RealGM Top 100 #48

Moderators: trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ

User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,863
And1: 16,408
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: RealGM Top 100 #48 

Post#61 » by Dr Positivity » Thu Oct 6, 2011 5:57 pm

Snakebites wrote:Lol....

Crazy how hard it is for some to accept that not everyone shares their view on his career up to this point.

Its not that people are just fighting him getting there specifically. Its that we really do believe those players should be placed ahead of him.


Yeah, it's not that we don't like Chris Paul. Everyone likes Chris Paul. I mean I just spent a few pages arguing for Melo, who is a player I actually don't like.

It's just that it doesn't pass the logic test really at all for Paul to go above Zo and KJ unless you think comparing prime Paul to prime KJ/Zo is like comparing Wade to Reggie Miller, or you think Paul is in the Bill Walton zone where most decent group of teammates, he's going to take to instant contention. And I just think that's giving prime KJ and Zo a really short stick considering their real stats are not much worse than Paul's and they proved they could anchor teams as good as Paul's best, with slightly more talent, but still. As for the second point, he has had a decent 77 Blazers type of cast and they haven't gotten past pretender, so I think the proof is in the pudding
Liberate The Zoomers
User avatar
lukekarts
Head Coach
Posts: 7,168
And1: 336
Joined: Dec 11, 2009
Location: UK
   

Re: RealGM Top 100 #48 

Post#62 » by lukekarts » Thu Oct 6, 2011 7:31 pm

therealbig3 wrote:JordansBulls and lukekarts, can you guys give some arguments for Worthy and Penny?

Because nobody else has even mentioned them yet, and I haven't actually seen an argument for them. As of right now, I have a hard time seeing their case against Hill and Johnson, who are the two main candidates for me.


The difficulty with Worthy is for his entire prime he played with Magic and Kareem, an already established duo of superstars. So, for the majority of his career he was never going to have the greatest of stat-lines, therefore you can't make a case for him based on stats. But he certainly had the talent, which he showed in college (NCAA Champ, Most Outstanding Player, 1st Team) & by getting drafted 1st overall.

The greatest knock you can have, or perhaps the greatest compliment, is that he was a true team player, he fitted in with the system but took over when he had to - and that's why he was called 'Big Game James'.

In the 1985 run, he averaged 21.5 ppg on 62.2% shooting; inc 23.7 its against Boston in the Finals.

In 1988, he got his first chance to really step up (40 year old Kareem was just a 14 pt 5 rebound guy). He averaged 22 / 7.4 / 4.4 vs the defensive Detroit Pistons in the Finals. 28 points 9 rebounds in Game 6… Triple Double: 36 points, 16 rebounds, 10 assists in game 7 & Finals MVP.

His career playoff average was +4ppg from his regular season average @ 21.1 points (54.4%). He was always efficient.

It's hard to say his peak was as great as Grant Hill's, because he never had a bad enough team around him to get the same offensive freedom. But he was a proven winner and he certainly had the talent to take over when his team needed him to. And what most people seem to forget is that he did lead the Lakers in playoff scoring in 87, 88 & 89, despite not leading scoring during the regular season, so come the playoffs he was the primary offensive weapon.
There is no consolation prize. Winning is everything.
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,863
And1: 16,408
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: RealGM Top 100 #48 

Post#63 » by Dr Positivity » Thu Oct 6, 2011 7:38 pm

@ Dr MJ

Comparing Melo to Amare is interesting because I think Amare is one example of APM underrating a player's impact. It's long held him as a player ranging from mediocore to negative, but the results differ pretty strongly - Both NY and the Phoenix had about a 10 W swing in caliber with Amare changing teams. The fact that both teams had a swing like that all but confirms Amare's value to me

Two other things, looking at the RAPM on this http://stats-for-the-nba.appspot.com/ranking

- Melo and Amare's offensive numbers are excellent. Since we're talking about Melo, he's at 3.0: I counted LBJ, Wade, Manu, Kobe, Paul, Nash, Dirk, Baron, Peja, Pierce, Kidd, Billups, Allen, Lawson, Deron, Jamison, Redd, Terry, Roy, Garnett as players at 3.0 or higher. So that's 18 guys, but Baron, Lawson, Terry's rankings look pretty questionable just from common sense, and there's a slight non overlap between recent players like Roy and primes half a decade ago like Peja. So actually, RAPM is almost right there with popular perception on Melo as a top 15 offensive player, it's certainly within variable range of top 10 to 15. The problem with Melo's RAPM is his defensive numbers are awful. But when I look at Melo, I see that's he's athletic enough to rotate hard and he's played on lots of respectable defensive teams. I'm concerned about Melo's d, but not that concerned. My view with offensive perimeter superstars is I want the best offensive player unless they're *brutal*, while defense can be covered elsewhere. I mean we did vote in George Gervin and Steve Nash a long time ago

