Location: CATLANTA

Re: Josh Smith's Peak 

Post#4 » by td00 » Wed Jul 27, 2011 4:55 pm

I dont see any value with having Josh at SF. You might as well put Al there. We weren't any better in 2011 than 2010 or 2009. A weaker Orlando and Teague allows Drew to look better than he really is.

I still think we have overlapped talent and not enough balance in the starting 5. That is my beef.

With his statements about having interchangeable parts, it only points out how he still has Knight and Woodson traits in his strategy. So what does Sund do? As little as possible.

Sund as a puppet might be better than making major moves. We are stuck at this level.
User avatar
Ruhiel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 45
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Re: Josh Smith's Peak 

Post#5 » by Ruhiel » Wed Jul 27, 2011 5:39 pm

Wow, did I forget to put the video up???
MaceCase
General Manager
Posts: 8,363
And1: 2,483
Joined: Apr 08, 2009
       

Re: Josh Smith's Peak 

Post#6 » by MaceCase » Wed Jul 27, 2011 7:29 pm

*sigh* that series could have been different if Al didn't have the severe ankle sprain and Marvin didn't have torn ligaments in his shooting wrist.
*WLONC*
We Like Our New Core
User avatar
Ruhiel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 45
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Re: Josh Smith's Peak 

Post#7 » by Ruhiel » Wed Jul 27, 2011 7:39 pm

"severe" ankle sprain? I thought it was a regular sprain. wasn't that Joe Johnson?
MaceCase
General Manager
Posts: 8,363
And1: 2,483
Joined: Apr 08, 2009
       

Re: Josh Smith's Peak 

Post#8 » by MaceCase » Wed Jul 27, 2011 7:55 pm

I would think it was severe considering
1) he missed two games that playoffs (game 6 in Miami plus game 2 in Cleveland) not including most of game 5 against Miami when it first occurred
2) he only managed to clock 30+ minutes twice after returning and barely 25 minutes max in the other two games.

In the video you posted Fratello even refers to Al as one of Atlanta's "walking wounded" in the first 3 minutes of action. Wasn't hard to miss for those of us that were here then.
No wait, it was Dick Stockton at the 10 minute mark.
*WLONC*
We Like Our New Core
User avatar
Ruhiel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 45
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Re: Josh Smith's Peak 

Post#9 » by Ruhiel » Mon Aug 1, 2011 4:09 pm

@MaceCase
Horford gets an ankle sprain every season. Hard to miss. He drives gets caught in the air tries to use 'hangtime' and injures it. He did it against Miami this season too.
MaceCase
General Manager
Posts: 8,363
And1: 2,483
Joined: Apr 08, 2009
       

Re: Josh Smith's Peak 

Post#10 » by MaceCase » Mon Aug 1, 2011 5:36 pm

Every player get's ankle sprains and they always say "if it was the playoffs or a big game, I'd be playing"
exxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxcept in the case where it's actually really that bad that they can't play through it.

I've yet to see you make an argument against the severity of it during that playoffs though other than referencing (lol) this past regular season..... Also funny that Al has only had two seasons where he's missed games due to injury and only one where he missed more than one game due to a sprained ankle, again, this past season........
No I'm definitely not seeing the depth of someone's history/agenda here, that's truly hard to miss.
*WLONC*
We Like Our New Core
User avatar
Ruhiel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 45
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Re: Josh Smith's Peak 

Post#11 » by Ruhiel » Mon Aug 1, 2011 7:30 pm

I seriously doubt that the Hawks would have beaten the Cavs with or without Al Horford healthy.

I'm tired of hearing excuses for Al.

Al ranked 111th in the NBA for free throws attempted. But his set shooting % led the league iirc.
Does he have some special injury that makes his set shot extremely accurate but doesn't open him up for more free throws?

No that's his "game" he can't shoot off the dribble. It doesn't matter how many pick and pops we run, how many off ball screens we set for him he's not going to ever be a true forward.

