"Virtually no correlation between payroll and win%" - wrong

Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake

Bubstubbler
Starter
Posts: 2,326
And1: 755
Joined: Jun 13, 2009

"Virtually no correlation between payroll and win%" - wrong 

Post#1 » by Bubstubbler » Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:21 pm

As the NBA league office continues the lockout in an apparent bid to create more parity among teams, a professor of economics at Smith College who has studied the issue says there is almost no relationship between the size of a team's payroll and its success.

The statistical correlation between payroll and win percentage is practically nonexistent,” said Andrew Zimbalist.

Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/21 ... z1aakZdNpk


That's laughably false. Here's a ranking of payrolls from last season with playoff teams in red. Notice a correlation? 12 out of the 15 teams in the top half in payroll rankings made the playoffs; only 4 out of the 15 teams in the bottom half did. Furthermore, none of the 4 teams from the bottom half were serious contenders (seeded 7/8/8/5 respectively), whereas arguably the top 6 contenders were all in the top 9 in payroll.

Team Payrolls

1. Los Angeles Lakers $91,311,749
2. Orlando Magic $74,816,623
3. San Antonio Spurs $73,181,595
4. Boston Celtics $72,473,961
5. Portland Trail Blazers $66,343,649
6. Atlanta Hawks $65,846,237
7. Miami Heat $65,313,758
8. Dallas Mavericks $63,184,541
9. Chicago Bulls $61,674,069
10. New York Knicks $60,612,189

11. Utah Jazz $55,614,192
12. Cleveland Cavaliers $55,457,657
13. Philadelphia 76ers $54,858,763
14. Oklahoma City Thunder $53,605,750

15. Milwaukee Bucks $51,849,140
16. Phoenix Suns $49,182,654
17. Golden State Warriors $49,105,952
18. Minnesota Timberwolves $48,355,542
19. Detroit Pistons $48,263,032
20. Charlotte Bobcats $47,481,490
21. Houston Rockets $47,306,218
22. Toronto Raptors $46,879,433
23. Los Angeles Clippers $44,919,031
24. New Orleans Hornets $42,066,057
25. Washington Wizards $40,682,282
26. New Jersey Nets $39,814,161
27. Memphis Grizzlies $37,363,810
28. Indiana Pacers $36,957,444

29. Sacramento Kings $29,903,965
30. Denver Nuggets $28,883,142

Read more: http://hoopshype.com/salaries.htm#ixzz1aal7h9fh
aurareturn1
Banned User
Posts: 887
And1: 4
Joined: Sep 19, 2011
Contact:

Re: "Virtually no correlation between payroll and win%" - wr 

Post#2 » by aurareturn1 » Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:29 pm

Those payroll numbers are wrong though. There is a minimum salary in the NBA and it's definitely higher than $28 million.
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,118
And1: 9,817
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

Re: "Virtually no correlation between payroll and win%" - wr 

Post#3 » by Blame Rasho » Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:30 pm

You realize it is over years... and not just one year....

The Spurs were always among the lowest payroll teams in the 2000s and were an elite team, so before you think you are smarter than a guy with a PHD that surely put more time into his thoughts instead of going to hoophype and comparing it to just this past years playoff team and going ahh ha....And you also fail to realize some teams are also missing half their player salaries with unknown salaries and free agents.
User avatar
john2jer
RealGM
Posts: 15,304
And1: 452
Joined: May 26, 2006
Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
 

Re: "Virtually no correlation between payroll and win%" - wr 

Post#4 » by john2jer » Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:32 pm

aurareturn1 wrote:Those payroll numbers are wrong though. There is a minimum salary in the NBA and it's definitely higher than $28 million.


Looks like the 2011-12 salary figures. Half of Denver's team up and vanished to China.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
User avatar
Sasaki
Veteran
Posts: 2,824
And1: 786
Joined: May 30, 2010
 

Re: "Virtually no correlation between payroll and win%" - wr 

Post#5 » by Sasaki » Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:32 pm

aurareturn1 wrote:Those payroll numbers are wrong though. There is a minimum salary in the NBA and it's definitely higher than $28 million.

Yeah. Off the top of head, I know the Rockets had one of the higher payrolls in the 10-11 season, and didn't make the playoffs ( Hi Yao).
But do you know what they call a fool, who's full of himself and jumps into the path of death because it's cool?
ace88
Freshman
Posts: 83
And1: 7
Joined: Jul 09, 2008

Re: "Virtually no correlation between payroll and win%" - wr 

Post#6 » by ace88 » Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:34 pm

Having money doesn't guarantee winning, but not having money usually guarantees not winning.
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,118
And1: 9,817
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

Re: "Virtually no correlation between payroll and win%" - wr 

Post#7 » by Blame Rasho » Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:35 pm

john2jer wrote:
aurareturn1 wrote:Those payroll numbers are wrong though. There is a minimum salary in the NBA and it's definitely higher than $28 million.


