ImageImageImageImageImage

Wizards in the Media Thread

Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33

User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,091
And1: 22,498
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Wizards in the Media Thread 

Post#881 » by nate33 » Wed Nov 2, 2011 4:19 pm

FWIW, I agree wholeheartedly with fishercob. I don't think there's any serious concern with offering Nick Young a front-loaded contract rather than a flat-rate contract. These people aren't total morons. They can do basic math. By any rational analysis, the Wizards are doing Young a favor by paying him more money up front.

Like fishercob, said, just be up front and honest with him. Tell him that we think he's worth $5M a year but we want to pay him most of the money up front so we can have cap room to go after a superstar free agent in 2012. I'm sure Young would be pleased to hear that's the plan. Who wouldn't want to sign with an owner who has a long-term strategy to build a championship contender? Heck, I'd frontload it even more. Instead of $10M in Year 1 and $3.3M a year thereafter, I'd pay him $14M in Year 1 and $2M a year thereafter.

And CCJ makes a good point too. It might make sense to try and pay Young through some kind of deferred trust vehicle (whether it's CD's or through some third party money handler, it doesn't matter). My guess is that Young would decline, but at least make the offer to structure it that way. If Young whines about his salary in 2015, Leonsis could remind him that the deferred option was on the table.
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: Wizards in the Media Thread 

Post#882 » by fishercob » Wed Nov 2, 2011 6:42 pm

Nivek wrote:
Zonkerbl wrote:Didn't PRECISELY THIS SORT OF THING just happen with Blatche's contract? Why did we renegotiate it?


Wiz EXTENDED Blatche. They didn't renegotiate it, they added to it.


Indeed, and the nature of his extension was one of the reasons many of us hated the Yi trade -- the opportunity cost of the cap room (which brings this all full circle when discussing Lee's Rashard Lewis take). Without the extra cap room that Yi cost we could have front-loaded more of Blatche's deal more, thereby lessening the long term hit, making him easier to trade if we wanted, etc..
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,141
And1: 7,902
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Wizards in the Media Thread 

Post#883 » by Dat2U » Wed Nov 2, 2011 11:30 pm

I'll take a dissenting view point. I'll agree with Michael Lee about keeping Rashard but for totally different reasons. Screw his shooting ability, locker room presence or leadership potential. Bottom line is we aren't ready to compete and therefore don't need a load of cap room. And we don't need another Hinrich type deal for bunch more of middlin' picks. Don't we have enough mid-late 1st round prospects as is? How many more do we need? Now a lottery pick is a different story but I don't see too many lottery teams offering up 2012 picks considering the nature of that draft.

So essentially why waste a get out of jail card for minimal benefits? You all know Ernie's history so a bad free agency deal is right around the corner. So lets save that card until we REALLY need it, not just so we can overpay Nick Young.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,141
And1: 7,902
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Wizards in the Media Thread 

Post#884 » by Dat2U » Wed Nov 2, 2011 11:33 pm

Just to follow up on Ernie's history, don't forget, despite Leonsis' claims of not being a player in free agency last season, Ernie kicked the tires on potentially signing Josh Childress before losing out to Phoenix. Imagine if that happened, we'd all be talking about amnesting Childress instead of Lewis.
mhd
General Manager
Posts: 9,624
And1: 1,672
Joined: Mar 25, 2004

Re: Wizards in the Media Thread 

Post#885 » by mhd » Thu Nov 3, 2011 12:11 am

Dat, haven't you been the biggest save cap space for Dwight proponent of all?
User avatar
willbcocks
Analyst
Posts: 3,629
And1: 278
Joined: Mar 17, 2003
Location: Wall-E has come to save Washington!

Re: Wizards in the Media Thread 

Post#886 » by willbcocks » Thu Nov 3, 2011 1:51 am

I can't blame someone for almost doing something based on media reports when the fact of the matter is he didn't end up doing it. Since Ted's arrival, Ernie has not made any bad free agent signings. Instead, he's turned cap space into Singleton, Crawford, and Seraphin. Obviously this isn't propelling us to a dynasty, and our biggest need now is elite talent, but we still have a need for talent across the board.

