RealGM Top 100 List #41

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,285
And1: 9,850
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

RealGM Top 100 List #41 

Post#1 » by penbeast0 » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:43 am

Criteria: Take into account both peak and career play, era dominance, impact on the game of basketball, and how well their style of play and skills would transcend onto different eras. To be more exact, how great they were at playing the game of basketball.

Voting Will End In 2 Days (Monday 9/12) at 10PM EST

Please vote and nominate

Newest addition:

Alonzo Mourning
Image
NBA Championship 2006
1x All-NBA 1st Team
1x All-NBA 2nd Team
2x Defensive Player of the Year
2x All-Defense 1st Team
7x All-Star


Bob Cousy
Image
Hall of Fame 1971
MVP 1957
10x All-NBA 1st Team
2x All-NBA 2nd Team
6x NBA Champion
13x All-Star

Chris Paul
Image
1x1st Team All-NBA
1x2nd Team All-NBA
1x3rd Team All-NBA
1x1st Team All-Defense
2x2nd Team All-Defense
Rookie of the Year 2006
5xAll-Star


Reggie Miller
Image
3x3rd Team All-NBA
5xAll-Star

Willis Reed
Image
2x NBA Champion
Hall of Fame 1982
MVP (1970)
1x All-NBA 1st Team
4x All-NBA 2nd Team
1x All-Def 1st Team
7x All-Star
Rookie of the Year (1965)

Allen Iverson
Image
MVP (2001)
3x All-NBA 1st Team
3x All-NBA 2nd Team
1x All-NBA 3rd Team
11x All-Star
Rookie of the Year (1996)

Dave Cowens
Image
Hall of Fame 1991
2x NBA Champion
MVP 1973
3x All-NBA 2nd Team
1x All-Def 1st Team
2x All-Def 2nd Team
Rookie of the Year 1971
7x All-Star


Elvin Hayes
Image
Hall of Fame (1990)
NBA Champion (1978)
3× All-NBA First Team Selection
3× All-NBA Second Team Selection
2x All-Defense Second Team Selections
12× All-Star

Dominique Wilkins
Image
Hall of Fame (2006)
1x All-NBA 1st Team
4x All-NBA 2nd Team
2x All-NBA 3rd Team
9x All-Star
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,285
And1: 9,850
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #41 

Post#2 » by penbeast0 » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:49 am

oting Candidates
We have two PGs on the board. Chris Paul has only played 5 years in the NBA and only 2 really peak years but those two were as impressive as any small guard who has ever played in the NBA. Bob Cousy, on the other hand, has 6 rings, 10 1st team All-NBA awards, an MVP, and was the games first great playmaker (Bob Davies possibly excepted). Paul's peak is so short it is hard to pick him over one of the all-time greats like Cousy but he's better offensively, defensively, and doesn't have his efficiency fall off a cliff in the playoffs as Cousy did in so many championship seasons.

Allen Iverson and Reggie Miller couldn't be more unalike as scorers. Iverson the super high volume, inefficient, undersized, bad practice, streetball superstar with accolades and endorsements everywhere; Miller the superefficient, come off of screens, playoff assassin with only 5 All-Star games in his long career and never better than 3rd team All-NBA. Neither were much defensively nor was Dominique Wilkins who is sort of Iverson-lite with a good attitude (not terribly efficient or versatile and a poor defender but a great scorer for a long time). I lean to Reggie for efficiency and playoff power.

Then you have the bigs. Cowens and Reed were early 70s stars with reasonably short careers and not great stats but who were recognized as MVP's for their leadership and hard nosed play. Alonzo Mourning is similar but without the championships. Elvin Hayes is stronger statistically than any of them and also a 70s champion although known as a whiner more than a leader.

Impressive posts on both Reggie Miller and Dominique Wilkins have both in my sights (which I would not have said about Nique before this project) but Hayes, while not as impressive offensively, gives you the post defense and rebounding muscle that can help win championships.

Vote: Elvin Hayes

I am really close to voting Reggie Miller, just don't ever remember him dominating guys to the extent that Hayes did but those playoff numbers may be enough by themselves to put him in here.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,285
And1: 9,850
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #41 

Post#3 » by penbeast0 » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:52 am

For the nomination:

PG -- It is between Kevin Johnson who was a very solid player in all respects though often injured, the surprisingly efficient Chauncey Billups, and possibly Lenny Wilkens from the 60s or the purely offensive Nate Archibald or Pete Maravich from the 70s. I lean to KJ for his all around game.