Looks like the 2011-12 salary figures. Half of Denver's team up and vanished to China.


Look at New Orleans...6 players.
EtchenBa
Starter
Posts: 2,156
And1: 573
Joined: Jun 28, 2008
 

Re: "Virtually no correlation between payroll and win%" - wr 

Post#8 » by EtchenBa » Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:37 pm

I haven't read the study, but I'm assuming there are many other variables that he controlled for. It's very possible that win% could increase as payroll does, but it doesn't mean one causes the other. They might both increase as a result of some other variable.

He's a professor of economics...he has a Ph.D. He didn't just line up teams in order of payroll and see if win% was similarly ordered.
Agenda42
General Manager
Posts: 9,847
And1: 461
Joined: Jun 29, 2008

Re: "Virtually no correlation between payroll and win%" - wr 

Post#9 » by Agenda42 » Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:40 pm

Since the luxury tax was enacted, every champion has been a tax payer.
EtchenBa
Starter
Posts: 2,156
And1: 573
Joined: Jun 28, 2008
 

Re: "Virtually no correlation between payroll and win%" - wr 

Post#10 » by EtchenBa » Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:44 pm

Blame Rasho wrote:You realize it is over years... and not just one year....

The Spurs were always among the lowest payroll teams in the 2000s and were an elite team, so before you think you are smarter than a guy with a PHD that surely put more time into his thoughts instead of going to hoophype and comparing it to just this past years playoff team and going ahh ha....And you also fail to realize some teams are also missing half their player salaries with unknown salaries and free agents.


Almost certainly: http://sophia.smith.edu/~azimbali/biography1.html
Apathy
Banned User
Posts: 2,583
And1: 39
Joined: Aug 25, 2011

Re: "Virtually no correlation between payroll and win%" - wr 

Post#11 » by Apathy » Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:47 pm

You might want to read this article:

http://wagesofwins.net/2011/08/10/nba-o ... e-balance/

One can also look at payroll and wins across this same time period. We do find a statistically significant link between team spending and wins. But team payroll only explains 6% of the variation in team wins. In other words, teams are not able to effectively buy wins in the NBA.


NBA fans don’t seem to care much about competitive balance. To illustrate, the NBA was much more balanced in the late 1970s, but it was not very popular. As noted, since Stern took over the NBA has not been balanced at all. And yet per game attendance has risen from about 11,000 in 1983-84 to more than 17,000 this past season. Furthermore, the league’s television contract has risen from less than $40 million per year (for the entire league) in 1984 to more than $900 million per year today.
StepBack3
Banned User
Posts: 696
And1: 2
Joined: Sep 17, 2011

Re: "Virtually no correlation between payroll and win%" - wr 

Post#12 » by StepBack3 » Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:51 pm

Bubstubbler wrote:
As the NBA league office continues the lockout in an apparent bid to create more parity among teams, a professor of economics at Smith College who has studied the issue says there is almost no relationship between the size of a team's payroll and its success.

The statistical correlation between payroll and win percentage is practically nonexistent,” said Andrew Zimbalist.

Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/21 ... z1aakZdNpk


That's laughably false. Here's a ranking of payrolls from last season with playoff teams in red. Notice a correlation? 12 out of the 15 teams in the top half in payroll rankings made the playoffs; only 4 out of the 15 teams in the bottom half did. Furthermore, none of the 4 teams from the bottom half were serious contenders (seeded 7/8/8/5 respectively), whereas arguably the top 6 contenders were all in the top 9 in payroll.

Team Payrolls

1. Los Angeles Lakers $91,311,749
2. Orlando Magic $74,816,623
3. San Antonio Spurs $73,181,595
4. Boston Celtics $72,473,961
5. Portland Trail Blazers $66,343,649
6. Atlanta Hawks $65,846,237
7. Miami Heat $65,313,758
8. Dallas Mavericks $63,184,541
9. Chicago Bulls $61,674,069
10. New York Knicks $60,612,189

11. Utah Jazz $55,614,192
12. Cleveland Cavaliers $55,457,657
13. Philadelphia 76ers $54,858,763
14. Oklahoma City Thunder $53,605,750

