GrendonJennings wrote:While I agree, reddeye, that the poster made the Packers' list too deep, you can't use that 13-3 as a starting barometer. The Falcons caught a bunch of breaks and had an atrociously easy schedule. I'd have put them right in the top tier tied with the Saints, Packers, and Eagles if you take what happened in the playoffs out of the equation.
I also think Snelling is relatively boring. I realize he can handle all of the duties by catching, blocking, and running, but I like an explosive running back...and that he is not.
Other than one nice year rushing the ball 2 years back, Snelling is essentially Brandon Jackson plus a few pounds.
I think that is a big weakness if Turner is over the hill this year. Snelling is boring and Jacquizz Rodgers can only do so much with his size. They go from RB being a position of strength in years past to not being very good at it at all.
I don't think the Falcons schedule was that much easier than the Packers and their schedule this year doesn't look that hard either. I wasn't trying to use the 13-3 as a starting point. Just to show they were a good team that added some talent.
I just don't see it as ridiculous to pick Atlanta as a Super Bowl team. I think GB, Atl, NO and Philly are all in about the same range as far as the Super Bowl goes.