Wings -- On the wings, there are still great scorers left . . . I like Alex English's consistency and Ray Allen's 3 point shooting over the more spectacular but less consistent Bernard King, Mark Aquirre, or David Thompson, or the statistically most efficient Adrian Dantley. Paul Arizin, Sam Jones, and Hal Greer also should come into play reasonably soon --

Defensively, I love Moncrief (and Dumars and Bobby Jones have a shot too but Moncrief was the most dominant at his peak) though the shortness of his peak (5 years then a major falloff) is a big issue.

Big Men -- The bigs left all have some issue with their games. Neil Johnston and Mel Daniels played against inferior competition during their primes and were more limited besides. Bob McAdoo while his 5 year peak is spectacular, didn't play big man defense and his teams didn't dominate; Bob Lanier and Walt Bellamy had nice numbers but their teams weren't that much either and Detroit with Lanier sucked defensively for 9 of Lanier's 10 prime years which I consider pretty bad. Finally there is Dikembe Mutombo who was a great shot blocker and consistent player for years. Finally, Bill Walton had one great year (not that much better than Wes Unseld's MVP year) but every other year he broke down and left the Portland and San Diego teams which had built around him destroyed until he made another 1 year comeback as a top reserve. I wouldn't choose a one in eight shot at catching lightning in a bottle at the expense of a virtually guaranteed team crash the other seven over most of the above named players.

At PF, Bobby Jones and Dennis Rodman may be the greatest pair of defensive forwards but Jones, while extremely efficient, didn't score or rebound that much while Rodman had no offense and for 1/2 his career, left his man at times to pad his rebounding stats at the team's expense. On the offensive end, Amare Stoudamire and Chris Webber just have too many issues to rank above Jones or Rodman. Actually comparing these guys to the other big men left, I would have to suck it up and go with Rodman despite my dislike for what he did in San Antonio. He's a punk but his rebounding is GOAT level and his post defense excellent (earlier in his career he defender out on the floor well too but he gave up doing that to pad his rebounding totals, another reason I don't like him . . . but it's hard to argue with his level of success).

Let me explain why I am voting for Sidney Moncrief here. His peak is short, only 5 full years from 82-86 and those years coincided with the peak years of both the Bird/McHale/Parish/DJ Celtics and of the Moses/Erving/Toney/Cheeks Sixers (as well as the Showtime Lakers) so he never made it past the ECF but in those peak years he led Milwaukee, a Don Nelson coached team with no consistent center, to be one of the best defensive and an above average offensive team. Individually he was a consistent 20ppg scorer with excellent passing and rebounding skills who is widely considered the greatest man-up perimeter defender to ever play winning the first two ever awarded DPOY awards in this 5 year stretch.

Milwaukee's leaguewide ratings, even in those years of great dynastic teams, were

82 Moncrief 6.7reb/4.8ast/19.8pts on .601ts% incredible for a guard before wide use of the 3pt shot
9th in offense, 1st! in defense -- Marques Johnson was the second star only scoring 16ppg, center was good offense, mediocre defensive aging Bob Lanier, the other biggest minutes were PG Quinn Buckner (excellent defender) and Brian Winters (offense only pure jump shooter)

93 Moncrief 5.8reb/3.9ast/22.5pts on .602ts% 1st DPOY award (82 was actually better defense)
10th in offense, 6th in defense -- Marques Johnson had a great year, Alton Lister replaced Bob Lanier

94 Moncrief 6.7reb/4.5ast/20.9pts on .591ts% 2nd DPOY award
12th in offense, 2nd in defense -- Lanier came back to split time with Lister and Marques's last year

95 Moncrief 5.4reb/5.2ast/21.7pts on .594ts%
6th in offense, 2nd in defense -- Terry Cummings took over for Marques as the other star, Lister split time with Randy Breuer at center, 3pt specialist Craig Hodges split time with Paul Pressey and Junion Bridgeman

96 Moncrief 4.6reb/4.9ast/20.2pts on .604ts%
4th in offense, 2nd in defense -- Breuer became the starter still splitting time, Pressey as point forward

Moncrief was an incredible two way player. In a slightly weaker era, he might have led his team to one or two championships like a Chauncey Billups or Isiah Thomas but the one year they beat the Celtics (with great performance by Sid), they then ran into the "fo fo fo" Sixer team. But he was the clearly acknowledged leader of Milwaukee teams and led them to terrific defensive performances despite average defensive big men (Cummings doesn't have a good rep but is underrated but before him the starter was journeyman Mickey Johnson though Don Nelson liked to use Marques Johnson as PF and play 3 guards more than using Johnson).



