GM a Team - We're bored edition - Discussion

5th pick sucks · Post #401 » by **5th pick sucks** » Sat Oct 8, 2011 7:10 pm

Anyone need some depth? Looking to package Turiaf, Anthony, Brooks, AK-47, Lamb for an upgrade at SF. Get at me

SamBone · Post #402 » by **SamBone** » Sat Oct 8, 2011 9:21 pm

firesale in DC, EVERYONE must go

MJallday59 · Post #403 » by **MJallday59** » Sat Oct 8, 2011 10:20 pm

Change of direction in Boston!

Ricky Rubio is on the block

Mjallday59@yahoo.com

BlackIce · Post #404 » by **BlackIce** » Sat Oct 8, 2011 11:14 pm

New look Nuggets.

PG: Mo Williams/JJ Barea
SG: Eric Gordon/Jason Terry/Mickael Pietrus
SF: Nicolas Batum/CJ Miles/Bill Walker
PF: Blake Griffin/Lamar Odom
Cc: Roy Hibbert/Amir Johnson

Looking to move Amir Johnson for a more natural C. He is fine at that position but I wouldn't mind more size.

JoebobLollipop · Post #405 » by **JoebobLollipop** » Sat Oct 8, 2011 11:27 pm

The Los Angeles Clippers:

PG: Curry/Harris
SG: Allen/Fields
SF: Smith
PF: Morris
C: Bogut

Looking to either trade Harris or Curry for an upgrade at another postion

Warriorfan · Post #406 » by **Warriorfan** » Sun Oct 9, 2011 3:00 am

Okl Thunder

Joebernabe@yahoo.com
AIM somaseekerjb

On the block

C/PF Pau Gasol for younger all star and a true C.

RR9 · Post #407 » by **RR9** » Sun Oct 9, 2011 7:26 pm

MIA lineup:

cp3/delonte
jrich/tmac/satoransky
lbj/ghill
al jeff/kmart
okafor/camby

i'm looking for a more natural PF and defensive-oriented center for my front court.

everyone except lbj is available. needless to say, cp3 will be the toughest.

BlackIce · Post #408 » by **BlackIce** » Sun Oct 9, 2011 7:51 pm

Shopping a Terry/Odom/Williams package. Looking for value at any position, preferably youth.

MagicalMe · Post #409 » by **MagicalMe** » Sun Oct 9, 2011 8:27 pm

Still looking to move Jeff Green and any backcourt player (Thornton wouldn't be easy to get), for improving my back court.
Not looking to move my front court, unless i'm blown away.
ownager20@gmail.com

dan_atko97 · Post #410 » by **dan_atko97** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:32 am

so does that mean game is over?

-Kees- · Post #411 » by **-Kees-** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 10:27 am

^Yeah, what's the timeline here?

I thought we had till the 15th for trading

Warriorfan wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:Hypothetical new timeline:
Start Trading: August 31, 10PM EST
Free Agency 2011: September 5
End Free Agency 2011/beginning of season: September 19 (must be within roster limits)
End Trading: September 25
Playoff Rankings: September 26-27
Draft: September 28-October 2
Start Free Agency/Trading: October 3
End Free Agency: October 9
End Trading: October 15
Writeups: October 16 - October 19
Rankings: October 20 - 25
Conclusion: October 29

Adapted Schedule

Does this look good to everyone?

Also, when will we have that min signing period? I only have 6 guy on my NOH roster...

babyjax13 · Post #412 » by **babyjax13** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:42 pm

You may just send in offers to me, many players will sign for the minimum. I am changing the trade deadline to the 12th. I have midterms coming and won't have time to run the game next Wednesday - Friday.

babyjax13 · Post #413 » by **babyjax13** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:42 pm

Tomorrow at Midnight EST trading will be closed. I will still be taking offers for tier three free agents until that point. By Thursday midnight EST write-ups must be posted: copy and pasting your roster will be acceptable, however it will probably help you in the rankings to provide some commentary. All rankings must be in by Sunday at midnight EST and I will being accepting them Friday. I will post the results next Tuesday. Check the writeup thread for how the rankings will work (I will be posting the criteria soon).

RR9 · Post #414 » by **RR9** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:54 pm

i have a plethora of SFs:

shane battier
grant hill
james jones

i'm looking for a more natural sg. i also have anthony parker and delonte west if ppl are interested.

poopdamoop · Post #415 » by **poopdamoop** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:53 pm

Looking for a solid backup big. Mike Miller, Q-rich, and Beno Udrih are available, plus future picks.

dudeguyboy@hotmail.com

babyjax13 · Post #416 » by **babyjax13** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 10:02 pm

I just received this offer to keep the game running through Friday. If people want to do it, it makes no difference to me. My only concern is that with the current activity level it will be pointless to continue on, but if the interest is there, so be it.

I don't know fully what's involved, but If you do the UFA through Tuesday and Update trades, I would volunteer to approve trades posted to the thread through the Friday end of trading deadline. Once the FA ends there should be a little time to make last deals. Friday Midnight EST ends trading - I can approve by Sat AM and write up due and you determine results by Tues. Not sure if that helps enough, Just an offer.

-Kees- · Post #417 » by **-Kees-** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:04 pm

I'm fine ending where we are. I just need to sign some mins on NOH then I'm done with both my teams.

I do want to comment on the ranking. I don't think the "win now" and "win later" rankings are a good idea, because it gives a huge advantage to teams with better situations at the beginning. I think how we have been doing it (rank all teams total how they did, with what they started with, then 2013 winner, 2018 winner)

Warriorfan · Post #418 » by **Warriorfan** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:21 pm

Id be for a season that ends fri midnight est writeups over the weekend final ranking tues

Warriorfan · Post #419 » by **Warriorfan** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:22 pm

Id be for a season that ends fri midnight est writeups over the weekend final ranking tues

babyjax13 · Post #420 » by **babyjax13** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:35 pm

Keeslinator wrote:I'm fine ending where we are. I just need to sign some mins on NOH then I'm done with both my teams.

I do want to comment on the ranking. I don't think the "win now" and "win later" rankings are a good idea, because it gives a huge advantage to teams with better situations at the beginning. I think how we have been doing it (rank all teams total how they did, with what they started with, then 2013 winner, 2018 winner)

So just rank all teams 1-xx? I am fine with that if people feel it works better. We've still got a couple days to iron out the ranking system, so some discussion would be good.

Should we use a new CBA?