COMM THREAD XVI IN HONOR OF RUNAWAY BRIDES

Jetset · Post #661 » by **Jetset** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 2:38 am

G=K wrote:Yeah But I changed my avy back and we beat SF the other night so we're good. Just can't not have a Pirates avatar until the playoffs are over.

No offense bro but I don't see you guys in the playoffs. You had a nice resurgence but I can't see the buck-o's beating the Cards or the Brewers for the division or the wildcard. Hell, the Reds could even go on a run.

You guys should've added Beltran. Would've contributed to your team more than your two additions would've combined. And he wouldn't have gone to the hated Giants.

Gek · Post #662 » by **Gek** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 2:39 am

Yeah I know, if we didn't lose 9 or 10 in a row there we'd have had a shot. I want to finish above .500 for once.

Post #663 » by **TyCobb** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 2:43 am

That was a close one. Angels beat the Skanks.

tugs · Post #664 » by **tugs** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 2:43 am

RiotSweetie wrote:And that looks complicated. How would you pull that off?

wanna practice? :eyebrows:

Jetset · Post #665 » by **Jetset** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 2:45 am

G=K wrote:Yeah I know, if we didn't lose 9 or 10 in a row there we'd have had a shot. I want to finish above .500 for once.

I can't remember who the Pirates played against, but ever since the umpire got that call wrong and costed the Pirates the game your season has been in the dumps.

Still think you'll manage to somehow finish above .500 though. They'll need to make some splashes in F.A. or actually trade the many talented prospects they have if they're serious about contending.

TyCobb wrote:That was a close one. Angels beat the Skanks.

Yanks will buy the umps for the next game and Angels will get blown out.

Gek · Post #666 » by **Gek** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 2:47 am

Jetset wrote:
G=K wrote:Yeah I know, if we didn't lose 9 or 10 in a row there we'd have had a shot. I want to finish above .500 for once.

I can't remember who the Pirates played against, but ever since the umpire got that call wrong and costed the Pirates the game your season has been in the dumps.

Still think you'll manage to somehow finish above .500 though. They'll need to make some splashes in F.A. or actually trade the many talented prospects they have if they're serious about contending.

TyCobb wrote:That was a close one. Angels beat the Skanks.

Yanks will buy the umps for the next game and Angels will get blown out.

It was the Braves. That call was absolutely atrocious.

Post #667 » by **TyCobb** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 2:47 am

Jetset wrote:Yanks will buy the umps for the next game and Angels will get blown out.

The Angels called up their best pitching prospect, Garrett Richards, to make his Major League debut tomorrow. Going to be on ESPN too for Wednesday night baseball. You should watch it.

LaLa · Post #668 » by **LaLa** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 2:48 am

Jetset wrote:
G=K wrote:Yeah But I changed my avy back and we beat SF the other night so we're good. Just can't not have a Pirates avatar until the playoffs are over.

No offense bro but I don't see you guys in the playoffs. You had a nice resurgence but I can't see the buck-o's beating the Cards or the Brewers for the division or the wildcard. Hell, the Reds could even go on a run.

You guys should've added Beltran. Would've contributed to your team more than your two additions would've combined. And he wouldn't have gone to the hated Giants.

Ever since we got him, we've been sucking ffuu.

RiotSweetie · Post #669 » by **RiotSweetie** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 2:53 am

Time to get mah belly round.

Jetset · Post #670 » by **Jetset** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 2:55 am

G=K wrote:It was the Braves. That call was absolutely atrocious.

Another reason as to why the sport needs replay.

TyCobb wrote:
Jetset wrote:Yanks will buy the umps for the next game and Angels will get blown out.

The Angels called up their best pitching prospect, Garrett Richards, to make his Major League debut tomorrow. Going to be on ESPN too for Wednesday night baseball. You should watch it.

Probably will. Just to see the 17-3 final score. Yanks win btw.

LaLa wrote:Ever since we got him, we've been sucking ffuu.

And I'm loving every minute of it. Did you see you guys almost get swept? I won't mention by what team though.

Gek · Post #671 » by **Gek** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 2:56 am

Not feeling the riot quotes in the sig phase.

LaLa · Post #672 » by **LaLa** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 2:57 am

And that brawl was a sight to see.

Post #673 » by **TyCobb** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 2:58 am

Start posting funny stuff and you might make an appearance.

Gek · Post #674 » by **Gek** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 2:59 am

If my creativity is censored then I shall not be creative!

Jetset · Post #675 » by **Jetset** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 2:59 am

Ty is such a trendsetting fashionista.

LaLa wrote:And that brawl was a sight to see.

How old is your catcher?

Jetset · Post #676 » by **Jetset** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 3:03 am

GK needs to go back to the MF Doom sig. Not feeling this sig with it's eyes eaten out.

LaLa · Post #677 » by **LaLa** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 3:03 am

Like mid to late 20s I think.

Gek · Post #678 » by **Gek** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 3:06 am

Jetset wrote:GK needs to go back to the MF Doom sig. Not feeling this sig with it's eyes eaten out.

RiotSweetie · Post #679 » by **RiotSweetie** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 3:08 am

G=K wrote:Not feeling the riot quotes in the sig phase.

Yeah, ionno if I should be confused, pleased, or WTF.

I think I'm leaning towards pleased and confused. Ty is making a hobby out of this.

LaLa · Post #680 » by **LaLa** » Wed Aug 10, 2011 3:09 am

I like nails.