NOMINATE: Sidney Moncrief
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 41,012
And1: 27,893
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #41 

Post#4 » by Fencer reregistered » Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:35 am

I'm going to tentatively vote for Reggie Miller. It's pretty consistent with my early support for Paul Pierce -- consistent guy, efficient offensive, would be a good offensive contributor on almost any team, led a bunch of not-so-great teams, was on good-enough defensive teams that he should get some defensive benefit of the doubt, etc.

Pierce is the better player by far -- more versatile on offense and more capable on defense. But Reggie's awesome longevity narrows the overall gap a bit.

Truth be told, I don't know a lot about the 1970s big men, and am wimping out a bit about wrapping my mind around what I think of them. More precisely, I don't have a firm grasp on how to sort out NBA/ABA/expansion/drugs/questionable contemporary accolades/most guys showing poor longevity.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,188
And1: 22,199
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #41 

Post#5 » by Doctor MJ » Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:50 am

Thinking on how to express why I prefer Miller to Hayes, and why I'm not that high on Hayes in general.
Hayes was essentially a guy who did the big man volume scoring thing to some degree of success and the big man defender thing to some degree of success. He's thus doing more things we can quantify directly than someone like Miller. But consider this:

Hayes was essentially a 15 TRB% guy and 3 BLK% guy. He had one TRB% year at 19, and a couple earlier in his career we don't have data for, but afte rthat he never broke 17, and broke 16 only 3 more times scattered in his career. We never saw him surpass 3.5 BLK%, maybe he could have by a bit in his first couple years when we don't have data.

How rare is such a player? Well in '10-11, we had 11 guys reach both of those marks who played more than 2000 minutes. 8 of those broke 16 & 4, 5 of those broke 17 & 5. So in other words, this combination is not at all rare. It's nice to have yes, but not something that would make us say someone is a star by any means.

Okay, then there's the scoring. Hayes is typically a 20 PPG guy on utterly horrendous efficiency. Yes he scored in higher volume his first few years, but again, he did it inefficiently, and he did it on unsuccessful teams. On good teams he's not a 25 PPG guy by any means. To me it literally goes without saying that such player is not a scoring star. In most situations, I don't even want someone scoring the ball like that.

So to me neither his scoring volume, nor his rebounding/defense is way above replacement. All that really stands out is that he played HUGE minutes for a REALLY long time. The REALLY long time part Miller has too, while filling a far harder to fill niche at the level he does.

The HUGE minutes part I have a hard time really weighting. I mean, I can't imagine ever playing a guy 45 MPG in the modern game, so what does that even get me with Hayes?
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
ElGee
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,041
And1: 1,207
Joined: Mar 08, 2010
Contact:

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #41 

Post#6 » by ElGee » Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:08 am

vote: Reggie Miller
nominate: Bob Lanier

First, the in/out runs I have for Lanier:

76 (12g) +2.4 to -2.3
77 (19g) +4.2 to -0.1
78 (18g) +5.3 to -0.1
79 (29g) +0.3 to -2.6
81 (13g) +2.0 to 7.6

What's of note to me is the defense:
76 -5.5 ppg with Lanier
77 -1.0 ppg
78 +8.9 ppg
79 +2.0 ppg
81 -2.8 ppg

We don't know about changes in pace, but what I see with my eyes is a mediocre defensive center, and that doesn't seem to contradicted with those numbers. And that's really the knock on Lanier, because otherwise he was an excellent offensive player. So what about the seasonal trends of his teams?

