kwamebargnani wrote:No he isn't. Just because he's playing almost everyday, doesn't make him a true everyday player. The only reason Hill is playing everyday is because of his salary and lack of alternatives, although Jmac is better. A player with crappy offense and defense is not the definition of an everyday player.
What are you saying here? What is a true everyday player? Hill plays everyday. How do you define everyday player? A player that plays everyday (most)?
Hill might not be the most productive player right now. But he is playing everyday. Thus, he's a everyday player.
kwamebargnani wrote:That part just states what I already know. We all know how the compensation system works. I'm just not sure if you do. How many times in this thread did I tell you there is zero chance Hill declines arbitration if AA is crazy enough to even offer it? the article was published almost two freakin months ago. The writer probably believed Hill could turn things around eventually, but he got even worse as the season went along. Find me one single sane person that is suggesting offering Hill arbitration? You can't because you're the only one.
You think I'm the author? Even AA has come out and suggested that the option of Hill being in Toronto long term is still there.
kwamebargnani wrote:You clearly have no idea how things work. He's gonna be a free agent at the end of the year, not arbitration eligible.
You didn't even know that this was Hill's arbitration year. I question that you know it all.kwamebargnani wrote:As for Olivo, he isn't particularly good, but at least he is good enough to start for several teams in marjor league level. He also happens to be a catcher with passable defense and offense. Also his previous salary was 2m. Reasonable for a borderline starter. If Olivo was to accept the arbitration offer, AA would still be able to trade him. Same can't be said for Hill.
Olivo production had nothing to do with this trade. It was all about the Type B draft pick. AA seen value in getting Olivo not for his ability. But for his ability to get a pick.kwamebargnani wrote:I'm just baffled how anyone can think paying 5M to Hill is anything but an atrocious idea.
You make it sound like offering arbitration to Hill is on the level of Wells contract.kwamebargnani wrote:You're saying: AA should offer Hill arbitration which would be 5m+, hopefully he declines and we get a pick! And if he doesn't, he's still an asset who plays everyday!
I'm saying: AA is not a moron who would waste 5m on a bench scrub that Hill has become. If Hill receives arbitration offer, he'd be crazy not to accept it, especially when it's unclear whether or not he's gonna be able to get a major league contract in the offseason, let alone 5m contract. Not even Ed Wade is that stupid. Then what happens when he accepts? we're stuck with $5m dead weight.
What I'm saying is this that AA will offer Hill arbitration. His reason is based on current assets and availability of free agents.
At this point we don't have anybody worthy of starting at second base. Not JMac. If they wanted him to start, they would and do as you have suggest and just let Hill walk right? Or at least bench him.
Nobody in the minors for the time being. Adeiny Hechavarria isn't ready and won't be MLB ready til 2013 or late 2012 at the earliest. Escobar will likely be moved over to 2nd at that point. AH will be starting once he gets here.
In terms of option of FA, what are you going to do? Sign a more elite player? They would want 3 yrs minimum. That wouldn't go with the plan for AH. Sign a scrub for a yr? Is that really a better option than Hill?
Going to arbitration with Hill isn't going to break the bank. With 7-8 other hitting positions filled, having Hill as the second basemen next year with AH getting ready isn't going to be the nightmare you suggest.
The thread is about replacing Hill. I'm saying that with the options available, the chance to get a pick, it isn't as likely as you think it is.
But if you disagree, what better options do we have?