- There's other rankings near Amare and Melo that I find... questionable. Tyson Chandler is below both even though his value has been apparant every place he's gone and left. Deron isn't higher than them and he's someone who just passes any eye/logic test for a player who should be positive impact. Ben Wallace and Joakim Noah are lower than them, Granger is below them, Luis Scola is barely positive, David West is at 0, Rondo is negative, Wes Matthews is negative, Haslem is very negative. If Melo and Amare were the only rankings that looked far off from my personal perspective (and the fact that they're actually still top 20/30 offensive players by RAPM means they aren't that far off) I'd be more inclined to believe it's right about Melo, but there is a whole swack of rankings that don't pass the logic test for me at all. We KNOW guys like Chandler, Wallace, Noah, Deron, Scola, Haslem, Rondo etc. have value and it's pretty clear to me that RAPM is just dead wrong on them
Liberate The Zoomers
drza
Analyst
Posts: 3,518
And1: 1,861
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: RealGM Top 100 #48 

Post#64 » by drza » Thu Oct 6, 2011 7:44 pm

The voting got a bit confusing since the last update, so this is my attempt at another vote count (adding and subtracting from RealBig3's original post):

Vote:

Mourning 5 (drza, Ronnymac, Fencer, JordansBulls, Dr. Mufasa)

Paul 4 (RealBig3, ElGee, DocMJ, Mystic)

KJ 2 (Snakebites, Colts18)

Moncrief (Penbeast)


Nominate:

Grant Hill 4 (Snakebites, RealBig3, Ronnymac, JordansBulls)

Rodman 4 (drza, Penbeast, Fencer, Mysticbb)

Pau Gasol 2 (Dr. Mufasa, Colts)

Marques 1 (ElGee)

Bernard King 1 (Doc MJ)

James Worthy 1 (Lukearts)


With Lukekarts having submitted a nomination, but not a vote. If anyone wants to double-check me, does that look right?
Creator of the Hoops Lab: tinyurl.com/mpo2brj
Contributor to NylonCalculusDOTcom
Contributor to TYTSports: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTbFEVCpx9shKEsZl7FcRHzpGO1dPoimk
Follow on Twitter: @ProfessorDrz
drza
Analyst
Posts: 3,518
And1: 1,861
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: RealGM Top 100 #48 

Post#65 » by drza » Thu Oct 6, 2011 7:48 pm

lukekarts wrote:
therealbig3 wrote:JordansBulls and lukekarts, can you guys give some arguments for Worthy and Penny?

Because nobody else has even mentioned them yet, and I haven't actually seen an argument for them. As of right now, I have a hard time seeing their case against Hill and Johnson, who are the two main candidates for me.


The difficulty with Worthy is for his entire prime he played with Magic and Kareem, an already established duo of superstars. So, for the majority of his career he was never going to have the greatest of stat-lines, therefore you can't make a case for him based on stats. But he certainly had the talent, which he showed in college (NCAA Champ, Most Outstanding Player, 1st Team) & by getting drafted 1st overall.

The greatest knock you can have, or perhaps the greatest compliment, is that he was a true team player, he fitted in with the system but took over when he had to - and that's why he was called 'Big Game James'.

In the 1985 run, he averaged 21.5 ppg on 62.2% shooting; inc 23.7 its against Boston in the Finals.

In 1988, he got his first chance to really step up (40 year old Kareem was just a 14 pt 5 rebound guy). He averaged 22 / 7.4 / 4.4 vs the defensive Detroit Pistons in the Finals. 28 points 9 rebounds in Game 6… Triple Double: 36 points, 16 rebounds, 10 assists in game 7 & Finals MVP.

His career playoff average was +4ppg from his regular season average @ 21.1 points (54.4%). He was always efficient.