1970 Detroit, before Lanier arrives: -4.3 Defense (2nd worst in league) and +1.4 offense
1971 Lanier arrives: -1.7 Defense, +1.0 Offense
1972 -4.4 Def -1.6 Off

72 was the first year Lanier was an all-star, jumping his TS% nearly 4 points and going from a 25 mpg player to 39 mpg, 26 ppg and 14 rpg (3 apg too).
73 is the first time Lanier makes a blip on the MVP screen:

1973 -1.6 Def +1.9 Off

So it's plausible, just from a cursory glance, that Lanier isn't really all that bad defensively and he just had poor defensive help around him. Now, we expect our great defenders to show more impact than that over multiple runs and clearly Lanier isn't that, but I do think some treat his defense a little too negatively. Offensively, I'm a big fan of higher post players who can pass and shoot, and that's certainly Dobber. His peak in 1974

1974 +3.9 Def, -0.1 Off

Woah Woah Woah. Bill Lanier almost wins MVP and the big change is on defense. Again, I don't see Lanier as a negative defender. Offensively he's 23 ppg 55% TS 4.2 apg. Dave Bing is there for offense - I'm not comfortable with guys like Adams, Trapp, Mengelt and Norwood to comment on their contributions to I won't delve deeper (would love to learn). During the RPOY I remember 74 Lanier constantly being praised for how well he played against the other top centers of the time (including Kareem).

1975 -2.0 Def, +0.6 Off
1976 -1.9 Def, +0.9 Off

That number was good enough for 5th in the league on offense in 75 and 4th in 76. Of course Dave Bing is gone by 1976, and I think that speaks well to Lanier, especially given the drop in ppg in the games without him. 1977 he's loved again by voters and finishes 4th in MVP despite missing 18g:

1977 -1.8 Def, +0.8 Off

Not bad heavy lifting (if we are giving Lanier credit for making them .500 as in/out suggests) given that his top minute guys were ML Carr, Howard Porter (?), Chris Ford. Some nice names off the bench at least...

So overall, I think that's a pretty darn solid peak in 1974. Maybe even one of the best remaining ones for guys with some longevity...which is Lanier's other strength here. I even think there might be some merit in those early Milwaukee years, although he was more of a role player (and an injured one at that). But note that in 1980 he averaged 19-94 on 52% FG in the PS for the Bucks and 18-7-4 on 59% FG the following playoffs.

I'm open to changing my view on him, but he was a pretty darn good offensive center from everything I've seen. If I change my tune on Lanier, I'm going to make the leap and nominate Bill Walton.
Check out and discuss my book, now on Kindle! http://www.backpicks.com/thinking-basketball/
ElGee
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,041
And1: 1,207
Joined: Mar 08, 2010
Contact:

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #41 

Post#7 » by ElGee » Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:17 am

OK so I was planning on voting Hayes very soon, and Doc's argument is actually quite compelling in rethinking him. From the RPOY, I had his peak in 1977 (voted him 4th that year) and hold it in the same ballpark as Marques' peak or maybe even Bob Lanier's or Zo's.

I'm not sure I should give Hayes *that* much credit though. He is a good eye-test player to me despite his consistent need to take ridiculous outside shots. There's a little Tracy McGrady in that 77 season as Hayes TS% spikes over 54%. Of course, it falls off in the PS...

Hayes finishes 3rd in MVP voting twice (neither year 77), so clearly I'm not as big on him as his contemporary reputation no doubt generated by his volume stats. I welcome more on E though, particularly from you Beast.
Check out and discuss my book, now on Kindle! http://www.backpicks.com/thinking-basketball/
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,285
And1: 9,850
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #41 

Post#8 » by penbeast0 » Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:22 am

Since you clearly have more work with advanced stats than I do, care to calculate Wes Unseld's MVP year v. Bill Walton's MVP year . . . I expect Walton's to be better (he looked better on the eye test) but each has an MVP and a Finals MVP, 1 ring, were both good rebounding and defensive centers with great passing skills that (in their MVP years) were solid but not outstanding scorers . . . Walton was better both in scoring and help defense but he only helped for 1 year (and 1 as a reserve), every other year he broke down and destroyed his team for the playoffs whereas Unseld had a lot of knee problems but they were ones he could play through and he did, helping the Bullets to the best record in the 70s with 3 finals appearances and 1 ring.