Now we're hearing that throughout his 4 year NBA career and 2 NCAA championships he never worked on his post moves, Give me a break. No way.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpwVhxDovK4[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olboE9cc-sQ[/youtube]

Horford always tries to drive baseline, In his case Al's right hand hook shot is hamstringed by his lack of length and in combination with his average speed means it will always be contested.
azuresou1
Head Coach
Posts: 7,444
And1: 1,095
Joined: Jun 15, 2009
   

Re: Josh Smith's Peak 

Post#12 » by azuresou1 » Mon Aug 1, 2011 9:01 pm

Your agenda is hilarious.

Al Horford has gotten better every season. Josh Smith has not. For some reason, you're convinced that we need to trade Al Horford for scrubs.
User avatar
Ruhiel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 45
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Re: Josh Smith's Peak 

Post#13 » by Ruhiel » Tue Aug 2, 2011 3:35 am

azuresou1 wrote:Your agenda is hilarious.

Al Horford has gotten better every season. Josh Smith has not. For some reason, you're convinced that we need to trade Al Horford for scrubs.


First this entire thread is about Smith regressing. Smith plateauing does not make Horford a better player.
Overall, Smith was atrocious this year. His WS/48 was almost 4% worse than last year, That's what this thread is about.

Secondly, "Al Horford has gotten better every season" is an abstract and cliche statement.

Al's Totals - 2011
Field Goals: 1st
FGA: 1st
Points: 1st
FG%: 1st (increased 0.6 of 1 percent)
Assists: 1st (77 more than in 2009-10 in 145 less minutes)

Turnovers: 2nd
minutes played: 2nd
Steals: tied for 2nd/3rd. (same as last year)
Free Throws: 3rd
Offense Rebounds: 3rd
Defense Rebounds: 3rd
Total Rebounds: 3rd (81 less than 2009-10 in 145 less minutes)
Blocks: 3rd
Free Throw Attempts: 4th (82 less than 2009-10 in 145 less minutes)


Al Horford increased all his points, number of shot attempts, shots made etc.

And yet his free throws fell to all time lows. Yet you said he improved.

The numbers say plateaued.

WS/48
2007-08 0.103
2008-09 0.145
2009-10 0.183
2010-11 0.179

PER
2007-08 14.7
2008-09 17.0
2009-10 19.4
2010-11 20.7

What exactly do you think he's improved?
azuresou1
Head Coach
Posts: 7,444
And1: 1,095
Joined: Jun 15, 2009
   

Re: Josh Smith's Peak 

Post#14 » by azuresou1 » Tue Aug 2, 2011 2:20 pm

Stop using WS% since you clearly don't understand what it means. But yes, Josh Smith is clearly no longer as athletic as he even was a year ago.

Horford's FT%, AST%, and range have improved every year while his TOV% and PF rate have decreased. It's hilarious you claim how he has plateaued and yet list his PER which has also increased every year, and not by insignificant amounts. So his FT rate fell - he's still putting up a .587 TS% which WAY eclipses Josh's .540.
User avatar
Ruhiel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 45
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Re: Josh Smith's Peak 

Post#15 » by Ruhiel » Tue Aug 2, 2011 3:52 pm

azuresou1 wrote:Stop using WS% since you clearly don't understand what it means. But yes, Josh Smith is clearly no longer as athletic as he even was aea yr ago.

WS% is the attempt measure of how many wins you generated while you were on the court. Depending on how much time you played the estimate translates to wins.
So please don't try to justify anything with claims of Etan Thomas who nvr plays.
...........
Horford's WS/48 went from 18.3% to 17.9% this year. Plateauing
The only way to improve AL's WS/48 is to get BETTER players on the team. Better shooters, better centers who are automatic finishers next to All NBA point guard Al Horford.
That is not plausible.

Horford's FT%, AST%, and range have improved every year while his TOV% and PF rate have decreased.

Secondly, His assist % has not improved literally every year. It took a step back last year and a step forward this year.
His Free Throw%? You're being extremely disengenuous to defend Al now.
He made 2 Free Throws out of 2.5 FTA. Really? that's considered improvement?

Give me Blake Griffin's forward skills and minutes so I can create 8-9 free throw attempts per game


Even worse is that despite shooting only 270 FTA in 2010 and making .789 this year he shot less than 188 free throws and hit .798.

He cant dribble/create into contact, he shoots less free throws and shoots an the same percentage.
79% in 2010 to 80% in 2011. He was matured out of college.

