ImageImageImageImageImage

Why did we trade Marcum?

Moderator: JaysRule15

wicked_crossova
General Manager
Posts: 9,713
And1: 3,442
Joined: Jun 22, 2006

Why did we trade Marcum? 

Post#1 » by wicked_crossova » Tue Jun 21, 2011 6:20 pm

He was one of (if not the) the most consistent pitchers we had last year, he's KILLING it this year (yeahyeah NL), and he's only 29. It didn't make sense to me then and it sure as hell doesnt make sense to me now.
s e n s i
RealGM
Posts: 17,098
And1: 3,629
Joined: Mar 19, 2008
Location: Toronto
       

Re: Why did we trade Marcum? 

Post#2 » by s e n s i » Tue Jun 21, 2011 6:37 pm

we got a cant-miss prospect that has been destroying pitchers in every league he has ever played in, and will be a mainstay at 3rd base for years. we all liked marcum too, but these are the types of trades, risks, you have to take to get better and stay better.

obviously it doesn't help that our rotation hasn't been lights out, but a prime romero, morrow, drabek, cecil will be good enough to pitch this team into contention imo. lawrie fills a major hole at 3rd and likely at the top half of the order in his prime. he will be more valuable in his prime than marcum would have been.
galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.

Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).
augustine
Senior
Posts: 505
And1: 29
Joined: Oct 17, 2006

Re: Why did we trade Marcum? 

Post#3 » by augustine » Tue Jun 21, 2011 6:41 pm

Because we have five quality starting pitchers younger than him that are major league ready and have better raw stuff (Morrow, Romero, Cecil, Stewart, Drabek). And, beyond this we have three other quality starting pitchers younger than him that are major league ready with comparable raw stuff (Reyes, Villaneuva, litsch). Beyond that, we have plenty more quality starting pitchers younger than him that are not quite major league ready but have better raw stuff (McGowan, Alvares, McGuire, etc...).

On the other hand, our third base situation consists of E5, who had 8 errors in about twenty games, who lost his job to Jayson Nix, a journeyman who was dropped from another teams 40 man roster. Jayson Nix, in turn is hitting about .190. We had no viable third basemen in the system (Emaus? No). So, why not fill this position of need with a 21 year old that was raking in AAA and experts are now ranking in the top 5 or 10 prospects in all of baseball.
Hoopstarr
RealGM
Posts: 22,274
And1: 10,300
Joined: Feb 21, 2006
     

Re: Why did we trade Marcum? 

Post#4 » by Hoopstarr » Tue Jun 21, 2011 7:03 pm

The reasoning was that Marcum presented the most potential returning value for a player who wasn't "off limits". Especially among our pitchers, where we were and still are pretty loaded with starters for a rebuilding team. Marcum was a guy who 1. was coming off a great season, 2. presented injury risk (more than the usual starter), 3. was at the sweet spot in his service timeline where he'd given us our money's worth and then become attractive to buyers because he was under control for two more years, and 4. the Jays had always prized Lawrie going back to the draft when they just missed out on him.
User avatar
-MetA4-
Head Coach
Posts: 6,902
And1: 548
Joined: May 28, 2003
Location: London

Re: Why did we trade Marcum? 

Post#5 » by -MetA4- » Tue Jun 21, 2011 7:19 pm

Marcum struggled against AL East opposition. He's a great pitcher, but Boston and New York eat pitchers like him up. If you've paid any attention Anthopolous has preached adding more traditional power pitchers that pitch off of their fastballs.
User avatar
youngLion
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,207
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Location: Toronto

Re: Why did we trade Marcum? 

Post#6 » by youngLion » Tue Jun 21, 2011 7:59 pm

Well aside from the fact that the team got a star prospect back, wasn't one of the biggest issues his service time? The Jays had less control over Marcum than any of their other starters, so between that and the wealth of SP depth in the minors Marcum was the guy who made the most sense to trade. It's a cliché, but you have to give something to get something, and aside from the draft there's no way to get a guy like Lawrie without giving up something good.
Image
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,459
And1: 17,977
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: Why did we trade Marcum? 