And, while we are at it, how about the other players I am considering . . . Rodman, Arizin, and KJ (I have your opinion on English and Billups already).
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,188
And1: 22,199
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #41 

Post#9 » by Doctor MJ » Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:37 am

LG, curious your thoughts Lanier vs McAdoo. Obviously Lanier's got the longevity going for him. Is that why give him the nod, or is there more to it?
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,188
And1: 22,199
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #41 

Post#10 » by Doctor MJ » Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:38 am

And yes

Vote: Reggie Miller

Still an open mind on the nomination side.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,467
And1: 16,055
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #41 

Post#11 » by therealbig3 » Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:50 am

Vote: Miller
Nominate: KJ

I'm curious, if Lanier at best is not a negative on defense, which means his value comes from his offense...was he a better offensive player than KJ? Because if not, how does he go ahead of KJ?
User avatar
ronnymac2
RealGM
Posts: 11,004
And1: 5,074
Joined: Apr 11, 2008
   

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #41 

Post#12 » by ronnymac2 » Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:53 am

Nice post on Lanier, ElGee. He does indeed have a strong peak, and he's got nice playoff performances as well. His MIL years were nice as well. He was the enforcer, the guy who clogged the paint and gave the Bucks a chance against Moses and Kareem. His jumper allowed Milwaukee's ultra-athletes to slash at will.

Side note: Those Bucks are one of the most athletic run/jump teams I've ever seen. I've love to watch them against 2007 Golden State.


Does Elvin Hayes look like a 1970s version of Jermaine O'Neal to anybody? Hayes has much better longevity and played more minutes. O'neal was the slightly better passer and wasn't a douchebag.

Very happy Alonzo is in. His year 2000 was special, and it's only because of Shaq's GOAT season that Alonzo's year gets unfairly overlooked. Nevermind that Zo was all-nba first team a year earlier ahead of Shaquille.


Doc MJ: You asked me why I voted Nique over Miller in the last thread and I didn't have a chance to respond.

Well, I think Nique was a top-five player for like, two seasons. And in a competitive era. I don't think Reggie ever was. Reggie's best year to me was 2000, and despite it being a weaker year (aside from super-Shaq and special-Zo), Reggie wasn't a top five player. Now obviously that doesn't mean much since each year, the competition changed, and Nique and Reggie never really faced off against each other in the same year.

However...I do think peak Nique gives me a better chance of coming out ahead against teams led by other awesome players than peak Reggie does. Nique might not have Reggie's longevity, but it's not like he's Bernard King. Wilkins has some very good longevity as a star player.

It's close, and I'm not going to vehemently argue with people who say Reggie>Nique, but I've got Nique ahead by a tiny bit.
Pay no mind to the battles you've won
It'll take a lot more than rage and muscle
Open your heart and hands, my son
Or you'll never make it over the river
JordansBulls
RealGM
Posts: 60,467
And1: 5,345
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #41 

Post#13 » by JordansBulls » Mon Sep 19, 2011 12:08 pm

Vote: Dominique Wilkins
Nominate: Anfernee Hardaway
Image
"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan
User avatar
rocopc
Pro Prospect
Posts: 877
And1: 72
Joined: Jul 17, 2006
Location: Buenos Aires
         

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #41 

Post#14 » by rocopc » Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:26 pm

Miller over Nique.....???? I dont understand that!!! Miller is a bit overrated here .... I think...????
"No dejes que tus pensamientos escapen de tu control"
drza
Analyst
Posts: 3,518
And1: 1,860
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #41 

Post#15 » by drza » Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:43 pm

Back in town, not mad that Mchale won the last one, interesting to me that Reggie looks like he's in the driver seat for this one. overjoyed that Zo finally got in but it leaves me with an interesting nomination since Zo has been my default nom forever now. Hopefully I get the chance to come back in later and get into this thread, but since I'm currently swamped trying to re-engage after traveling, I'll just put out my current votes then see how things go later:

Vote: Dominique Wilkins
Nominate: Manu Ginobili
Creator of the Hoops Lab: tinyurl.com/mpo2brj
Contributor to NylonCalculusDOTcom
Contributor to TYTSports: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTbFEVCpx9shKEsZl7FcRHzpGO1dPoimk
Follow on Twitter: @ProfessorDrz
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 41,012
And1: 27,893
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #41 

Post#16 » by Fencer reregistered » Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:44 pm

I'd been forgetting this a bit, but those Bucks teams were pretty good -- not Celtics/Lakers good, but good enough to deserve significant respect a level down from them.

I'll join Penbeast in nominating Squid.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,645
And1: 16,357
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #41 

Post#17 » by Dr Positivity » Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:17 pm

Vote Miller, though it does feel dirty that it looks like he'll get in before Allen is nominated, but whatev

Nominate KJ

I have KJ and Mourning as close on my ATL as players can get. Because one is PG and one is C, it's very hard to cross compare who is better, you know? It's sort of like a mini Nash vs Ewing question, whom I also have virtually tied. And they both go for the same amount of time. Two of the most underrated stars ever IMO.
Liberate The Zoomers
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,645
And1: 16,357
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #41 

Post#18 » by Dr Positivity » Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:19 pm

ronnymac2 wrote:Does Elvin Hayes look like a 1970s version of Jermaine O'Neal to anybody? Hayes has much better longevity and played more minutes. O'neal was the slightly better passer and wasn't a douchebag.