He'd be lucky to get 4 FTA considering his forever minimal usage rate. This is PLATEAUing.

Every game he'd get what amounts to one or two trips to the free throw line.
What starting power forward or center does that in 36 mpg????

t's hilarious you claim how he has plateaued and yet list his PER which has also increased every year, and not by insignificant amounts.


Again, lying:
compared to
2007-08 14.7
2008-09 17.0
+ 2.3
2008-09 17.0
2009-10 19.4
and
+ 2.4
2009-10 PER 19.4
2010-11 PER 20.7

+1.3 isn't insignificant? Plateau.

So his FT rate fell - he's still putting up a .587 TS% which WAY eclipses Josh's .540.


Is this now a Josh versus Al thread? Smith is slow and cant shoot playing a half court game.

What is Al's excuse??
TS% Usage
Amare Stoudemire, .565 27.7
Blake Griffin, .549 25.6
Carlos Boozer, .542 24.9
Zach Randolph, .552 23.0
Brook Lopez, .549 24.7
Dwight Howard, .616 24.3

Al Horford, .587 18.5* career high

Shaquille O'Neal, .659 17.6


a halfway retired Shaq demanded near the same amount of possessions usage and blew Al out the water.

Al is not Blake, he's not Amare. He's what would happen if Tim Duncan did not possess the advantage of being 6'10.

Both look awkward shooting hooks but Horford's hook shots are contested, cant shoot over the defense with ease, worse rebound #s, worse USG %ball less, worse assist #s, worse blocks. Everything all around worse.

Al is a finished product, He as not improved each year and the only way to improve him is to do what Tyson Chandler and put him next to a Jason Kidd, a Dirk Nowitzki etc. type team.
He's a 4th option and would have to play center (usage wise) on any championship team of the last 5 years.

Do we have that type of dominant HoF talent to make his game work? no.
azuresou1
Head Coach
Posts: 7,444
And1: 1,095
Joined: Jun 15, 2009
   

Re: Josh Smith's Peak 

Post#16 » by azuresou1 » Tue Aug 2, 2011 6:50 pm

I don't know whether to laugh or cry at your ignorance.

WS% indicates such gems as Tyson Chandler was more important to the Mavs than Dirk. That in itself should tell you all you need to know about the stat.

Okay, I was wrong about his assist rate improving every year. It has, however, skyrocketed from 10.4% to 17.5% this past season. He makes 79.8% of his FTs, which means that he is very consistent at the line. Nowhere have I said he draws many fouls.

Ruhiel wrote:Again, lying:
compared to
2007-08 14.7
2008-09 17.0
+ 2.3
2008-09 17.0
2009-10 19.4
and
+ 2.4
2009-10 PER 19.4
2010-11 PER 20.7

+1.3 isn't insignificant? Plateau.


This is a ****ing joke, right? Right?



Is this now a Josh versus Al thread? Smith is slow and cant shoot playing a half court game.

What is Al's excuse??
TS% Usage
Amare Stoudemire, .565 27.7
Blake Griffin, .549 25.6
Carlos Boozer, .542 24.9
Zach Randolph, .552 23.0
Brook Lopez, .549 24.7
Dwight Howard, .616 24.3

Al Horford, .587 18.5* career high

Shaquille O'Neal, .659 17.6


a halfway retired Shaq demanded near the same amount of possessions usage and blew Al out the water.


Maybe we should try passing the ball to Al Horford then.

Al is not Blake, he's not Amare. He's what would happen if Tim Duncan did not possess the advantage of being 6'10.

Both look awkward shooting hooks but Horford's hook shots are contested, cant shoot over the defense with ease, worse rebound #s, worse USG %ball less, worse assist #s, worse blocks. Everything all around worse.


Yes, Al Horford is not as good as Tim Duncan. What a ****ing shocker.

Al is a finished product, He as not improved each year and the only way to improve him is to do what Tyson Chandler and put him next to a Jason Kidd, a Dirk Nowitzki etc. type team.
He's a 4th option and would have to play center (usage wise) on any championship team of the last 5 years.

Do we have that type of dominant HoF talent to make his game work? no.