Post#7 » by Schad » Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:12 pm

Hoopstarr wrote:The reasoning was that Marcum presented the most potential returning value for a player who wasn't "off limits". Especially among our pitchers, where we were and still are pretty loaded with starters for a rebuilding team. Marcum was a guy who 1. was coming off a great season, 2. presented injury risk (more than the usual starter), 3. was at the sweet spot in his service timeline where he'd given us our money's worth and then become attractive to buyers because he was under control for two more years, and 4. the Jays had always prized Lawrie going back to the draft when they just missed out on him.


Yup. And while Marcum was a very good pitcher, I'd rather have a 21 year old who independent evaluators have called a superstar-in-waiting, rather than a good 29 year old starting pitcher with somewhat worrisome mechanics.
Image
**** your asterisk.
Michael Bradley
General Manager
Posts: 9,444
And1: 2,142
Joined: Feb 25, 2004

Re: Why did we trade Marcum? 

Post#8 » by Michael Bradley » Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:20 pm

I think the Jays actually undervalued Marcum at the time, and I said as much. Lawrie busting out and (hopefully) sticking at 3B lessens that a bit, but a super affordable 3.5 WAR starter who had a 3.72 ERA from 2007-2010 pitching in the AL East is pretty darn good. As you can see by how Drabek, Cecil, etc, have done this season, there is no such thing as a guaranteed pitching prospect. Good teams hold on to the Shaun Marcum's of the world until they become too expensive for what they produce (which Marcum wasn't in our case). Really the only negative with Marcum is injury concern, not so much with his history (he's only had TJS and no other real significant injury to my knowledge), but moreso his mechanics and delivery. That is really a judgment call.

It wasn't a bad trade by any stretch, and if Lawrie pans out then no one in Jays land will remember Marcum a few years from now, but I think fans were really sleeping on how good Marcum is/was. Then again, can't really complain with Lawrie + Villanueva as the return (I'm guessing that deal will just combine with each other eventually).
User avatar
Duffman100
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 47,799
And1: 72,150
Joined: Jun 27, 2002
   

Re: Why did we trade Marcum? 

Post#9 » by Duffman100 » Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:21 pm

Brett Lawrie.

That is all.
User avatar
xAIRNESSx
RealGM
Posts: 18,516
And1: 13,930
Joined: Jan 06, 2005
       

Re: Why did we trade Marcum? 

Post#10 » by xAIRNESSx » Wed Jun 22, 2011 4:02 am

Maybe they were worried about his TJ surgery and some of the minor arm problems he had last season. I know I was. He seemed a little risky in that regard, but he's definitely tearing it up this season.
Image
User avatar
darth_federer
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 29,060
And1: 922
Joined: Apr 12, 2009
Contact:

Re: Why did we trade Marcum? 

Post#11 » by darth_federer » Wed Jun 22, 2011 4:50 am

Mustard called it before the season when he said that Marcum would kill it in the NL. We got a future star prospect out of the deal. No brainer IMO.
Image

Profanity wrote:This is why I question a Canadian team in our league. it's a govt conspiracy trina to sell all our milk to Russia. They let the raptors participate to not let canadians demand crossing taxes. it will backfire one day.
J Dilla
Banned User
Posts: 19,605
And1: 1,832
Joined: Apr 04, 2007
Location: Deeznuts

Re: Why did we trade Marcum? 

Post#12 » by J Dilla » Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:10 am

We clearly miss him, our pitching is brutal this year

From what I can remember Anthopolous traded Marcum in anticipation of a Grienke deal. He traded Marcum, Grienke joined him in Milwaukee, and here we are in this mess.

Good pitching is hard to find in this league

but we'll talk further once we find out how good Lawrie is.
User avatar
-MetA4-
Head Coach
Posts: 6,902
And1: 548
Joined: May 28, 2003
Location: London

Re: Why did we trade Marcum? 

