Who should the Eagles select if they get the #1 overall pick

Moderator: bwgood77

Mr Swagtastic
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,930
And1: 3,404
Joined: Dec 29, 2005
Location: Jurassic Park
         

Re: Who should the Eagles select if they get the #1 overall 

Post#21 » by Mr Swagtastic » Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:44 pm

Bleeding Blue wrote:
basics wrote:
trwi7 wrote:Still the Chiefs.


the Chiefs are better than the Eagles


No way. They have a better record right now, but the Eagles will get it together and be better than the Chiefs for sure.


Yup, The Eagles are horrid right now beyond bad to be honest but there is no way there are worse at the end of the year then Denver, Jacksonville, Kansas City, St. Louis, Miami, Indy (without Manning this year) and Minny, Seattle and Arizona.

If the Eagles did get the #1 overall pick I would take Luck without thinking twice move Vick for some good linebackers and count myself lucky.
Lord Leoshes wrote:i personally would rather keep Chalmers over Lowry
User avatar
Wade2k6
RealGM
Posts: 15,104
And1: 77
Joined: May 29, 2004
 

Re: Who should the Eagles select if they get the #1 overall 

Post#22 » by Wade2k6 » Sun Oct 16, 2011 4:11 pm

What team in their right mind would trade any linebacker of significant value for Vick and his bloated contract? If for some reason the Eagles do get the #1 pick, it would make much more sense to drop down 3-6 spots and pick up a stud LB and high draft picks. Some team will sacrifice a **** for Luck.
basics
Ballboy
Posts: 24
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 21, 2011

Re: Who should the Eagles select if they get the #1 overall  

Post#23 » by basics » Sat Oct 22, 2011 3:59 am

If the Eagles can get Luck, i think they can trade Vick to a desperate team for a 3rd or 4th round pick
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,689
And1: 27,271
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Who should the Eagles select if they get the #1 overall 

Post#24 » by trwi7 » Sat Oct 22, 2011 4:27 pm

basics wrote:If the Eagles can get Luck, i think they can trade Vick to a desperate team for a 3rd or 4th round pick


They can't. They're not anywhere near the worst team in the NFL and are ahead of teams who are much worse than them.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
Bleeding Blue
Head Coach
Posts: 6,573
And1: 538
Joined: Feb 29, 2008
Location: Home Of The Worlds Largest Christmas Tree
   

Re: Who should the Eagles select if they get the #1 overall  

Post#25 » by Bleeding Blue » Sat Oct 22, 2011 4:58 pm

Why are people even saying the Eagles could get the #1 pick? Its not going to happen, this conversation is pointless.
"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my ass!"

- Bobby Knight
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,689
And1: 27,271
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Who should the Eagles select if they get the #1 overall 

Post#26 » by trwi7 » Sat Oct 22, 2011 10:20 pm

Bleeding Blue wrote:Why are people even saying the Eagles could get the #1 pick? Its not going to happen, this conversation is pointless.


There's only one person saying it.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
number15
Banned User
Posts: 1,675
And1: 43
Joined: Jun 08, 2010

Re: Who should the Eagles select if they get the #1 overall  

Post#27 » by number15 » Fri Oct 28, 2011 6:29 pm

Toronto would be crazy not to take Andrew Luck..... he would be the future of a team that is obviously gonna lose for a few season. C'mon, for new franchises in a league.

Return to The General NFL Board