Picks in the 15-25 range can fill out the team cheaply, and if we do it enough, we might even get lucky and get an all-star level player. Or if we think we have enough to develop already, we could trade our cap space for future picks, which I think are an undervalued resource.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,141
And1: 7,902
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Wizards in the Media Thread 

Post#887 » by Dat2U » Thu Nov 3, 2011 3:29 am

mhd wrote:Dat, haven't you been the biggest save cap space for Dwight proponent of all?


As much as I would love Howard in DC, I don't see it as being realistic, especially after ending up with Vesely in the lottery. Other teams can offer more talent, in more desirable locations with better veteran players. All we have is John Wall, who's two years removed from high school, a ton a cap room and boatload of immaturity (Blatche, McGee & maybe Young). We simply don't measure up.

Our future IMO is the 2012 draft. That's going to be the best opportunity to find a star to compliment Wall
7-Day Dray
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,422
And1: 5
Joined: May 22, 2011
Location: DMV

Re: Wizards in the Media Thread 

Post#888 » by 7-Day Dray » Thu Nov 3, 2011 3:38 am

Dat2U wrote:
mhd wrote:Dat, haven't you been the biggest save cap space for Dwight proponent of all?


As much as I would love Howard in DC, I don't see it as being realistic, especially after ending up with Vesely in the lottery. Other teams can offer more talent, in more desirable locations with better veteran players. All we have is John Wall, who's two years removed from high school, a ton a cap room and boatload of immaturity (Blatche, McGee & maybe Young). We simply don't measure up.

Our future IMO is the 2012 draft. That's going to be the best opportunity to find a star to compliment Wall


I think you're underrating our talent.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,141
And1: 7,902
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Wizards in the Media Thread 

Post#889 » by Dat2U » Thu Nov 3, 2011 3:53 am

willbcocks wrote:I can't blame someone for almost doing something based on media reports when the fact of the matter is he didn't end up doing it. Since Ted's arrival, Ernie has not made any bad free agent signings. Instead, he's turned cap space into Singleton, Crawford, and Seraphin. Obviously this isn't propelling us to a dynasty, and our biggest need now is elite talent, but we still have a need for talent across the board.

Picks in the 15-25 range can fill out the team cheaply, and if we do it enough, we might even get lucky and get an all-star level player. Or if we think we have enough to develop already, we could trade our cap space for future picks, which I think are an undervalued resource.


True, you cannot blame someone for something that didn't happen, but I gotta take issue with the comment that Ernie hasn't made any bad free agent signings.

Antonio Daniels - 6 yr deal (about 2 years too long)
Darius Songaila - 4 yr deal. Couldn't rebound to save his life. Gave us basically nothing.
DeShawn Stevenson - Gave us two of worst playoff performances in recent memory.

He also re-signed many of his own free agents.

Gilbert Arenas - Nothing needs to be said
Antawn Jamison - "aka lets 'go all in' on mediocrity", aka "The Leader of Men"
Andray Blatche - if we could only go back in time, lol

As for filling out the roster with picks in the 15-25 range, what exactly does that accomplish? How's that a solid strategy for building a contending team? We need stars not a bunch of future role players or future Spain ACB League all-stars. We've already loaded up on low first rounders. I really think that strategy has run it's course. It's the top 5 draft picks that make the difference, with these late 1st rounders your basically just shopping for shiny pennies.

Adding future picks is a fine strategy, but again, with $30+ mil in cap room your talking about overkill. It shouldn't cost $10 million in cap space to buy a pick. I'm afraid jettisoning Lewis and leaving Ernie with all that cap room in a weak free agency pool could lead to some very bad choices. I'd rather keep the sorry roster as is, waive Nick bye bye, stink up the joint in an abbreviated season if there is one and enjoy the benefits of a large number of lottery balls in a game changing draft. Any cap room available from losing Nick could be used towards acquiring future picks but otherwise I'd avoid doing anything that might artificially inflate our win total.
User avatar
Nivek
Head Coach
Posts: 7,406
And1: 959
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Contact:
         

Re: Wizards in the Media Thread 

Post#890 » by Nivek » Thu Nov 3, 2011 1:21 pm

Dat2U wrote:
Antonio Daniels - 6 yr deal (about 2 years too long)


5 years actually. Still too long, of course. Then he dealt him in the deal that brought Mike "Delusional" James and Javaris Crittenton.