Al Horford has literally gone from a pretty poor outside shooter (35%) to the best mid-range shooter by % in the league (53%). He has become a better passer, makes fewer turnovers, and has also cut down on his foul rate. For you to claim he is a finished product is just baffling stupid.
User avatar
Ruhiel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 45
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Re: Josh Smith's Peak 

Post#17 » by Ruhiel » Tue Aug 2, 2011 8:12 pm

I don't know whether to laugh or cry at your ignorance.

WS% indicates such gems as Tyson Chandler['s production in 26mpg mimiced Dirk's production and Mark Cuban was a genius for getting him]. That in itself should tell you all you need to know about the stat.


18.4 PER a stat biased to scoring


12.2% all offensive boards in 2059 minutes
26.6% all defensive boards in 2059 minutes
19.7% total rebounds available in 2059 minutes
3.0% blocks all shots. Josh Smith is 3.5%

131 Offensive Rating - he finishes all shots, alters shots to start fast breaks fueling team's offense. plays next to Jason Kidd, Jason Terry, Shawn Marion and Dirk Nowitzki.


And last of all .697 True Shooting...
4.0 Free Throws per Game, he plays 26 mpg.


In limited minutes a highly athletic center who shoots 70% True Shooting can play as good as a 32 year old Dirk Nowitzki.

You don't need your center to play 36 mpg and can mix up minutes to produce wins.

Shocker.

Okay, I was wrong about his assist rate improving every year. It has, however, skyrocketed from 10.4% to 17.5% this past season.

I already said this:
Ruhiel wrote: Assists: 1st (77 more than in 2009-10 in 145 less minutes)

and then went to note that the 77 more assists were at the sacrifice of his already weak FTA.

Where does Horford rank amongst Cs or better yet PFs? And yet you will go on to note that we should pass him the ball more.

He doesn't get enough touches yet he had 76 more assists than Dirk in only 200 less minutes.

Al will make quite the point guard one day.

Only passive role playing big men or dominant double team drawers pass the ball that much.

He makes 79.8% of his FTs, which means that he is very consistent at the line. Nowhere have I said he draws many fouls.


Al Horford averaged 5 free throws every 2 games... :lol:
His FT% is irrelevant and I know you know this.
Would any past champion give away their ability to draw free throws by the HUNDREDs just to shoot a higher %? :lol:


Is this now a Josh versus Al thread? Smith is slower than ever and thus cant create easy situation points consistently playing a half court game.

Al is at ideal weight. His length and height won't improve at this point. What is Al's excuse??
TS% Usage
Amare Stoudemire, .565 27.7
Blake Griffin, .549 25.6
Carlos Boozer, .542 24.9
Zach Randolph, .552 23.0
Brook Lopez, .549 24.7
Dwight Howard, .616 24.3

Al Horford, .587 18.5* career high

Shaquille O'Neal, .659 17.6


a halfway retired Shaq demanded near the same amount of possessions usage and blew Al out the water.

Maybe we should try passing the ball to Al Horford then.[/quote]

Right on cue.

Its everyone elses fault he doesn't shoot the ball. If Amare got the ball what would he do?

Attack the bucket with complex moves and length or amass 266 assists. Please.


Al is not Blake, he's not Amare. He's what would happen if Tim Duncan did not possess the advantage of being 6'10.

Both look awkward shooting hooks but Horford's hook shots are contested, cant shoot over the defense with ease, worse rebound #s, worse USG %ball less, worse assist #s, worse blocks. Everything all around worse.


Yes, Al Horford is not as good as Tim Duncan. What a ****ing shocker.[/quote]

No Al Horford has no post game and is not a dependable scoring 4, He can't isolate he has no discernable skill or physical advantage there.

Thats why he overdepends on his primitive set shot.

If his usage rate goes up that means his Assist% goes down and True Shooting % as well since you admitted yourself his primitive post game is terrible.

Duncan missed plenty of his hook shots. He just got a decent % them back with his 7'0 frame. Check his 3s.


Horford cannot get open shots. We pass him the ball azuresou1. Horford is not a good individual shot creator. At all.
You give all these #'s about Al but they are all hard stat's to improve.

You say Horford can't navigate a simple hook shot like Duncan but he needs more touches?

He gets touches! He passes them back. He's not a natural scorer. Period.