It's hard to say his peak was as great as Grant Hill's, because he never had a bad enough team around him to get the same offensive freedom. But he was a proven winner and he certainly had the talent to take over when his team needed him to. And what most people seem to forget is that he did lead the Lakers in playoff scoring in 87, 88 & 89, despite not leading scoring during the regular season, so come the playoffs he was the primary offensive weapon.


That's an interesting breakdown of Worthy, and paints him in a different light. As I was reading, I found myself substituting "Ginobili" in for "Worthy" in many of your arguments and having the same general conclusions work. Since I personally think Ginobili probably should have been added in awhile ago before some of the players who got to cut their teeth/make their names on poor teams, being able to apply similar reasoning for Worthy makes him worth consideration in the near future, perhaps against his similar generational peers.
Creator of the Hoops Lab: tinyurl.com/mpo2brj
Contributor to NylonCalculusDOTcom
Contributor to TYTSports: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTbFEVCpx9shKEsZl7FcRHzpGO1dPoimk
Follow on Twitter: @ProfessorDrz
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,863
And1: 16,408
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: RealGM Top 100 #48 

Post#66 » by Dr Positivity » Thu Oct 6, 2011 7:53 pm

I double checked all 5 pages, drza's post is correct

I change my nomination to Grant Hill btw

I know it's debateable whether we should do this, change our votes and nominations according to the count at the end - But I figure our voting is so spread out that it's encouragable to do some instant run off voting and get closer to a consensus
Liberate The Zoomers
drza
Analyst
Posts: 3,518
And1: 1,861
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: RealGM Top 100 #48 

Post#67 » by drza » Thu Oct 6, 2011 7:58 pm

We actually forgot to count David Stern's votes/nominations from his list that he left. From his list (pg. 29 of the main Top 100 thread), DavidStern:

Votes: Bob Lanier

Nominates: Dennis Rodman
Creator of the Hoops Lab: tinyurl.com/mpo2brj
Contributor to NylonCalculusDOTcom
Contributor to TYTSports: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTbFEVCpx9shKEsZl7FcRHzpGO1dPoimk
Follow on Twitter: @ProfessorDrz
User avatar
TMACFORMVP
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,947
And1: 161
Joined: Jun 30, 2006
Location: 9th Seed

Re: RealGM Top 100 #48 

Post#68 » by TMACFORMVP » Thu Oct 6, 2011 8:14 pm

If a tiebreaker is needed for Hill/Rodman, I'd throw my nomination to Hill (did in the last thread anyway).
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,863
And1: 16,408
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: RealGM Top 100 #48 

Post#69 » by Dr Positivity » Thu Oct 6, 2011 8:16 pm

Correct

One final note on Melo's RAPM - 3 points is worth 8-10 Ws by pythagorean. So RAPM is essentially saying Melo is worth 8-10 wins offensively. It really just depends on how much you trust the defensive numbers it says. For me Melo is a neutral value defensive player. He doesn't help you, doesn't hurt you. He's just there. So from that perspective APM actually lines up pretty well with how I see Melo as a 7-11 W player on most teams
Liberate The Zoomers
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,423
And1: 9,951
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM Top 100 #48 

Post#70 » by penbeast0 » Thu Oct 6, 2011 8:37 pm

SORRY ABOUT THE DELAYS, SHOULD HAVE A WORKING COMPUTER AGAIN FRIDAY NIGHT


Vote:

Mourning 5 (drza, Ronnymac, Fencer, JordansBulls, Dr. Mufasa)

Paul 4 (RealBig3, ElGee, DocMJ, Mystic)

KJ 2 (Snakebites, Colts18)

Moncrief (Penbeast)

Bob Lanier (David Stern)


Nominate:

Grant Hill 6 (Snakebites, RealBig3, Ronnymac, JordansBulls, TMACFORMVP, Dr. Mufasa)

Rodman 5 (drza, Penbeast, Fencer, Mysticbb, David Stern)

Pau Gasol 1 ( Colts)

Marques 1 (ElGee)

Bernard King 1 (Doc MJ)

James Worthy 1 (Lukearts)
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
User avatar
lukekarts
Head Coach
Posts: 7,168
And1: 336
Joined: Dec 11, 2009
Location: UK
   

Re: RealGM Top 100 #48 

Post#71 » by lukekarts » Thu Oct 6, 2011 9:08 pm

If we want to conclusively put Zo through I'll add my vote to him too.
There is no consolation prize. Winning is everything.

Return to Player Comparisons