Darius Songaila - 4 yr deal. Couldn't rebound to save his life. Gave us basically nothing.


Yep. Songaila rode basically one good season to a lucrative career. Wiz signed him to be a pick-and-pop partner with Daniels.

DeShawn Stevenson - Gave us two of worst playoff performances in recent memory.


The initial deal -- the one for the league minimum -- was good. The follow-up deal wasn't good. I tried to defend it for awhile, but it was a deal for the wrong reasons. It was a "show everyone we'll reward good play" contract, not a "this guy is really good and will be a quality player for us" contract.

He also re-signed many of his own free agents.

Gilbert Arenas - Nothing needs to be said


I think this one is defensible. Arenas was a flake, but he was also a serious baller -- one of the elite offensive threats in the league. He had a knee injury from which thousands of athletes make full recoveries. There just was no reason to think Arenas would be constantly injured and then would shoot himself in the foot.

Antawn Jamison - "aka lets 'go all in' on mediocrity", aka "The Leader of Men"


Classic NBA deal -- one of the "this is what's wrong with how these guys do business" contracts. Jamison never should have been a max salary guy in the first place, but he got the phat deal because of per game scoring and rebounding. The re-sign the Wizards did was essentially based on his previous deal, and it was a bad move when considering the combination of Jamison's age and production.

Andray Blatche - if we could only go back in time, lol


Yep.

As for filling out the roster with picks in the 15-25 range, what exactly does that accomplish? How's that a solid strategy for building a contending team? We need stars not a bunch of future role players or future Spain ACB League all-stars. We've already loaded up on low first rounders. I really think that strategy has run it's course. It's the top 5 draft picks that make the difference, with these late 1st rounders your basically just shopping for shiny pennies.

Adding future picks is a fine strategy, but again, with $30+ mil in cap room your talking about overkill. It shouldn't cost $10 million in cap space to buy a pick. I'm afraid jettisoning Lewis and leaving Ernie with all that cap room in a weak free agency pool could lead to some very bad choices. I'd rather keep the sorry roster as is, waive Nick bye bye, stink up the joint in an abbreviated season if there is one and enjoy the benefits of a large number of lottery balls in a game changing draft. Any cap room available from losing Nick could be used towards acquiring future picks but otherwise I'd avoid doing anything that might artificially inflate our win total.


I agree -- the Wiz don't need more role players and bench guys. They need some elite talent. Everyone on the roster except Wall is expendable and replaceable. No one is worth worrying about if they depart. Keep 'em if it's a low price -- otherwise find someone else.

Wall looks like he's a building block. "Could-Be's" include McGee and Blatche. I don't think Blatche will be, but I'd be willing to give him another 20 games before dumping him. McGee probably won't be either, but I'd give him another season.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: Wizards in the Media Thread 

Post#891 » by fishercob » Thu Nov 3, 2011 1:43 pm

To be clear, will's comment was that Ernie hadn't made any stupid signings since Ted arrived -- and it's hard to argue with that.

Kev, to your point of everyone beyond Wall being expendable -- what is the upside of keeping Rashard on his current contract? It doesn't facilitate a trade (the cap room is just as or more valuable). There's considerable downside in the form of opportunity cost of that cap room.