Someone's PER increasing by 3 in a 2nd year then by 1 next year is called diminishing returns/plateauing.


Despite your incredulous arguments, including Al Horford with his more assists than free throws is not getting enough touches AND trying to discredit Tyson Chandler as a major piece in winning the title, I'll humor you.
What is Horford supposed stats next year. Especially interested in USG% and Assists per game.
azuresou1
Head Coach
Posts: 7,444
And1: 1,095
Joined: Jun 15, 2009
   

Re: Josh Smith's Peak 

Post#18 » by azuresou1 » Tue Aug 2, 2011 8:56 pm

Your argument is all over the place.

Tyson Chandler's WS% increased by something like 70% simply from switching teams. Did he get better? No, he got on a better team and pretty much only had to defend and be a garbage man. He is nowhere near as useful to a team as Dirk is, and if you take Dirk off the Mavs they suddenly drop to a borderline playoff team. Take Tyson Chandler off the Mavs and they're still a second round playoff team.

No, Al Horford is not as assertive as he should be. Despite that, he makes the right play, and I find it hilarious you're trying to construe passing ability as a bad thing. Or his FT%, especially since FT shooting is the biggest flaw for many Cs. Shaq, for all his dominance, couldn't play the last 3-4 minutes of close games because he was a horrible FT shooter.

Your argument for Al Horford being a bad player is that he's not amazing. What kind of joke argument is that? He's obviously a second/third option - that doesn't make him a bad player.

Literally trying to make an argument that Al Horford getting assists makes him a bad player. XFD.

Al Horford 2011-2012: 18 P/36, 17 TRB%, 16.5 AST%, 12 TOV%, 21 USG%
User avatar
Ruhiel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 45
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Re: Josh Smith's Peak 

Post#19 » by Ruhiel » Tue Aug 2, 2011 11:37 pm

azuresou1 wrote:Your argument is all over the place.

Tyson Chandler's WS% increased by something like 70% simply from switching teams. Did he get better?

Lies. We had this discussion before. Tyson Chandler had a well documented foot injury.

"Then everything collapsed. Or, more accurately, Chandler’s knee, ankle, and foot did. He was limited to just 45 games last season before being traded to the Charlotte Bobcats over the summer, and he’s only played 28 out of a possible 56 games for the ‘Cats this season. To make matters worse, even the court time Chandler has seen over the past two years has been limited, and Tyson seems like a shade of his former self."

You said this in the other thread. FAIL. He was injured and athletic finishers who grab boards are quite valuable.


No, he got on a better team and pretty much only had to defend and be a garbage man.

Can Al Horford defend and Rebound 20% of all boards get to the free throw line and be a garbage man? Al Jefferson? who? only elite bigs do these things.

He is nowhere near as useful to a team as Dirk is, and if you take Dirk off the Mavs they suddenly drop to a borderline playoff team. Take Tyson Chandler off the Mavs and they're still a second round playoff team.


ooookay... First win shares says Dirk was 11 wins. So taking him off inn a vaccuum would mean 46 wins.
I can imagine replacing Tyson (Bogut) at C. I can't imagine replacing their volume scoring PF.

I can imagine replacing Al at C. I can't imagine Horford becoming a volume scoring PF.


Seriously. Are you saying that in the talent depleted NBA is easier to replace Tyson Chandler at C than Dirk Nowitzki at PF?

shocker.

No, Al Horford is not assertive...

NO he's not dominant. Jack of all trades.
Despite that, he makes the right play, and I find it hilarious you're trying to construe passing ability as a bad thing.


Now that I know you see him as a center (perhaps the most interchangeable championship position over the past 4 years) it makes sense. You see him as an offensive center,
too bad centers aren't supposed to go out of their way to make an assist.

On a championship team you don't put Al Horford at center and then put Bibby, Crawford, Joe Johnson to milk passing.
Then you know Smith can't shoot so the stretch forward is Marvin Williams!

Dallas has Dirk, we have Marvin Williams! Or if it's post-up-get-offensive-boards-forward LA has Pau, San ANtonio had Duncan, we have Josh Smith an SF.

Great team construction!
Al "I need help down low" Horford cannot guard centers,
He cannot score at a high pace and use possessions from the PF. He's a tweener.

