youreachiteach wrote:I fairly sure he started at least once against the Jays earlier on...they did move him back and forth from the pen (ie., he wasn't just a reliever)--and just because the runs he gave up might not have been earned, I'm not senile, he did do the same thing. Maybe it was 3 or four innings. As I say, it was several years ago. I have also watched him pitch quite a bit because he played for Seattle when I was in Korea, which gets the Japanese channel. They show A LOT of Mariners games because of Ichiro.
But he didn't.
Also, against the Jays, he has given up 1 HIT! in his career. in 7 1/3 innings. But yes, 6 walks in THOSE 7 odd inning is terrible, no one is denying that. But that has nothing to do with him being a starter, cause he's never started against the Jays.
So, it might have been against another team, but in any event, that's not really my point, is it. Just to reiterate: Morrow has a problem because he becomes pretty obvious after the first few innings and won't throw his change up nearly enough. And that will continue to get him tagged for the big inning until that changes. Good job going off on a minor tangential point, though.
Yep. Could have been another team. I wasn't trying to make this a big deal, just was pointing out that Morrow has never started against the jays. And I doubt he's ever gone past 1 inning versus the jays, let alone 3 1/3. 8 Games - 7 1/3 innings.
It was several years ago and might not have technically been recorded as a start--I don't know. But he has always had that same problem with Seattle--which is why they gave up on him in the first place. Did you think he was available because the Mariners are idiots?
And the reason it wasn't "technically" recorded as a start, was because he didn't start. Wait? Do you even know what Seattle did with him or do you just like making stuff up?
Firstly, he only had 15 starts with Seattle in a span of 2 years. His second year in the league, he had 5 starts at the end of year. And his third year in the league, he had 10 starts to end the year. Both times, he started AS A RELIEVER, and ended the campaign as a starter. So you're going to tell me, 15 games as a starter is all you need to see from a guy who was 24 at the time with THAT arm? When you're trying to stretch him out as a starter mid-season?
Pitchers need a full spring training to get stretched out and you're asking a 23-24 year old to do it midseason. His last 4 starts as a Seattle Mariners was 23 2/3innings 2.66 ERA. Since that's the ONLY stat that matters to you. And what did they trade him for? A reliever (a damn good one at that), but still. You traded 70 innings at best, for a guy who has A++ stuff at age 24 and can be a starter. So are the Mariners idiots? In this case, yes they were. You do not trade a starter with that kind of stuff for a reliever (unless you're a contending club and you're trading a kid for a guy who can win you a championship this year).
Also, 6 walks to 11 strikeouts sucks. Like Morrow said himself ..."every inning I was here I was in a 3-2 count". He's always lived on the edge and required too many damn pitches to finish hitters off. There's only so many "got him looking" strikeouts you're going to get.
Again, those 6 walks/11Ks are in 7 1/3 relief appearances. I do agree with the fact that he does need too many pitches to finish hitters off. But that's with any guy who Ks a bunch.
Morrow has wonderful stuff. No one doubts that. But he needs another pitch. Yes, the 12 strikeouts are great. But having a guy who averages 6 innings--FINE by your own admission, is not a top starter. Which is what I said. You countered with XFIP, which has nothing to do with what actually happens when he pitches, only the result. We get it: Morrow is an XFIP dream. He strikes everybody out. No chance of the ball getting to the outfield there! But if he is so excellent, why does his ERA suck ****?
Morrow needs another pitch. On days when **** teams or a liberal ump help him out, he'll avoid the big inning barely (just like he did tonight). On days when better hitting ballclubs make him pay for his two dimensional game--he'll get beat like a rented mule lke the Red Sox did to him.
Those "stats" are HUGE in baseball. It helps explain long-term success potential for a guy. It's possible a guy could be getting unlucky. It happens. Those bloop hits, those groundballs that get through, those double plays not turned. As for another pitch. 100% agree that he needs it. He's getting by on 2-pitches at the moment and is a
very good pitcher. If he wants to be a GREAT pitcher, he needs a third pitch. Whether it be that slow curve, or a changeup. Either one will do the trick; but he needs it. Especially when he can't throw 98 anymore and needs three (to four) different pitches to get hitters out.
Whether you like it or not, or would like to believe or not. You need to be able to K batters, or be an extreme groundball pitcher to be effective in the ML (along with control). Morrow has always been a guy that can/will walk guys; so it's ultra important for him to be able to K guys or induce groundballs. And why is his ERA so high? That's what those stats are trying to explain; that sometimes it's just bad luck, but you don't wanna hear it.
As for him going 6 innings. We all know he started the year terribly ( you could say due to injury and the fact that he hadn't pitched in a while - remember he got shut down early last year). But in his last 12 starts, he's gone at least 6 innings in 10 of his last 12 starts; in 7 of 12, he went at least 7 innings.
And really, that Baltimore start was unfair to him. Yunel botched the double play, and that means extra pitches, dangerous hitter at the plate, but since it was a close game, you pitch more carefully. He makes that double play; Adam Jones comes on the next inning with nobody on; and we win that game. Blue Jays defense screwed him TWICE that game. Yet, he still went 7 2/3 innings in that game.
In conclusion, Brandon Morrow is not an Ace. But he has ace-like stuff. He is one average pitch away from being a GREAT pitcher. He can be a great pitcher on any given night, but consistency haunts him and that is because of a lack of a third pitch and the fact that some nights he can't locate. However, to say that he has failed as a starter? Not even close. He's been solid and on some nights, absolutely spectacular. You don't judge a starting pitcher until the end of year 3 (not with that kind of arm -Brad Mills is a different story [he should be DFA/traded to a team in the NL]). This is only year 2 (as a starter - please don't bring up Seattle and with the stupidity they handled him), and he still hasn't been stretched out fully to go 200 innings year in and year out. To me, I've seen flashes of the changeup and flashes of the curve ball. If he can come in next year, and truly locate those pitches or be able to throw it with confidence on those 1-2, 2-2 counts, it'll really shorten the innings for him and he'll be able to throw more innings game in and game out. That's how close he is to being an ELITE pitcher. For some, it never happens, but as a Jays fan, you hope it does; because he you see flashes of brilliance, even with only two pitches...