That seems like a very very good comparison
Liberate The Zoomers
drza
Analyst
Posts: 3,518
And1: 1,860
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #41 

Post#19 » by drza » Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:22 pm

Fencer reregistered wrote:I'd been forgetting this a bit, but those Bucks teams were pretty good -- not Celtics/Lakers good, but good enough to deserve significant respect a level down from them.

I'll join Penbeast in nominating Squid.


I remember those Bucks teams pretty vividly (considering it was 25 years ago) because Dr. J was my favorite player, and in his last couple of seasons it was always the Bucks that put them out of the playoffs. I had a special hate in my heart for that team, only slightly behind the venom that I had for the Celtics.

That said, in my memory there were 2 things that first jumped out at me about those teams: 1) I was young enough that Moncrief was the first "Sidney" I had ever heard of, and at first it confused me because I wanted to call him "Cindy". And 2) I remembered that team as being more Terry Cummings' team than Moncrief's, and Cummings hasn't been mentioned at all.

It was enough that I just did a quick perusal at B-R, and I realize now where my impression came from. There was no League Pass in those days, so most of the time that I saw the Bucks was in the postseason against the 76ers in '86 and '87, and by that point Cummings was taking the baton as the team leader.

Anyway, this was just an anecdote. No real argue for or against from me here. Just what I thought of when I saw your post.
Creator of the Hoops Lab: tinyurl.com/mpo2brj
Contributor to NylonCalculusDOTcom
Contributor to TYTSports: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTbFEVCpx9shKEsZl7FcRHzpGO1dPoimk
Follow on Twitter: @ProfessorDrz
ElGee
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,041
And1: 1,207
Joined: Mar 08, 2010
Contact:

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #41 

Post#20 » by ElGee » Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:34 pm

drza wrote:
Fencer reregistered wrote:I'd been forgetting this a bit, but those Bucks teams were pretty good -- not Celtics/Lakers good, but good enough to deserve significant respect a level down from them.

I'll join Penbeast in nominating Squid.


I remember those Bucks teams pretty vividly (considering it was 25 years ago) because Dr. J was my favorite player, and in his last couple of seasons it was always the Bucks that put them out of the playoffs. I had a special hate in my heart for that team, only slightly behind the venom that I had for the Celtics.

That said, in my memory there were 2 things that first jumped out at me about those teams: 1) I was young enough that Moncrief was the first "Sidney" I had ever heard of, and at first it confused me because I wanted to call him "Cindy". And 2) I remembered that team as being more Terry Cummings' team than Moncrief's, and Cummings hasn't been mentioned at all.

It was enough that I just did a quick perusal at B-R, and I realize now where my impression came from. There was no League Pass in those days, so most of the time that I saw the Bucks was in the postseason against the 76ers in '86 and '87, and by that point Cummings was taking the baton as the team leader.

Anyway, this was just an anecdote. No real argue for or against from me here. Just what I thought of when I saw your post.


Want to echo this - have seen two Bucks games on the NBATV offseason reruns recently and Cummings was way more active/impressive than any other Buck...so much so that I was thinking "do I need to consider Cummings in the top100 project at some point?"

And again, this is not to denigrate Squid (who I have right next to Marques, both coming up) but in 1985 he missed 9 games and the Bucks were +7.3 MOV (better without Squid by 0.5 points) and in 1986 they were +9.8 MOV without Squid, again better in his absence by 0.8 points.

In 1987, they took the Celtics to 7 games and with Squid out half the year were a +3.8 MOV team without him (0.3 point boost with Moncrief). Moncrief helped steady the ship in the 4th quarter in wins in Milwaukee according to the G7 broadcast, but seemed almost non-existent in that game. I didn't realize he averaged almost 20 in the 87 PS...it was really a team of Cummings, Pierce, John Lucas and tremendous depth/athleticism (Sikma, Pressey, Hodges' shooting).
Check out and discuss my book, now on Kindle! http://www.backpicks.com/thinking-basketball/

Return to Player Comparisons