Or his FT%, especially since FT shooting is the biggest flaw for many Cs. Shaq, for all his dominance, couldn't play the last 3-4 minutes of close games because he was a horrible FT shooter.

So you would take Shaq off of the Lakers for Horford?

The point isn't too 2 free throws its to get to the line. You know that's a flaw. Horford is playing a whole different brand of passive, inferior basketball than Shaquille O'Neal.

It is exactly what u just said Al Horford is an undersized offensive center. Not a power forward.

Free throw shooting? How do you not see that 1 trip to the free throw line isn't a flaw?
THat's terrible basketball.

Kendrick Perkins is a defensive center. Andrew Bynum is defense (he is not slowing the offense down or getting touches next to Bryant or Pau. sorry).

We need an offensive power forward. Not an offensive center.

No one wins with an offensive center, unless Shaq and Tim Duncan (?) are being counted
and as you said Horford is not as good at scoring as them.


Your argument for Al Horford being a bad player is that he's not amazing. What kind of joke argument is that? He's obviously a second/third option - that doesn't make him a bad player.


Again. Lie. Iirc I clearly said 4th option.

Usage Rate/%

REG. SEASON
Dirk Nowitzki 28.2
Jason Terry 24.7
Shawn Marion 21.5
(and this is when he's old and FAR from his TS% and scoring/finishing peaks)
Jason Kidd 14.3

2004 Pistons
Richard Hamilton 25.7 Tim Duncan 28.9
Chauncey Billups 23.5 Tony Parker 25
Rasheed Wallace 23.2 Manu Ginobili 24.3

Tayshaun Prince 15.6 Rasho Nesterovic 13.5

Literally trying to make an argument that Al Horford getting assists makes him a bad player


Literally you're making an argument that he's a 3rd option when he's a 4th option on a losing team (Hawks) and any recent championship team.

We're not getting Shaq, Duncan, Kobe, Nowitzki etc. Thus Horford is not a 3rd option.
If we had such a dominant player Horford could be 3rd, sure because they carry such a load.

Unfortunately we have Johnson (ideally 2nd option ~25%), Smith (3rd option, ideally 23%).
User avatar
Ruhiel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,502
And1: 45
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Re: Josh Smith's Peak 

Post#20 » by Ruhiel » Tue Aug 2, 2011 11:39 pm

Al Horford 2011-2012: 18 P/36, 17 TRB%, 16.5 AST%, 12 TOV%, 21 USG%


and of course no shooting percentages.

For single seasons; played in the NBA/BAA; in the regular season; from 1946-47 to 2010-11; requiring Points Per Game >= 17
Total Rebound Pct >= 16
Assist Pct >= 16
Turnover Pct <= 14
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Al Horford 2011-2012: 18 P/36, 17 TRB%, 16.5 AST%, 12 TOV%, 21 USG%
TRB% AST% USG%
Hakeem Olajuwon* 1993-94 16.2 16.4 29.8
Shaquille O'Neal 2001-02 16.3 16.4 31.6
Shaquille O'Neal 2002-03 16.5 16.2 31.8
Karl Malone *1992-93 16.9 16.9 28.0
Karl Malone* 1993-94 16.3 17.1 30.3
Karl Malone* 1994-95 17.4 16.4 32.7
http://bit.ly/noCERe
How do you assist 16.5% (1 / 6) of all shots yet only have a usage of 21% (1 out of every 5)?
Is he a finisher or a passer? Is he dominant or passive? smh

;;;;;;;;;;;;
2010: 15.7 P/36, 16 TRB%, 17.5 AST%, 10.6 TOV%, 21 USG%
2011: 18 P/36, 17 TRB%, 16.5 AST%, 12 TOV%, 21 USG%

So basically he increases his PPG by 2, gets 1% better on rebounds, but does more or less same assisting, turns the ball over more and shoots the same Usage %. 21%.
You cannot be that dominant an assist man and rebounding and only use 21% of all shots yet score only 18 points.
Plateau.

Horford's playoff career high usage was in 2009-2010 at 19.2% of all possessions.

No one needs a 4th option center who cant defend centers or put them in foul trouble. We got blown out by 40ppg if you forgot.

Return to Atlanta Hawks