Should visors be mandatory?

User avatar
Nolan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,911
And1: 6,612
Joined: Aug 26, 2007
Location: Edmonton AB
   

Should visors be mandatory? 

Post#1 » by Nolan » Mon Oct 31, 2011 12:01 am

http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=379208

Flyers defenceman Chris Pronger has blurred vision in his right eye and does not know when he'll return to the ice after being jabbed in the face.

Pronger spoke Saturday night for the first time since Toronto's Mikhail Grabovski hit him just outside his right eye with a stick blade. Pronger says he feels lucky the injury was not worse because serious eye injuries have ended careers in the NHL.

Pronger, an 18-year veteran, does not wear a visor. The protective piece is not required in the NHL, though the Flyers said Pronger would not be cleared to play unless he wears one. Pronger declined to say if he would wear one whenever he comes back.


This is a huge blow for the Flyers but this could of been a lot worse. So my question is do you guys think visors should become mandatory in the league? That stick could of ended Prongers career.

I personally think they should be mandatory. Thoughts?
@bruce_arthur "And finally, as a whore." RT @docfunk "Here is what LeBron looks like as a Knick, a Fireman, an Astronaut..."
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

Re: Should visors be mandatory? 

Post#2 » by WEFFPIM » Mon Oct 31, 2011 1:19 am

Yep. Hell, I'd even go to face cages.
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
ajaX82
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,160
And1: 85
Joined: Jul 04, 2006

Re: Should visors be mandatory? 

Post#3 » by ajaX82 » Mon Oct 31, 2011 1:51 am

Yes. Most of the league is using them anyways and it's not like they impede the players in any way (except maybe during a fight)

There is no reason not to require it
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,122
And1: 27,721
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Should visors be mandatory? 

Post#4 » by trwi7 » Mon Oct 31, 2011 4:44 am

WEFFPIM wrote:Yep. Hell, I'd even go to face cages.


This. It's stupid that they don't require face cages with defensemen getting down to block shots and forwards always in danger of taking a deflected puck (or worse a shot that makes it through traffic without slowing it down) in the face.

No reason for a player to miss any games because they got hit with a puck.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Crowned
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 4,491
And1: 155
Joined: Jun 22, 2003
Location: Toronto

Re: Should visors be mandatory? 

Post#5 » by Crowned » Wed Nov 2, 2011 7:03 pm

Absolutely. Ever since the Berard incident (there were others obviously before, but this should've woken them up) the NHL should've implemented a rule.

Return to The General NHL Board