15. Milwaukee Bucks $51,849,140
16. Phoenix Suns $49,182,654
17. Golden State Warriors $49,105,952
18. Minnesota Timberwolves $48,355,542
19. Detroit Pistons $48,263,032
20. Charlotte Bobcats $47,481,490
21. Houston Rockets $47,306,218
22. Toronto Raptors $46,879,433
23. Los Angeles Clippers $44,919,031
24. New Orleans Hornets $42,066,057
25. Washington Wizards $40,682,282
26. New Jersey Nets $39,814,161
27. Memphis Grizzlies $37,363,810
28. Indiana Pacers $36,957,444

29. Sacramento Kings $29,903,965
30. Denver Nuggets $28,883,142

Read more: http://hoopshype.com/salaries.htm#ixzz1aal7h9fh



Image
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,750
And1: 4,100
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: "Virtually no correlation between payroll and win%" - wr 

Post#13 » by EvanZ » Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:13 pm

Almost a 30% explanation of PyWins by salary is "practically nonexistent" according to this fella. :lol:

Image

Code: Select all

> summary(salary.lm)

Call:
lm(formula = PYWINS ~ Salary, data = salary_wins)

Residuals:
    Min      1Q  Median      3Q     Max
-24.186  -7.223  -1.698   6.755  25.239

Coefficients:
            Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)   
(Intercept)  14.1752     7.9204   1.790  0.08432 .
Salary        0.5047     0.1433   3.523  0.00149 **
---
Signif. codes:  0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

Residual standard error: 10.8 on 28 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 0.3071,   Adjusted R-squared: 0.2824
F-statistic: 12.41 on 1 and 28 DF,  p-value: 0.001485
patagonia
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,804
And1: 2,032
Joined: Feb 17, 2010

Re: "Virtually no correlation between payroll and win%" - wr 

Post#14 » by patagonia » Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:45 pm

I've always felt that getting lucky in the draft was a better indicator of success. If we were to go back and look at the championship teams for the last 30 years, in how many of them would the best player on that team not have been drafted by that team? (Let's count Kobe since he was a draft-day acquisition). Maybe 5 times? And 3 of those are Shaq.
User avatar
Firesphere
Junior
Posts: 367
And1: 7
Joined: Jul 21, 2006

Re: "Virtually no correlation between payroll and win%" - wr 

Post#15 » by Firesphere » Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:49 pm

Regardless of the correlation between payroll and win %, I really think the most under rated factor in the entire league is the coach.... it is clear that there is a massive gap between great coaches and awful coaches in this league.... a great coach makes or breaks the team... I would really like to see a study on coaching and see what an impact specific coaches have had on winning teams. I think that this study about no correlation between payroll and win % is obviously thought out and studied by someone with far more time on their hands than I have... However... I think a fine balance probably supports the fact that a team "willing" to go higher when it counts has a higher win%.
Vides990
Starter
Posts: 2,082
And1: 972
Joined: Mar 30, 2011
   

Re: "Virtually no correlation between payroll and win%" - wr 

Post#16 » by Vides990 » Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:51 pm

LOL at telling the professional statistician that theyre wrong. NBA player sided fans have been saying this for months. Small market fans constantly turning a blind eye to facts. :lol:
Preemptively joining the Bucks and Twolves bandwagons.
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,750
And1: 4,100
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: "Virtually no correlation between payroll and win%" - wr 

Post#17 » by EvanZ » Wed Oct 12, 2011 8:26 pm

Vides990 wrote:LOL at telling the professional statistician that theyre wrong. NBA player sided fans have been saying this for months. Small market fans constantly turning a blind eye to facts. :lol:


He's not a professional statistician. He's an economics professor. I'm an engineering professor. Does he have more right to use statistics than I do?
Lakers05
Banned User
Posts: 6,098
And1: 4
Joined: Oct 31, 2005

Re: "Virtually no correlation between payroll and win%" - wr 

Post#18 » by Lakers05 » Wed Oct 12, 2011 8:48 pm

Where can we find the team salaries for the past 7 years?
nugzin2040
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,691
And1: 8
Joined: Apr 05, 2011

Re: "Virtually no correlation between payroll and win%" - wr 

Post#19 » by nugzin2040 » Wed Oct 12, 2011 8:51 pm

Those payroll numbers are wrong though. There is a minimum salary in the NBA and it's definitely higher than $28 million.


Yeah, the Nuggets payroll was double that after the Melo trade. Even more, before it.
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,750
And1: 4,100
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: "Virtually no correlation between payroll and win%" - wr 

Post#20 » by EvanZ » Wed Oct 12, 2011 9:00 pm

nugzin2040 wrote:
Those payroll numbers are wrong though. There is a minimum salary in the NBA and it's definitely higher than $28 million.


Yeah, the Nuggets payroll was double that after the Melo trade. Even more, before it.


Correcting this makes the correlation larger. You realize that, I hope.

Return to The General Board