I actually think a healthy Lewis (as he's reported to be) is our best small forward fair margin. But we're not going anywhere with him and there are potential games by getting him off the books.
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
User avatar
Nivek
Head Coach
Posts: 7,406
And1: 959
Joined: Sep 29, 2010
Contact:
         

Re: Wizards in the Media Thread 

Post#892 » by Nivek » Thu Nov 3, 2011 2:14 pm

I don't see any upside in keeping Lewis on his current contract. I'd use the amnesty thing on his deal and move on.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,141
And1: 7,902
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Wizards in the Media Thread 

Post#893 » by Dat2U » Thu Nov 3, 2011 3:26 pm

Nivek wrote:
Dat2U wrote:
Antonio Daniels - 6 yr deal (about 2 years too long)


5 years actually. Still too long, of course. Then he dealt him in the deal that brought Mike "Delusional" James and Javaris Crittenton.


Sorry, it seemed like 6 years, lol. Wow, how bad was that James/Crittenton trade? We also gave up Memphis' pick which I think would have been in the 2011 draft.

Nivek wrote:
Dat2U wrote:DeShawn Stevenson - Gave us two of worst playoff performances in recent memory.


The initial deal -- the one for the league minimum -- was good. The follow-up deal wasn't good. I tried to defend it for awhile, but it was a deal for the wrong reasons. It was a "show everyone we'll reward good play" contract, not a "this guy is really good and will be a quality player for us" contract.


Ernie seems old school in that sense. I've seen him do it on a couple of occasions.

Nivek wrote:
Dat2U wrote:He also re-signed many of his own free agents.

Gilbert Arenas - Nothing needs to be said


I think this one is defensible. Arenas was a flake, but he was also a serious baller -- one of the elite offensive threats in the league. He had a knee injury from which thousands of athletes make full recoveries. There just was no reason to think Arenas would be constantly injured and then would shoot himself in the foot.


I hear you. At the time I supported the re-signing but I supported it because I thought he was recovering and close to healthy, when in fact his left knee is was bad shape. When Arenas admitted that the Wizards KNEW the severity of his condition WHEN they re-signed him that changed everything for me. I don't know how anyone could take $100 million risk with the knowledge of a guy having serious complications from a knee injury. That was just staggering to me.

Nivek wrote:
Dat2U wrote:Antawn Jamison - "aka lets 'go all in' on mediocrity", aka "The Leader of Men"


Classic NBA deal -- one of the "this is what's wrong with how these guys do business" contracts. Jamison never should have been a max salary guy in the first place, but he got the phat deal because of per game scoring and rebounding. The re-sign the Wizards did was essentially based on his previous deal, and it was a bad move when considering the combination of Jamison's age and production.


Crazy thing is Jamison was long considered overpaid on his old deal so to reward him again with a similar type salary was very questionable. But I think the Wizards offer may have been influenced by Philadelphia's interest in Antawn at that time. Plus we all know about Gil's ultimatum at the time.

Nivek wrote:
Dat2U wrote:As for filling out the roster with picks in the 15-25 range, what exactly does that accomplish? How's that a solid strategy for building a contending team? We need stars not a bunch of future role players or future Spain ACB League all-stars. We've already loaded up on low first rounders. I really think that strategy has run it's course. It's the top 5 draft picks that make the difference, with these late 1st rounders your basically just shopping for shiny pennies.

Adding future picks is a fine strategy, but again, with $30+ mil in cap room your talking about overkill. It shouldn't cost $10 million in cap space to buy a pick. I'm afraid jettisoning Lewis and leaving Ernie with all that cap room in a weak free agency pool could lead to some very bad choices. I'd rather keep the sorry roster as is, waive Nick bye bye, stink up the joint in an abbreviated season if there is one and enjoy the benefits of a large number of lottery balls in a game changing draft. Any cap room available from losing Nick could be used towards acquiring future picks but otherwise I'd avoid doing anything that might artificially inflate our win total.


I agree -- the Wiz don't need more role players and bench guys. They need some elite talent. Everyone on the roster except Wall is expendable and replaceable. No one is worth worrying about if they depart. Keep 'em if it's a low price -- otherwise find someone else.

Wall looks like he's a building block. "Could-Be's" include McGee and Blatche. I don't think Blatche will be, but I'd be willing to give him another 20 games before dumping him. McGee probably won't be either, but I'd give him another season.