Post#13 » by -MetA4- » Wed Jun 22, 2011 12:13 pm

J Dilla wrote:
From what I can remember Anthopolous traded Marcum in anticipation of a Grienke deal. He traded Marcum, Grienke joined him in Milwaukee, and here we are in this mess.


Not at all.

Marcum being traded was a pure baseball decision. Only (Please Use More Appropriate Word) media people were pushing the Greinke to Toronto rumors.
User avatar
aselvana
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,352
And1: 886
Joined: Jul 13, 2007
Location: the cold

Re: Why did we trade Marcum? 

Post#14 » by aselvana » Wed Jun 22, 2011 3:51 pm

J Dilla wrote:We clearly miss him, our pitching is brutal this year

From what I can remember Anthopolous traded Marcum in anticipation of a Grienke deal. He traded Marcum, Grienke joined him in Milwaukee, and here we are in this mess.

Good pitching is hard to find in this league

but we'll talk further once we find out how good Lawrie is.


good pitching is plentiful in the post-steroids era. Even Pat Gillick, once mentioned on a Jays Broadcast, when given two players with same qualities,projections; with the only difference is ones a pitcher and the other is a batter, he would take the batter.
How would you describe Raptors RGM forum in one sentence?
Steelo Green wrote:The one title shouldn’t excuse what was mediocrity all around it.
LBJSeizedMyID
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,547
And1: 96
Joined: Jul 22, 2009

Re: Why did we trade Marcum? 

Post#15 » by LBJSeizedMyID » Wed Jun 22, 2011 5:57 pm

Pitching is plentiful nowadays, with the league ERA at 3.80. Having Marcum in our lineup this year may have presented a handful more wins, but in reality, we'd still be roughly five games behind Boston.
AleksandarN
General Manager
Posts: 9,239
And1: 12,675
Joined: Aug 08, 2002

Re: Why did we trade Marcum? 

Post#16 » by AleksandarN » Thu Aug 25, 2011 5:44 am

hmm let me see...
User avatar
JYD
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 32,532
And1: 7,209
Joined: Aug 07, 2001
Location: NOT POSSIBLE! NOT POSSIBLE!

Re: Why did we trade Marcum? 

Post#17 » by JYD » Thu Aug 25, 2011 11:23 pm

Forgive me for being late to the party. I was a Jays fan growing up, but haven't really followed baseball in recent years. However I getting back into it and have been following the Jays lately.

We got Lawrie for Marcum? All I know is when I look at Lawrie, I see a beast stud. Marcum has the stuff of a good 3rd starter, no?
User avatar
Weems
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,640
And1: 95
Joined: May 24, 2010

Re: Why did we trade Marcum? 

Post#18 » by Weems » Thu Aug 25, 2011 11:45 pm

Marcum's stuff isn't electric, but it's good, and he changes speeds well and has excellent control of all of his pitches. His change up is among the best in the game and he throws it a lot. Can't go wrong with a good change up.

He can't go 7 innings every outing, but he's quite a ways better than a 3rd starter to me. Dunno.
User avatar
JYD
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 32,532
And1: 7,209
Joined: Aug 07, 2001
Location: NOT POSSIBLE! NOT POSSIBLE!

Re: Why did we trade Marcum? 

Post#19 » by JYD » Thu Aug 25, 2011 11:50 pm

Ok, so maybe a 2nd starter on a decent team. Still, a guy who can't go really deep in games and doesn't have great stuff is somewhat limited come playoff time typically.

I took one look at Lawrie with his strength and balance and hands and got goosebumps, almost.

Haven't watched the baseballs in some time but I've always had a good eye for baseball talent...Lawrie looks like a 15-year face of the franchise type.
WpgPage
Rookie
Posts: 1,145
And1: 1
Joined: Mar 16, 2010

Re: Why did we trade Marcum? 

Post#20 » by WpgPage » Thu Aug 25, 2011 11:56 pm

Hes a 3rd starter on a playoff team, kinda like in Milwaukee (a playoff team) hes the 3rd starter......hmmm. Funny how that works.

Return to Toronto Blue Jays