Agreed on everyone outside of Wall being expendable. Also agree on the could-be's and probably wont's. Outside of Wall, there just isn't one guy you can hang your hat on. There's no reliability with our young core. It's all "might's", "maybe's" and "likely not's". Guys like Crawford, Booker, Seraphin, Vesely & Singleton are future role players, i.e. fill-in-the-gap rotation guys. That's not the foundation of a winning team, its the foundation of a good bench. We've got to get some first line talent.
User avatar
no D in Hibachi
Veteran
Posts: 2,654
And1: 7
Joined: Feb 08, 2007
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Wizards in the Media Thread 

Post#894 » by no D in Hibachi » Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:39 am

Perhaps this should go in the Laron Profit shrine thread, but seeing as how he's the new Sportstalk980 NBA/Wiz beat reporter I figure this thread is appropriate. I really think he's doing a great job as the new NBA sports talk beat. He's a zillion time better than the not-classy Jay Glassie. All I have to say is long live Laron, may he be forever immortalized by all Wizards fans.
mhd
General Manager
Posts: 9,624
And1: 1,672
Joined: Mar 25, 2004

Re: Wizards in the Media Thread 

Post#895 » by mhd » Wed Dec 14, 2011 2:01 am

no D in Hibachi wrote:Perhaps this should go in the Laron Profit shrine thread, but seeing as how he's the new Sportstalk980 NBA/Wiz beat reporter I figure this thread is appropriate. I really think he's doing a great job as the new NBA sports talk beat. He's a zillion time better than the not-classy Jay Glassie. All I have to say is long live Laron, may he be forever immortalized by all Wizards fans.



WOW, Laron is on 980? Have not listened in months. How is he? Still thought Scott Jackson was great (although his indifference of Haywood was furiating).
User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 14,966
And1: 6,736
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

Re: Wizards in the Media Thread 

Post#896 » by doclinkin » Wed Dec 14, 2011 3:12 am

mhd wrote:
no D in Hibachi wrote:Perhaps this should go in the Laron Profit shrine thread, but seeing as how he's the new Sportstalk980 NBA/Wiz beat reporter I figure this thread is appropriate. I really think he's doing a great job as the new NBA sports talk beat. He's a zillion time better than the not-classy Jay Glassie. All I have to say is long live Laron, may he be forever immortalized by all Wizards fans.



WOW, Laron is on 980? Have not listened in months. How is he? Still thought Scott Jackson was great (although his indifference of Haywood was furiating).


Surprisingly Laron is really really really good. I wish he had an hour long show all his own. Quick thinking, never unprepared for a question, has the inside dish, talks with current players on a variety of teams, and understands the business angle.

Had a housemate once who had to give him a c- in her english class, I guess I figured him for a mouthbreather, but nope.

Somebody bump the shrine. Laron can do it all.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,525
And1: 10,293
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Wizards in the Media Thread 

Post#897 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:22 am

Laron lets Chuck Norris THINK he's tough.
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,440
And1: 4,439
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Wizards in the Media Thread 

Post#898 » by closg00 » Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:20 pm

Wiz media day, Flip being interviewed on 980. On 106.7, it's an endless discussion on Ron Landry :rolleyes:
dobrojim
RealGM
Posts: 16,813
And1: 4,043
Joined: Sep 16, 2004

Re: Wizards in the Media Thread 

Post#899 » by dobrojim » Fri Dec 30, 2011 4:49 am

Halftime of the TNT game (DAL@OKC) you actually had Shaq and
the other guys giving some love to N1 and Javale. Unless they
werre being totally sarcastic and I missed it. I think that's the
first time they've said anything nice about the Wizards in
years. Shocking after 2 fugly losses that the natl media
would say good things about some of our players.
A lot of what we call 'thought' is just mental activity

When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression

Those who are convinced of absurdities, can be convinced to commit atrocities
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,798
And1: 7,924
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Wizards in the Media Thread 

Post#900 » by montestewart » Mon Jan 9, 2012 7:12 pm

Hope to see more like this
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wiz ... _blog.html
sanitize it in the sunlight.

Return to Washington Wizards